Cargando…

Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications

Despite the commercial rise of probiotics containing Bacillaceae spp., it remains important to assess the safety of each strain before clinical testing. Herein, we performed preclinical analyses to address the safety of Bacillus subtilis BS50. Using in silico analyses, we screened the 4.15 Mbp BS50...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brutscher, Laura M., Borgmeier, Claudia, Garvey, Sean M., Spears, Jessica L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051038
_version_ 1784715981996687360
author Brutscher, Laura M.
Borgmeier, Claudia
Garvey, Sean M.
Spears, Jessica L.
author_facet Brutscher, Laura M.
Borgmeier, Claudia
Garvey, Sean M.
Spears, Jessica L.
author_sort Brutscher, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description Despite the commercial rise of probiotics containing Bacillaceae spp., it remains important to assess the safety of each strain before clinical testing. Herein, we performed preclinical analyses to address the safety of Bacillus subtilis BS50. Using in silico analyses, we screened the 4.15 Mbp BS50 genome for genes encoding known Bacillus toxins, secondary metabolites, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance. We also assessed the effects of BS50 lysates on the viability and permeability of cultured human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2). We found that the BS50 genome does not encode any known Bacillus toxins. The BS50 genome contains several gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, but many of these antimicrobial metabolites (e.g., fengycin) are common to Bacillus spp. and may even confer health benefits related to gut microbiota health. BS50 was susceptible to seven of eight commonly prescribed antibiotics, and no antibiotic resistance genes were flanked by the complete mobile genetic elements that could enable a horizontal transfer. In cell culture, BS50 cell lysates did not diminish either Caco-2 viability or monolayer permeability. Altogether, BS50 exhibits a robust preclinical safety profile commensurate with commercial probiotic strains and likely poses no significant health risk to humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9144164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91441642022-05-29 Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications Brutscher, Laura M. Borgmeier, Claudia Garvey, Sean M. Spears, Jessica L. Microorganisms Article Despite the commercial rise of probiotics containing Bacillaceae spp., it remains important to assess the safety of each strain before clinical testing. Herein, we performed preclinical analyses to address the safety of Bacillus subtilis BS50. Using in silico analyses, we screened the 4.15 Mbp BS50 genome for genes encoding known Bacillus toxins, secondary metabolites, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance. We also assessed the effects of BS50 lysates on the viability and permeability of cultured human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2). We found that the BS50 genome does not encode any known Bacillus toxins. The BS50 genome contains several gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, but many of these antimicrobial metabolites (e.g., fengycin) are common to Bacillus spp. and may even confer health benefits related to gut microbiota health. BS50 was susceptible to seven of eight commonly prescribed antibiotics, and no antibiotic resistance genes were flanked by the complete mobile genetic elements that could enable a horizontal transfer. In cell culture, BS50 cell lysates did not diminish either Caco-2 viability or monolayer permeability. Altogether, BS50 exhibits a robust preclinical safety profile commensurate with commercial probiotic strains and likely poses no significant health risk to humans. MDPI 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9144164/ /pubmed/35630480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051038 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brutscher, Laura M.
Borgmeier, Claudia
Garvey, Sean M.
Spears, Jessica L.
Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications
title Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications
title_full Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications
title_fullStr Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications
title_full_unstemmed Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications
title_short Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications
title_sort preclinical safety assessment of bacillus subtilis bs50 for probiotic and food applications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051038
work_keys_str_mv AT brutscherlauram preclinicalsafetyassessmentofbacillussubtilisbs50forprobioticandfoodapplications
AT borgmeierclaudia preclinicalsafetyassessmentofbacillussubtilisbs50forprobioticandfoodapplications
AT garveyseanm preclinicalsafetyassessmentofbacillussubtilisbs50forprobioticandfoodapplications
AT spearsjessical preclinicalsafetyassessmentofbacillussubtilisbs50forprobioticandfoodapplications