Cargando…

Energy and Distance Based Multi-Objective Red Fox Optimization Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Network

In modern trends, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are interesting, and distributed in the environment to evaluate received data. The sensor nodes have a higher capacity to sense and transmit the information. A WSN contains low-cost, low-power, multi-function sensor nodes, with limited computational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natarajan, Rajathi, Megharaj, Geetha, Marchewka, Adam, Divakarachari, Parameshachari Bidare, Hans, Manoj Raghubir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22103761
Descripción
Sumario:In modern trends, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are interesting, and distributed in the environment to evaluate received data. The sensor nodes have a higher capacity to sense and transmit the information. A WSN contains low-cost, low-power, multi-function sensor nodes, with limited computational capabilities, used for observing environmental constraints. In previous research, many energy-efficient routing methods were suggested to improve the time of the network by minimizing energy consumption; sometimes, the sensor nodes run out of power quickly. The majority of recent articles present various methods aimed at reducing energy usage in sensor networks. In this paper, an energy-efficient clustering/routing technique, called the energy and distance based multi-objective red fox optimization algorithm (ED-MORFO), was proposed to reduce energy consumption. In each communication round of transmission, this technique selects the cluster head (CH) with the most residual energy, and finds the optimal routing to the base station. The simulation clearly shows that the proposed ED-MORFO achieves better performance in terms of energy consumption (0.46 J), packet delivery ratio (99.4%), packet loss rate (0.6%), end-to-end delay (11 s), routing overhead (0.11), throughput (0.99 Mbps), and network lifetime (3719 s), when compared with existing MCH-EOR and RDSAOA-EECP methods.