Cargando…

Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer

No clear criteria have yet been established to guide decision-making for patient selection and the optimal timing of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) based on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). We have developed a novel protocol—the Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy (B-ART) protocol—to guide patient selectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bak, Bartosz, Skrobala, Agnieszka, Adamska, Anna, Kazmierska, Joanna, Jozefacka, Natalia, Piotrowski, Tomasz, Malicki, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12050722
_version_ 1784716112957538304
author Bak, Bartosz
Skrobala, Agnieszka
Adamska, Anna
Kazmierska, Joanna
Jozefacka, Natalia
Piotrowski, Tomasz
Malicki, Julian
author_facet Bak, Bartosz
Skrobala, Agnieszka
Adamska, Anna
Kazmierska, Joanna
Jozefacka, Natalia
Piotrowski, Tomasz
Malicki, Julian
author_sort Bak, Bartosz
collection PubMed
description No clear criteria have yet been established to guide decision-making for patient selection and the optimal timing of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) based on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). We have developed a novel protocol—the Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy (B-ART) protocol—to guide patient selection for ART. The aim of the present study is to describe this protocol, to evaluate its validity in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer, and to identify the anatomical and clinical predictors of the need for replanning. We retrospectively evaluated 82 patients with HN cancer who underwent helical tomotherapy (HT) and subsequently required replanning due to soft tissue changes upon daily MVCT. Under the proposed criteria, patients with anatomical changes >3 mm on three to four consecutive scans are candidates for ART. We compared the volumes on the initial CT scan (iCT) and the replanning CT (rCT) scan for the clinical target volumes (CTV1, referring to primary tumor or tumor bed and CTV2, metastatic lymph nodes) and for the parotid glands (PG) and body contour (B-body). The patients were stratified by primary tumor localization, clinical stage, and treatment scheme. The main reasons for replanning were: (1) a planning target volume (PTV) outside the body contour (n = 70; 85.4%), (2) PG shrinkage (n = 69; 84.1%), (3) B-body deviations (n = 69; 84.1%), and (4) setup deviations (n = 40; 48.8%). The replanning decision was made, on average, during the fourth week of treatment (n = 47; 57.3%). The mean reductions in the size of the right and left PG volumes were 6.31 cc (20.9%) and 5.98 cc (20.5%), respectively (p < 0.001). The reduction in PG volume was ≥30% in 30 patients (36.6%). The volume reduction in all of the anatomical structures was statistically significant. Four variables—advanced stage disease (T3–T4), chemoradiation, increased weight loss, and oropharyngeal localization—were significantly associated with the need for ART. The B-ART protocol provides clear criteria to eliminate random errors, and to allow for an early response to relevant changes in target volumes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9144703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91447032022-05-29 Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer Bak, Bartosz Skrobala, Agnieszka Adamska, Anna Kazmierska, Joanna Jozefacka, Natalia Piotrowski, Tomasz Malicki, Julian Life (Basel) Article No clear criteria have yet been established to guide decision-making for patient selection and the optimal timing of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) based on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). We have developed a novel protocol—the Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy (B-ART) protocol—to guide patient selection for ART. The aim of the present study is to describe this protocol, to evaluate its validity in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer, and to identify the anatomical and clinical predictors of the need for replanning. We retrospectively evaluated 82 patients with HN cancer who underwent helical tomotherapy (HT) and subsequently required replanning due to soft tissue changes upon daily MVCT. Under the proposed criteria, patients with anatomical changes >3 mm on three to four consecutive scans are candidates for ART. We compared the volumes on the initial CT scan (iCT) and the replanning CT (rCT) scan for the clinical target volumes (CTV1, referring to primary tumor or tumor bed and CTV2, metastatic lymph nodes) and for the parotid glands (PG) and body contour (B-body). The patients were stratified by primary tumor localization, clinical stage, and treatment scheme. The main reasons for replanning were: (1) a planning target volume (PTV) outside the body contour (n = 70; 85.4%), (2) PG shrinkage (n = 69; 84.1%), (3) B-body deviations (n = 69; 84.1%), and (4) setup deviations (n = 40; 48.8%). The replanning decision was made, on average, during the fourth week of treatment (n = 47; 57.3%). The mean reductions in the size of the right and left PG volumes were 6.31 cc (20.9%) and 5.98 cc (20.5%), respectively (p < 0.001). The reduction in PG volume was ≥30% in 30 patients (36.6%). The volume reduction in all of the anatomical structures was statistically significant. Four variables—advanced stage disease (T3–T4), chemoradiation, increased weight loss, and oropharyngeal localization—were significantly associated with the need for ART. The B-ART protocol provides clear criteria to eliminate random errors, and to allow for an early response to relevant changes in target volumes. MDPI 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9144703/ /pubmed/35629389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12050722 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bak, Bartosz
Skrobala, Agnieszka
Adamska, Anna
Kazmierska, Joanna
Jozefacka, Natalia
Piotrowski, Tomasz
Malicki, Julian
Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer
title Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer
title_full Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer
title_fullStr Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer
title_short Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer
title_sort criteria for verification and replanning based on the adaptive radiotherapy protocol “best for adaptive radiotherapy” in head and neck cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12050722
work_keys_str_mv AT bakbartosz criteriaforverificationandreplanningbasedontheadaptiveradiotherapyprotocolbestforadaptiveradiotherapyinheadandneckcancer
AT skrobalaagnieszka criteriaforverificationandreplanningbasedontheadaptiveradiotherapyprotocolbestforadaptiveradiotherapyinheadandneckcancer
AT adamskaanna criteriaforverificationandreplanningbasedontheadaptiveradiotherapyprotocolbestforadaptiveradiotherapyinheadandneckcancer
AT kazmierskajoanna criteriaforverificationandreplanningbasedontheadaptiveradiotherapyprotocolbestforadaptiveradiotherapyinheadandneckcancer
AT jozefackanatalia criteriaforverificationandreplanningbasedontheadaptiveradiotherapyprotocolbestforadaptiveradiotherapyinheadandneckcancer
AT piotrowskitomasz criteriaforverificationandreplanningbasedontheadaptiveradiotherapyprotocolbestforadaptiveradiotherapyinheadandneckcancer
AT malickijulian criteriaforverificationandreplanningbasedontheadaptiveradiotherapyprotocolbestforadaptiveradiotherapyinheadandneckcancer