Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Early diagnosis of laryngeal lesions is necessary to begin treatment of patients as soon as possible to preserve optimal organ functions. Imaging examinations are often aided by artificial intelligence (AI) to improve quality and facilitate appropriate diagnosis. The aim of this study is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Żurek, Michał, Jasak, Kamil, Niemczyk, Kazimierz, Rzepakowska, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102752
_version_ 1784716114687688704
author Żurek, Michał
Jasak, Kamil
Niemczyk, Kazimierz
Rzepakowska, Anna
author_facet Żurek, Michał
Jasak, Kamil
Niemczyk, Kazimierz
Rzepakowska, Anna
author_sort Żurek, Michał
collection PubMed
description Background: Early diagnosis of laryngeal lesions is necessary to begin treatment of patients as soon as possible to preserve optimal organ functions. Imaging examinations are often aided by artificial intelligence (AI) to improve quality and facilitate appropriate diagnosis. The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic utility of AI in laryngeal endoscopy. Methods: Five databases were searched for studies implementing artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced models assessing images of laryngeal lesions taken during laryngeal endoscopy. Outcomes were analyzed in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: All 11 studies included presented an overall low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models was very high (from 0.806 to 0.997). The accuracy was significantly higher in studies using a larger database. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for identification of healthy laryngeal tissue were 0.91 and 0.97, respectively. The same values for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. The comparison of the effectiveness of AI models assessing narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy images revealed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.409 and 0.914). Conclusion: In assessing images of laryngeal lesions, AI demonstrates extraordinarily high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9144710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91447102022-05-29 Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Żurek, Michał Jasak, Kamil Niemczyk, Kazimierz Rzepakowska, Anna J Clin Med Systematic Review Background: Early diagnosis of laryngeal lesions is necessary to begin treatment of patients as soon as possible to preserve optimal organ functions. Imaging examinations are often aided by artificial intelligence (AI) to improve quality and facilitate appropriate diagnosis. The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic utility of AI in laryngeal endoscopy. Methods: Five databases were searched for studies implementing artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced models assessing images of laryngeal lesions taken during laryngeal endoscopy. Outcomes were analyzed in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: All 11 studies included presented an overall low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models was very high (from 0.806 to 0.997). The accuracy was significantly higher in studies using a larger database. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for identification of healthy laryngeal tissue were 0.91 and 0.97, respectively. The same values for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. The comparison of the effectiveness of AI models assessing narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy images revealed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.409 and 0.914). Conclusion: In assessing images of laryngeal lesions, AI demonstrates extraordinarily high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. MDPI 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9144710/ /pubmed/35628878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102752 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Żurek, Michał
Jasak, Kamil
Niemczyk, Kazimierz
Rzepakowska, Anna
Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort artificial intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102752
work_keys_str_mv AT zurekmichał artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jasakkamil artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niemczykkazimierz artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rzepakowskaanna artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis