Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Early diagnosis of laryngeal lesions is necessary to begin treatment of patients as soon as possible to preserve optimal organ functions. Imaging examinations are often aided by artificial intelligence (AI) to improve quality and facilitate appropriate diagnosis. The aim of this study is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102752 |
_version_ | 1784716114687688704 |
---|---|
author | Żurek, Michał Jasak, Kamil Niemczyk, Kazimierz Rzepakowska, Anna |
author_facet | Żurek, Michał Jasak, Kamil Niemczyk, Kazimierz Rzepakowska, Anna |
author_sort | Żurek, Michał |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Early diagnosis of laryngeal lesions is necessary to begin treatment of patients as soon as possible to preserve optimal organ functions. Imaging examinations are often aided by artificial intelligence (AI) to improve quality and facilitate appropriate diagnosis. The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic utility of AI in laryngeal endoscopy. Methods: Five databases were searched for studies implementing artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced models assessing images of laryngeal lesions taken during laryngeal endoscopy. Outcomes were analyzed in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: All 11 studies included presented an overall low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models was very high (from 0.806 to 0.997). The accuracy was significantly higher in studies using a larger database. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for identification of healthy laryngeal tissue were 0.91 and 0.97, respectively. The same values for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. The comparison of the effectiveness of AI models assessing narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy images revealed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.409 and 0.914). Conclusion: In assessing images of laryngeal lesions, AI demonstrates extraordinarily high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9144710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91447102022-05-29 Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Żurek, Michał Jasak, Kamil Niemczyk, Kazimierz Rzepakowska, Anna J Clin Med Systematic Review Background: Early diagnosis of laryngeal lesions is necessary to begin treatment of patients as soon as possible to preserve optimal organ functions. Imaging examinations are often aided by artificial intelligence (AI) to improve quality and facilitate appropriate diagnosis. The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic utility of AI in laryngeal endoscopy. Methods: Five databases were searched for studies implementing artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced models assessing images of laryngeal lesions taken during laryngeal endoscopy. Outcomes were analyzed in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: All 11 studies included presented an overall low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models was very high (from 0.806 to 0.997). The accuracy was significantly higher in studies using a larger database. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for identification of healthy laryngeal tissue were 0.91 and 0.97, respectively. The same values for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. The comparison of the effectiveness of AI models assessing narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy images revealed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.409 and 0.914). Conclusion: In assessing images of laryngeal lesions, AI demonstrates extraordinarily high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. MDPI 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9144710/ /pubmed/35628878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102752 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Żurek, Michał Jasak, Kamil Niemczyk, Kazimierz Rzepakowska, Anna Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | artificial intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zurekmichał artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jasakkamil artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT niemczykkazimierz artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rzepakowskaanna artificialintelligenceinlaryngealendoscopysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |