Cargando…

Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting

Background: Various synthetic and biological wound dressings are available for the treatment of superficial burns, and standard care differs among hospitals. Nevertheless, the search for an ideal wound dressing offering a safe healing environment as well as optimal scar quality while being economica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn, Andreae, Janine, Fuchs, Paul Christian, Lefering, Rolf, Heidekrueger, Paul Immanuel, Schulz, Alexandra, Bagheri, Mahsa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102857
_version_ 1784716176433086464
author Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Andreae, Janine
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Lefering, Rolf
Heidekrueger, Paul Immanuel
Schulz, Alexandra
Bagheri, Mahsa
author_facet Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Andreae, Janine
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Lefering, Rolf
Heidekrueger, Paul Immanuel
Schulz, Alexandra
Bagheri, Mahsa
author_sort Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
collection PubMed
description Background: Various synthetic and biological wound dressings are available for the treatment of superficial burns, and standard care differs among hospitals. Nevertheless, the search for an ideal wound dressing offering a safe healing environment as well as optimal scar quality while being economically attractive is a continuing process. In recent years, Dressilk(®), which consists of pure silk, has become the standard of care for the treatment of superficial burns in our hospital. However, no long-term scar-evaluation studies have been performed to compare Dressilk(®) with the often-used and more expensive Suprathel(®) in the treatment of superficial burns. Methods: Subjective and objective scar evaluations were performed three, six, and twelve months after treatment in patients who received simultaneous treatment of 20 superficial burn wounds with both Suprathel(®) and Dressilk(®). The evaluations were performed using the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Cutometer(®), Mexameter(®), Tewameter(®), and the O2C(®). Results: Both dressings showed mostly equivalent results in subjective scar evaluations. In the objective scar evaluations, the wounds treated with Dressilk(®) showed a faster return to the qualities of non-injured skin. Wound areas treated with the two dressings showed no significant differences in elasticity and transepidermal water loss after 12 months. Only oxygen saturation was significantly lower in wound areas treated with Suprathel(®) (p = 0.008). Subjectively, wound areas treated with Dressilk(®) showed significantly higher pigmentation after six months, which was not apparent after 12 months. Conclusion: Both wound dressings led to esthetically satisfying scar recovery without significant differences from normal uninjured skin after 12 months. Therefore, Dressilk(®) remains an economically and clinically interesting alternative to Suprathel(®) for the treatment of superficial burns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9144963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91449632022-05-29 Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn Andreae, Janine Fuchs, Paul Christian Lefering, Rolf Heidekrueger, Paul Immanuel Schulz, Alexandra Bagheri, Mahsa J Clin Med Article Background: Various synthetic and biological wound dressings are available for the treatment of superficial burns, and standard care differs among hospitals. Nevertheless, the search for an ideal wound dressing offering a safe healing environment as well as optimal scar quality while being economically attractive is a continuing process. In recent years, Dressilk(®), which consists of pure silk, has become the standard of care for the treatment of superficial burns in our hospital. However, no long-term scar-evaluation studies have been performed to compare Dressilk(®) with the often-used and more expensive Suprathel(®) in the treatment of superficial burns. Methods: Subjective and objective scar evaluations were performed three, six, and twelve months after treatment in patients who received simultaneous treatment of 20 superficial burn wounds with both Suprathel(®) and Dressilk(®). The evaluations were performed using the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Cutometer(®), Mexameter(®), Tewameter(®), and the O2C(®). Results: Both dressings showed mostly equivalent results in subjective scar evaluations. In the objective scar evaluations, the wounds treated with Dressilk(®) showed a faster return to the qualities of non-injured skin. Wound areas treated with the two dressings showed no significant differences in elasticity and transepidermal water loss after 12 months. Only oxygen saturation was significantly lower in wound areas treated with Suprathel(®) (p = 0.008). Subjectively, wound areas treated with Dressilk(®) showed significantly higher pigmentation after six months, which was not apparent after 12 months. Conclusion: Both wound dressings led to esthetically satisfying scar recovery without significant differences from normal uninjured skin after 12 months. Therefore, Dressilk(®) remains an economically and clinically interesting alternative to Suprathel(®) for the treatment of superficial burns. MDPI 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9144963/ /pubmed/35628983 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102857 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Andreae, Janine
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Lefering, Rolf
Heidekrueger, Paul Immanuel
Schulz, Alexandra
Bagheri, Mahsa
Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting
title Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting
title_full Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting
title_short Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk(®) and Suprathel(®)—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting
title_sort evaluation of scar quality after treatment of superficial burns with dressilk(®) and suprathel(®)—in an intraindividual clinical setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9144963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102857
work_keys_str_mv AT schieferjenniferlynn evaluationofscarqualityaftertreatmentofsuperficialburnswithdressilkandsuprathelinanintraindividualclinicalsetting
AT andreaejanine evaluationofscarqualityaftertreatmentofsuperficialburnswithdressilkandsuprathelinanintraindividualclinicalsetting
AT fuchspaulchristian evaluationofscarqualityaftertreatmentofsuperficialburnswithdressilkandsuprathelinanintraindividualclinicalsetting
AT leferingrolf evaluationofscarqualityaftertreatmentofsuperficialburnswithdressilkandsuprathelinanintraindividualclinicalsetting
AT heidekruegerpaulimmanuel evaluationofscarqualityaftertreatmentofsuperficialburnswithdressilkandsuprathelinanintraindividualclinicalsetting
AT schulzalexandra evaluationofscarqualityaftertreatmentofsuperficialburnswithdressilkandsuprathelinanintraindividualclinicalsetting
AT bagherimahsa evaluationofscarqualityaftertreatmentofsuperficialburnswithdressilkandsuprathelinanintraindividualclinicalsetting