Cargando…

Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors are currently the most widely used penile rehabilitation treatment for ED following RP, but they are less effective than for those with general ED. Low-intensity extracorporeal s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rho, Beom Yong, Kim, Si Hyeon, Ryu, Ji-Kan, Kang, Dong Hyuk, Kim, Jong Won, Chung, Doo Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102775
_version_ 1784716191940476928
author Rho, Beom Yong
Kim, Si Hyeon
Ryu, Ji-Kan
Kang, Dong Hyuk
Kim, Jong Won
Chung, Doo Yong
author_facet Rho, Beom Yong
Kim, Si Hyeon
Ryu, Ji-Kan
Kang, Dong Hyuk
Kim, Jong Won
Chung, Doo Yong
author_sort Rho, Beom Yong
collection PubMed
description Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors are currently the most widely used penile rehabilitation treatment for ED following RP, but they are less effective than for those with general ED. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment (LI-ESWT), causing a biological change that induces neovascularization, has recently been used as a treatment for ED. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficiency of LI-ESWT in ED following RP. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up until December 2021. The endpoint was the change in IIEF scores after LI-ESWT. Five papers (460 patients) were included in the final analysis. In IIEF scores performed 3–4 months after LI-ESWT, the group receiving LI-ESWT showed statistically significantly better results than the control (WMD = −2.04; 95% CI, −3.72 to −0.35; p = 0.02). However, there were a total of two studies that measured the results after 9–12 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (WMD = −5.37; 95% CI, −12.42 to 1.69; p = 0.14). The results of this analysis indicate that LI-ESWT showed a statistically significant effect on early recovery in penile rehabilitation of ED following RP. However, the level of evidence was low. Therefore, careful interpretation of the results is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9145026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91450262022-05-29 Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Rho, Beom Yong Kim, Si Hyeon Ryu, Ji-Kan Kang, Dong Hyuk Kim, Jong Won Chung, Doo Yong J Clin Med Review Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors are currently the most widely used penile rehabilitation treatment for ED following RP, but they are less effective than for those with general ED. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment (LI-ESWT), causing a biological change that induces neovascularization, has recently been used as a treatment for ED. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficiency of LI-ESWT in ED following RP. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up until December 2021. The endpoint was the change in IIEF scores after LI-ESWT. Five papers (460 patients) were included in the final analysis. In IIEF scores performed 3–4 months after LI-ESWT, the group receiving LI-ESWT showed statistically significantly better results than the control (WMD = −2.04; 95% CI, −3.72 to −0.35; p = 0.02). However, there were a total of two studies that measured the results after 9–12 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (WMD = −5.37; 95% CI, −12.42 to 1.69; p = 0.14). The results of this analysis indicate that LI-ESWT showed a statistically significant effect on early recovery in penile rehabilitation of ED following RP. However, the level of evidence was low. Therefore, careful interpretation of the results is required. MDPI 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9145026/ /pubmed/35628901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102775 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rho, Beom Yong
Kim, Si Hyeon
Ryu, Ji-Kan
Kang, Dong Hyuk
Kim, Jong Won
Chung, Doo Yong
Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment in erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102775
work_keys_str_mv AT rhobeomyong efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimsihyeon efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ryujikan efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kangdonghyuk efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimjongwon efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chungdooyong efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis