Cargando…
Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors are currently the most widely used penile rehabilitation treatment for ED following RP, but they are less effective than for those with general ED. Low-intensity extracorporeal s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102775 |
_version_ | 1784716191940476928 |
---|---|
author | Rho, Beom Yong Kim, Si Hyeon Ryu, Ji-Kan Kang, Dong Hyuk Kim, Jong Won Chung, Doo Yong |
author_facet | Rho, Beom Yong Kim, Si Hyeon Ryu, Ji-Kan Kang, Dong Hyuk Kim, Jong Won Chung, Doo Yong |
author_sort | Rho, Beom Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors are currently the most widely used penile rehabilitation treatment for ED following RP, but they are less effective than for those with general ED. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment (LI-ESWT), causing a biological change that induces neovascularization, has recently been used as a treatment for ED. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficiency of LI-ESWT in ED following RP. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up until December 2021. The endpoint was the change in IIEF scores after LI-ESWT. Five papers (460 patients) were included in the final analysis. In IIEF scores performed 3–4 months after LI-ESWT, the group receiving LI-ESWT showed statistically significantly better results than the control (WMD = −2.04; 95% CI, −3.72 to −0.35; p = 0.02). However, there were a total of two studies that measured the results after 9–12 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (WMD = −5.37; 95% CI, −12.42 to 1.69; p = 0.14). The results of this analysis indicate that LI-ESWT showed a statistically significant effect on early recovery in penile rehabilitation of ED following RP. However, the level of evidence was low. Therefore, careful interpretation of the results is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9145026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91450262022-05-29 Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Rho, Beom Yong Kim, Si Hyeon Ryu, Ji-Kan Kang, Dong Hyuk Kim, Jong Won Chung, Doo Yong J Clin Med Review Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors are currently the most widely used penile rehabilitation treatment for ED following RP, but they are less effective than for those with general ED. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment (LI-ESWT), causing a biological change that induces neovascularization, has recently been used as a treatment for ED. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficiency of LI-ESWT in ED following RP. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up until December 2021. The endpoint was the change in IIEF scores after LI-ESWT. Five papers (460 patients) were included in the final analysis. In IIEF scores performed 3–4 months after LI-ESWT, the group receiving LI-ESWT showed statistically significantly better results than the control (WMD = −2.04; 95% CI, −3.72 to −0.35; p = 0.02). However, there were a total of two studies that measured the results after 9–12 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (WMD = −5.37; 95% CI, −12.42 to 1.69; p = 0.14). The results of this analysis indicate that LI-ESWT showed a statistically significant effect on early recovery in penile rehabilitation of ED following RP. However, the level of evidence was low. Therefore, careful interpretation of the results is required. MDPI 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9145026/ /pubmed/35628901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102775 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Rho, Beom Yong Kim, Si Hyeon Ryu, Ji-Kan Kang, Dong Hyuk Kim, Jong Won Chung, Doo Yong Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment in erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102775 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhobeomyong efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimsihyeon efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ryujikan efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kangdonghyuk efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjongwon efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chungdooyong efficacyoflowintensityextracorporealshockwavetreatmentinerectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |