Cargando…

Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution

(1) Background: To expand the donor pool, greater donor hearts tended to be used in heart transplantation. However, the data about the feasibility of expanding the donor and recipient weight ratios (DRWRs. All donor and recipient weight ratio (DRWR) in this study or cited from other articles were co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ming, Xu, Li, Yu, Wenjing, Qian, Xingyu, Rao, Zhenqi, Tu, Jingrong, Dong, Nianguo, Li, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9050148
_version_ 1784716193092861952
author Chen, Ming
Xu, Li
Yu, Wenjing
Qian, Xingyu
Rao, Zhenqi
Tu, Jingrong
Dong, Nianguo
Li, Fei
author_facet Chen, Ming
Xu, Li
Yu, Wenjing
Qian, Xingyu
Rao, Zhenqi
Tu, Jingrong
Dong, Nianguo
Li, Fei
author_sort Chen, Ming
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: To expand the donor pool, greater donor hearts tended to be used in heart transplantation. However, the data about the feasibility of expanding the donor and recipient weight ratios (DRWRs. All donor and recipient weight ratio (DRWR) in this study or cited from other articles were converted to the DRWR calculated by ((donor weight-recipient weight)/recipient weight) × 100%.) to >30% was still scant in China’s pediatric heart transplantation (HTx). The potential risk increased along with the further expansion of the appropriate range of DRWR to >30% and its upper limit was still in debate. (2) Methods: Seventy-eight pediatric patients (age < 18 years) undergoing HTx between 2015 and 2020 at our center were divided into two groups based on the DRWR (>30% and ≤30%). Variables were summarized and analyzed via univariate analyses and multivariate analyses. A Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate survival and conditional survival. (3) Results: No significant difference was found in one-year, three-year or five-year survival between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: The expansion of DRWR to >30% was acceptable for China’s pediatric HTx. Notably, continuously liberalizing of the upper DRWR boundary to more than 200% could be used as a stop-loss option but should be applied with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9145031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91450312022-05-29 Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution Chen, Ming Xu, Li Yu, Wenjing Qian, Xingyu Rao, Zhenqi Tu, Jingrong Dong, Nianguo Li, Fei J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Article (1) Background: To expand the donor pool, greater donor hearts tended to be used in heart transplantation. However, the data about the feasibility of expanding the donor and recipient weight ratios (DRWRs. All donor and recipient weight ratio (DRWR) in this study or cited from other articles were converted to the DRWR calculated by ((donor weight-recipient weight)/recipient weight) × 100%.) to >30% was still scant in China’s pediatric heart transplantation (HTx). The potential risk increased along with the further expansion of the appropriate range of DRWR to >30% and its upper limit was still in debate. (2) Methods: Seventy-eight pediatric patients (age < 18 years) undergoing HTx between 2015 and 2020 at our center were divided into two groups based on the DRWR (>30% and ≤30%). Variables were summarized and analyzed via univariate analyses and multivariate analyses. A Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to calculate survival and conditional survival. (3) Results: No significant difference was found in one-year, three-year or five-year survival between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: The expansion of DRWR to >30% was acceptable for China’s pediatric HTx. Notably, continuously liberalizing of the upper DRWR boundary to more than 200% could be used as a stop-loss option but should be applied with caution. MDPI 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9145031/ /pubmed/35621859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9050148 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Ming
Xu, Li
Yu, Wenjing
Qian, Xingyu
Rao, Zhenqi
Tu, Jingrong
Dong, Nianguo
Li, Fei
Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution
title Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution
title_full Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution
title_fullStr Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution
title_full_unstemmed Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution
title_short Donor-Recipient Weight Match in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Liberalizing Weight Matching with Caution
title_sort donor-recipient weight match in pediatric heart transplantation: liberalizing weight matching with caution
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9050148
work_keys_str_mv AT chenming donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution
AT xuli donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution
AT yuwenjing donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution
AT qianxingyu donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution
AT raozhenqi donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution
AT tujingrong donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution
AT dongnianguo donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution
AT lifei donorrecipientweightmatchinpediatrichearttransplantationliberalizingweightmatchingwithcaution