Cargando…

Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida

(1) Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that every person aged six months and over receive the influenza vaccine every year. Previous studies indicate that rural-area residents have less access to preventative health care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Alalwan, Abdullah A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050669
_version_ 1784716207476178944
author Alalwan, Abdullah A.
author_facet Alalwan, Abdullah A.
author_sort Alalwan, Abdullah A.
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that every person aged six months and over receive the influenza vaccine every year. Previous studies indicate that rural-area residents have less access to preventative health care services. This study aims to examine the variation in influenza vaccine use among rural and urban counties in Florida. (2) Methods: The study studied 24,116 participants from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System database. The study included only patients who live in Florida. We performed logistic regression analysis using survey procedures available in SAS(®). Our regression model assessed the association between receiving the influenza vaccine and county status, age, income level, education level, and health coverage. We used ArcGIS software to create prevalence and vaccination maps. (3) Results: Of the total number of the study participants, 45.31% were residents of rural counties, and 54.69% were residents of urban counties. The logistic regression model showed no significant association between residing in rural counties and not receiving influenza vaccine in the past year (−0.05560, p-value = 0.0549). However, we found significant associations between not receiving influenza vaccine and age, high education level, and not having health care coverage (−0.0412, p-value < 0.0001; −0.04462, p-value = 0.0139; and 0.4956, p-value < 0.0001, respectively). (4) Conclusions: Our study did not find an association between influenza vaccine use among rural and urban residence. Increasing age, higher education, and having health care insurance had positive associations with influenza vaccine use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9145088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91450882022-05-29 Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida Alalwan, Abdullah A. Vaccines (Basel) Article (1) Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that every person aged six months and over receive the influenza vaccine every year. Previous studies indicate that rural-area residents have less access to preventative health care services. This study aims to examine the variation in influenza vaccine use among rural and urban counties in Florida. (2) Methods: The study studied 24,116 participants from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System database. The study included only patients who live in Florida. We performed logistic regression analysis using survey procedures available in SAS(®). Our regression model assessed the association between receiving the influenza vaccine and county status, age, income level, education level, and health coverage. We used ArcGIS software to create prevalence and vaccination maps. (3) Results: Of the total number of the study participants, 45.31% were residents of rural counties, and 54.69% were residents of urban counties. The logistic regression model showed no significant association between residing in rural counties and not receiving influenza vaccine in the past year (−0.05560, p-value = 0.0549). However, we found significant associations between not receiving influenza vaccine and age, high education level, and not having health care coverage (−0.0412, p-value < 0.0001; −0.04462, p-value = 0.0139; and 0.4956, p-value < 0.0001, respectively). (4) Conclusions: Our study did not find an association between influenza vaccine use among rural and urban residence. Increasing age, higher education, and having health care insurance had positive associations with influenza vaccine use. MDPI 2022-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9145088/ /pubmed/35632425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050669 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alalwan, Abdullah A.
Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida
title Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida
title_full Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida
title_fullStr Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida
title_full_unstemmed Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida
title_short Influenza Vaccine Utilization: A Comparison between Urban and Rural Counties in Florida
title_sort influenza vaccine utilization: a comparison between urban and rural counties in florida
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050669
work_keys_str_mv AT alalwanabdullaha influenzavaccineutilizationacomparisonbetweenurbanandruralcountiesinflorida