Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Liaison(®) Murex anti-HEV IgM and IgG assays running on the Liaison(®) instrument and compare the results with those obtained with Wantai HEV assays. We tested samples collected in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during the acute (HEV RNA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14051065 |
_version_ | 1784716235700699136 |
---|---|
author | Abravanel, Florence Parraud, Delphine Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine Miedouge, Marcel Bonnin, Estelle Larrieu, Margaux Aversenq, Alexandre Lhomme, Sébastien Izopet, Jacques |
author_facet | Abravanel, Florence Parraud, Delphine Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine Miedouge, Marcel Bonnin, Estelle Larrieu, Margaux Aversenq, Alexandre Lhomme, Sébastien Izopet, Jacques |
author_sort | Abravanel, Florence |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Liaison(®) Murex anti-HEV IgM and IgG assays running on the Liaison(®) instrument and compare the results with those obtained with Wantai HEV assays. We tested samples collected in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during the acute (HEV RNA positive, anti-HEV IgM positive) and the post-viremic phase (HEV RNA negative, anti-HEV IgM positive) of infections. The specificity was assessed by testing HEV RNA negative/anti-HEV IgG-IgM negative samples. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgM assay was 100% for acute-phase samples (56/56) and 57.4% (27/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 93.8% (30/32) for acute-phase (viremic) samples and 71%% (22/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgG assay was 100% for viremic samples (56/56) and 94.6% (43/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 84.3% (27/32) for viremic samples and 93.5% (29/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. Specificity was very high (>99%) in both populations. We checked the limit of detection stated for the Liaison(®) IgG assay (0.3 U/mL). The clinical performance of the Liaison(®) ANTI-HEV assays was good. These rapid, automated assays for detecting anti-HEV antibodies will greatly enhance the arsenal for diagnosing HEV infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9145211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91452112022-05-29 Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay Abravanel, Florence Parraud, Delphine Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine Miedouge, Marcel Bonnin, Estelle Larrieu, Margaux Aversenq, Alexandre Lhomme, Sébastien Izopet, Jacques Viruses Communication To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Liaison(®) Murex anti-HEV IgM and IgG assays running on the Liaison(®) instrument and compare the results with those obtained with Wantai HEV assays. We tested samples collected in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during the acute (HEV RNA positive, anti-HEV IgM positive) and the post-viremic phase (HEV RNA negative, anti-HEV IgM positive) of infections. The specificity was assessed by testing HEV RNA negative/anti-HEV IgG-IgM negative samples. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgM assay was 100% for acute-phase samples (56/56) and 57.4% (27/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 93.8% (30/32) for acute-phase (viremic) samples and 71%% (22/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgG assay was 100% for viremic samples (56/56) and 94.6% (43/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 84.3% (27/32) for viremic samples and 93.5% (29/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. Specificity was very high (>99%) in both populations. We checked the limit of detection stated for the Liaison(®) IgG assay (0.3 U/mL). The clinical performance of the Liaison(®) ANTI-HEV assays was good. These rapid, automated assays for detecting anti-HEV antibodies will greatly enhance the arsenal for diagnosing HEV infections. MDPI 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9145211/ /pubmed/35632806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14051065 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Abravanel, Florence Parraud, Delphine Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine Miedouge, Marcel Bonnin, Estelle Larrieu, Margaux Aversenq, Alexandre Lhomme, Sébastien Izopet, Jacques Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay |
title | Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of an automated system for assaying anti-hepatitis e virus immunoglobulins m and g compared with a conventional microplate assay |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14051065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abravanelflorence diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT parrauddelphine diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT chapuyregaudsabine diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT miedougemarcel diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT bonninestelle diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT larrieumargaux diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT aversenqalexandre diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT lhommesebastien diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay AT izopetjacques diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay |