Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Liaison(®) Murex anti-HEV IgM and IgG assays running on the Liaison(®) instrument and compare the results with those obtained with Wantai HEV assays. We tested samples collected in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during the acute (HEV RNA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abravanel, Florence, Parraud, Delphine, Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine, Miedouge, Marcel, Bonnin, Estelle, Larrieu, Margaux, Aversenq, Alexandre, Lhomme, Sébastien, Izopet, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14051065
_version_ 1784716235700699136
author Abravanel, Florence
Parraud, Delphine
Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine
Miedouge, Marcel
Bonnin, Estelle
Larrieu, Margaux
Aversenq, Alexandre
Lhomme, Sébastien
Izopet, Jacques
author_facet Abravanel, Florence
Parraud, Delphine
Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine
Miedouge, Marcel
Bonnin, Estelle
Larrieu, Margaux
Aversenq, Alexandre
Lhomme, Sébastien
Izopet, Jacques
author_sort Abravanel, Florence
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Liaison(®) Murex anti-HEV IgM and IgG assays running on the Liaison(®) instrument and compare the results with those obtained with Wantai HEV assays. We tested samples collected in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during the acute (HEV RNA positive, anti-HEV IgM positive) and the post-viremic phase (HEV RNA negative, anti-HEV IgM positive) of infections. The specificity was assessed by testing HEV RNA negative/anti-HEV IgG-IgM negative samples. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgM assay was 100% for acute-phase samples (56/56) and 57.4% (27/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 93.8% (30/32) for acute-phase (viremic) samples and 71%% (22/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgG assay was 100% for viremic samples (56/56) and 94.6% (43/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 84.3% (27/32) for viremic samples and 93.5% (29/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. Specificity was very high (>99%) in both populations. We checked the limit of detection stated for the Liaison(®) IgG assay (0.3 U/mL). The clinical performance of the Liaison(®) ANTI-HEV assays was good. These rapid, automated assays for detecting anti-HEV antibodies will greatly enhance the arsenal for diagnosing HEV infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9145211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91452112022-05-29 Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay Abravanel, Florence Parraud, Delphine Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine Miedouge, Marcel Bonnin, Estelle Larrieu, Margaux Aversenq, Alexandre Lhomme, Sébastien Izopet, Jacques Viruses Communication To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Liaison(®) Murex anti-HEV IgM and IgG assays running on the Liaison(®) instrument and compare the results with those obtained with Wantai HEV assays. We tested samples collected in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients during the acute (HEV RNA positive, anti-HEV IgM positive) and the post-viremic phase (HEV RNA negative, anti-HEV IgM positive) of infections. The specificity was assessed by testing HEV RNA negative/anti-HEV IgG-IgM negative samples. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgM assay was 100% for acute-phase samples (56/56) and 57.4% (27/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 93.8% (30/32) for acute-phase (viremic) samples and 71%% (22/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. The clinical sensitivity of the Liaison(®) IgG assay was 100% for viremic samples (56/56) and 94.6% (43/47) for post-viremic samples from immunocompetent patients. It was 84.3% (27/32) for viremic samples and 93.5% (29/31) for post-viremic samples from immunocompromised patients. Specificity was very high (>99%) in both populations. We checked the limit of detection stated for the Liaison(®) IgG assay (0.3 U/mL). The clinical performance of the Liaison(®) ANTI-HEV assays was good. These rapid, automated assays for detecting anti-HEV antibodies will greatly enhance the arsenal for diagnosing HEV infections. MDPI 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9145211/ /pubmed/35632806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14051065 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Abravanel, Florence
Parraud, Delphine
Chapuy-Regaud, Sabine
Miedouge, Marcel
Bonnin, Estelle
Larrieu, Margaux
Aversenq, Alexandre
Lhomme, Sébastien
Izopet, Jacques
Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay
title Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay
title_full Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay
title_short Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay
title_sort diagnostic performance of an automated system for assaying anti-hepatitis e virus immunoglobulins m and g compared with a conventional microplate assay
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14051065
work_keys_str_mv AT abravanelflorence diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT parrauddelphine diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT chapuyregaudsabine diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT miedougemarcel diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT bonninestelle diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT larrieumargaux diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT aversenqalexandre diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT lhommesebastien diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay
AT izopetjacques diagnosticperformanceofanautomatedsystemforassayingantihepatitisevirusimmunoglobulinsmandgcomparedwithaconventionalmicroplateassay