Cargando…

Structural Behavior of RC Beams Containing Unreinforced Drilled Openings with and without CFRP Strengthening

Construction deficiencies can cause serious problems that significantly decrease the design strength of concrete structures, such as the unreinforced drilled openings. With the absence of sufficient reinforcement, the stress concentrations generated around the opening corners produce cracks in the b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Sisi, Alaa A., El-Emam, Hesham M., El-Kholy, Abd El-Monem I., Ahmad, Seleem S., Sallam, Hossam M., Salim, Hani A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35631916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14102034
Descripción
Sumario:Construction deficiencies can cause serious problems that significantly decrease the design strength of concrete structures, such as the unreinforced drilled openings. With the absence of sufficient reinforcement, the stress concentrations generated around the opening corners produce cracks in the beams. The size and location of the opening significantly affect the behavior of the beam under static and dynamic load. In this work, an experimental and numerical program was performed to investigate the behavior of drilled reinforced concrete beams with and without strengthening using CFRP sheets. Energy absorption and SDOF analyses were performed to preliminary assess the behavior of the beams under the dynamic load, such as blast. One control beam without any openings, six beams with tension-zone openings, and six beams with shear-zone openings were tested. It was found that the samples with tension-zone openings were slightly affected by the opening, where the reduction in the ultimate strength was approximately 7 to 14%. The beams were able to recover up to 46% of the lost strength by CFRP strengthening. On the other hand, the shear-zone opening significantly decreased the strength and energy absorption and increased the blast response. It can be concluded that it is not recommended to drill any opening at the shear zone as strength loss can reach 57% even with the strengthening, especially for blast resisting structure; in addition, the strength recovered from approximately 11.95 to 32.46% only. The finite element model was able to predict the strength of the beams. The results were closer in the case of tension-zone opening than those in the case of the shear-zone opening. Shear cracks were observed at the corners of the openings even if the opening exists at the tension zone. A reduction in the density of cracks can be observed after the strengthening, where the FRP sheet decreases the stress in the concrete.