Cargando…

A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal

Conical implant–abutment connections are popular for their stability; however, in other conditions, such as excessive force, implants and abutments can absorb all the stress. Some connections with three points of support can resist more than conical connections. In recent years, different studies ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angeles Maslucan, Romy, Dominguez, John Alexis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103680
_version_ 1784716274514788352
author Angeles Maslucan, Romy
Dominguez, John Alexis
author_facet Angeles Maslucan, Romy
Dominguez, John Alexis
author_sort Angeles Maslucan, Romy
collection PubMed
description Conical implant–abutment connections are popular for their stability; however, in other conditions, such as excessive force, implants and abutments can absorb all the stress. Some connections with three points of support can resist more than conical connections. In recent years, different studies has shown that the design of a connection affects its stability. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the stresses in finite elements (FEs) in a newly proposed conical triangular connection in implants with hexagonal and conical connections. A nonlinear 3D FE parametric model was developed using SOLIDWORKS 2017(®). All the connections, i.e., external and internal hexagons, morse taper, conical connection, and the new conical triangular proposal were compared when axial forces of 150, 250, and 350 N were applied to the occlusal. The maximum stress was found in the external hexagon. The maximum stress was concentrated at the level of the neck of the abutment, implant, and bone, except for the morse taper; at the level of the crown and abutment, the lowest stress occurred in the new proposal. Conclusions: The new conical triangular (CT) connection and the conical connection (CC) generate similar stress in the implant, abutment, and crown. However, the CT connection improves the CC by reducing stress at the bone level, adding an advantage to having three retention points.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9145359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91453592022-05-29 A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal Angeles Maslucan, Romy Dominguez, John Alexis Materials (Basel) Article Conical implant–abutment connections are popular for their stability; however, in other conditions, such as excessive force, implants and abutments can absorb all the stress. Some connections with three points of support can resist more than conical connections. In recent years, different studies has shown that the design of a connection affects its stability. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the stresses in finite elements (FEs) in a newly proposed conical triangular connection in implants with hexagonal and conical connections. A nonlinear 3D FE parametric model was developed using SOLIDWORKS 2017(®). All the connections, i.e., external and internal hexagons, morse taper, conical connection, and the new conical triangular proposal were compared when axial forces of 150, 250, and 350 N were applied to the occlusal. The maximum stress was found in the external hexagon. The maximum stress was concentrated at the level of the neck of the abutment, implant, and bone, except for the morse taper; at the level of the crown and abutment, the lowest stress occurred in the new proposal. Conclusions: The new conical triangular (CT) connection and the conical connection (CC) generate similar stress in the implant, abutment, and crown. However, the CT connection improves the CC by reducing stress at the bone level, adding an advantage to having three retention points. MDPI 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9145359/ /pubmed/35629709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103680 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Angeles Maslucan, Romy
Dominguez, John Alexis
A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal
title A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal
title_full A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal
title_fullStr A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal
title_full_unstemmed A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal
title_short A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal
title_sort finite element stress analysis of a concical triangular connection in implants: a new proposal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103680
work_keys_str_mv AT angelesmaslucanromy afiniteelementstressanalysisofaconcicaltriangularconnectioninimplantsanewproposal
AT dominguezjohnalexis afiniteelementstressanalysisofaconcicaltriangularconnectioninimplantsanewproposal
AT angelesmaslucanromy finiteelementstressanalysisofaconcicaltriangularconnectioninimplantsanewproposal
AT dominguezjohnalexis finiteelementstressanalysisofaconcicaltriangularconnectioninimplantsanewproposal