Cargando…

Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men

OBJECTIVE: Most of the previous risk prediction models for lung cancer were developed from smokers, with discriminatory power ranging from 0.57 to 0.72. We constructed an individual risk prediction model for lung cancer among the male general population of Hong Kong. METHODS: Epidemiological data of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tse, Lap Ah, Wang, Feng, Wong, Martin Chi-sang, Au, Joseph Siu-kei, Yu, Ignatius Tak-sun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09678-y
_version_ 1784716320593412096
author Tse, Lap Ah
Wang, Feng
Wong, Martin Chi-sang
Au, Joseph Siu-kei
Yu, Ignatius Tak-sun
author_facet Tse, Lap Ah
Wang, Feng
Wong, Martin Chi-sang
Au, Joseph Siu-kei
Yu, Ignatius Tak-sun
author_sort Tse, Lap Ah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Most of the previous risk prediction models for lung cancer were developed from smokers, with discriminatory power ranging from 0.57 to 0.72. We constructed an individual risk prediction model for lung cancer among the male general population of Hong Kong. METHODS: Epidemiological data of 1,069 histology confirmed male lung cancer cases and 1,208 community controls were included in this analysis. Residential radon exposure was retrospectively reconstructed based on individual lifetime residential information. Multivariable logistic regression with repeated cross-validation method was used to select optimal risk predictors for each prediction model for different smoking strata. Individual absolute risk for lung cancer was estimated by Gail model. Receiver-operator characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) and confusion matrix were evaluated to demonstrate the model performance and ability to differentiate cases from non-cases. RESULTS: Smoking and smoking cessation, education, lung disease history, family history of cancer, residential radon exposure, dietary habits, carcinogens exposure, mask use and dust control in workplace were selected as the risk predictors for lung cancer. The AUC of estimated absolute risk for all lung cancers was 0.735 (95% CI: 0.714–0.756). Using 2.83% as the cutoff point of absolute risk, the predictive accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.715, 0.818 and 0.674, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed a risk prediction model with moderate discrimination for lung cancer among Hong Kong males. External validation in other populations is warranted for this model in future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09678-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9145456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91454562022-05-29 Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men Tse, Lap Ah Wang, Feng Wong, Martin Chi-sang Au, Joseph Siu-kei Yu, Ignatius Tak-sun BMC Cancer Research OBJECTIVE: Most of the previous risk prediction models for lung cancer were developed from smokers, with discriminatory power ranging from 0.57 to 0.72. We constructed an individual risk prediction model for lung cancer among the male general population of Hong Kong. METHODS: Epidemiological data of 1,069 histology confirmed male lung cancer cases and 1,208 community controls were included in this analysis. Residential radon exposure was retrospectively reconstructed based on individual lifetime residential information. Multivariable logistic regression with repeated cross-validation method was used to select optimal risk predictors for each prediction model for different smoking strata. Individual absolute risk for lung cancer was estimated by Gail model. Receiver-operator characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) and confusion matrix were evaluated to demonstrate the model performance and ability to differentiate cases from non-cases. RESULTS: Smoking and smoking cessation, education, lung disease history, family history of cancer, residential radon exposure, dietary habits, carcinogens exposure, mask use and dust control in workplace were selected as the risk predictors for lung cancer. The AUC of estimated absolute risk for all lung cancers was 0.735 (95% CI: 0.714–0.756). Using 2.83% as the cutoff point of absolute risk, the predictive accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.715, 0.818 and 0.674, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed a risk prediction model with moderate discrimination for lung cancer among Hong Kong males. External validation in other populations is warranted for this model in future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09678-y. BioMed Central 2022-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9145456/ /pubmed/35643456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09678-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tse, Lap Ah
Wang, Feng
Wong, Martin Chi-sang
Au, Joseph Siu-kei
Yu, Ignatius Tak-sun
Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men
title Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men
title_full Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men
title_fullStr Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men
title_short Risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among Hong Kong Chinese men
title_sort risk assessment and prediction for lung cancer among hong kong chinese men
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09678-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tselapah riskassessmentandpredictionforlungcanceramonghongkongchinesemen
AT wangfeng riskassessmentandpredictionforlungcanceramonghongkongchinesemen
AT wongmartinchisang riskassessmentandpredictionforlungcanceramonghongkongchinesemen
AT aujosephsiukei riskassessmentandpredictionforlungcanceramonghongkongchinesemen
AT yuignatiustaksun riskassessmentandpredictionforlungcanceramonghongkongchinesemen