Cargando…

The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation

Purpose: Advances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foss, Kimberly S., O’Daniel, Julianne M., Berg, Jonathan S., Powell, Sabrina N., Cadigan, Rosemary Jean, Kuczynski, Kristine J., Milko, Laura V., Saylor, Katherine W., Roberts, Megan, Weck, Karen, Henderson, Gail E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629115
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050692
_version_ 1784716376642945024
author Foss, Kimberly S.
O’Daniel, Julianne M.
Berg, Jonathan S.
Powell, Sabrina N.
Cadigan, Rosemary Jean
Kuczynski, Kristine J.
Milko, Laura V.
Saylor, Katherine W.
Roberts, Megan
Weck, Karen
Henderson, Gail E.
author_facet Foss, Kimberly S.
O’Daniel, Julianne M.
Berg, Jonathan S.
Powell, Sabrina N.
Cadigan, Rosemary Jean
Kuczynski, Kristine J.
Milko, Laura V.
Saylor, Katherine W.
Roberts, Megan
Weck, Karen
Henderson, Gail E.
author_sort Foss, Kimberly S.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Advances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can be difficult to find information on current implementation efforts and best practices, particularly in light of critical questions about equity, cost, and benefit. Methods: In 2020, we searched publicly available information on the Internet and the scientific literature to identify programs and collect information, including: setting, program funding, targeted population, test offered, and patient cost. Program representatives were contacted throughout 2020 and 2021 to clarify, update, and supplement the publicly available information. Results: Twelve programs were identified. Information was available on key program features, such as setting, genes tested, and target populations. Data on costs, outcomes, or long-term sustainability plans were not always available. Most programs offered testing at no or significantly reduced cost due to generous pilot funding, although the sustainability of these programs remains unknown. Gene testing lists were diverse, ranging from 11 genes (CDC tier 1 genes) to 59 genes (ACMG secondary findings list v.2) to broad exome and genome sequencing. This diversity presents challenges for harmonized data collection and assessment of program outcomes. Conclusions: Early programs are exploring the logistics and utility of population genomic screening in various settings. Coordinated efforts are needed to take advantage of data collected about uptake, infrastructure, and intervention outcomes to inform future research, evaluation, and program development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9145687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91456872022-05-29 The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation Foss, Kimberly S. O’Daniel, Julianne M. Berg, Jonathan S. Powell, Sabrina N. Cadigan, Rosemary Jean Kuczynski, Kristine J. Milko, Laura V. Saylor, Katherine W. Roberts, Megan Weck, Karen Henderson, Gail E. J Pers Med Article Purpose: Advances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can be difficult to find information on current implementation efforts and best practices, particularly in light of critical questions about equity, cost, and benefit. Methods: In 2020, we searched publicly available information on the Internet and the scientific literature to identify programs and collect information, including: setting, program funding, targeted population, test offered, and patient cost. Program representatives were contacted throughout 2020 and 2021 to clarify, update, and supplement the publicly available information. Results: Twelve programs were identified. Information was available on key program features, such as setting, genes tested, and target populations. Data on costs, outcomes, or long-term sustainability plans were not always available. Most programs offered testing at no or significantly reduced cost due to generous pilot funding, although the sustainability of these programs remains unknown. Gene testing lists were diverse, ranging from 11 genes (CDC tier 1 genes) to 59 genes (ACMG secondary findings list v.2) to broad exome and genome sequencing. This diversity presents challenges for harmonized data collection and assessment of program outcomes. Conclusions: Early programs are exploring the logistics and utility of population genomic screening in various settings. Coordinated efforts are needed to take advantage of data collected about uptake, infrastructure, and intervention outcomes to inform future research, evaluation, and program development. MDPI 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9145687/ /pubmed/35629115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050692 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Foss, Kimberly S.
O’Daniel, Julianne M.
Berg, Jonathan S.
Powell, Sabrina N.
Cadigan, Rosemary Jean
Kuczynski, Kristine J.
Milko, Laura V.
Saylor, Katherine W.
Roberts, Megan
Weck, Karen
Henderson, Gail E.
The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation
title The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation
title_full The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation
title_fullStr The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation
title_full_unstemmed The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation
title_short The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation
title_sort rise of population genomic screening: characteristics of current programs and the need for evidence regarding optimal implementation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629115
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050692
work_keys_str_mv AT fosskimberlys theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT odanieljuliannem theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT bergjonathans theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT powellsabrinan theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT cadiganrosemaryjean theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT kuczynskikristinej theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT milkolaurav theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT saylorkatherinew theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT robertsmegan theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT weckkaren theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT hendersongaile theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT fosskimberlys riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT odanieljuliannem riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT bergjonathans riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT powellsabrinan riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT cadiganrosemaryjean riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT kuczynskikristinej riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT milkolaurav riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT saylorkatherinew riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT robertsmegan riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT weckkaren riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation
AT hendersongaile riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation