Cargando…
The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation
Purpose: Advances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050692 |
_version_ | 1784716376642945024 |
---|---|
author | Foss, Kimberly S. O’Daniel, Julianne M. Berg, Jonathan S. Powell, Sabrina N. Cadigan, Rosemary Jean Kuczynski, Kristine J. Milko, Laura V. Saylor, Katherine W. Roberts, Megan Weck, Karen Henderson, Gail E. |
author_facet | Foss, Kimberly S. O’Daniel, Julianne M. Berg, Jonathan S. Powell, Sabrina N. Cadigan, Rosemary Jean Kuczynski, Kristine J. Milko, Laura V. Saylor, Katherine W. Roberts, Megan Weck, Karen Henderson, Gail E. |
author_sort | Foss, Kimberly S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Advances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can be difficult to find information on current implementation efforts and best practices, particularly in light of critical questions about equity, cost, and benefit. Methods: In 2020, we searched publicly available information on the Internet and the scientific literature to identify programs and collect information, including: setting, program funding, targeted population, test offered, and patient cost. Program representatives were contacted throughout 2020 and 2021 to clarify, update, and supplement the publicly available information. Results: Twelve programs were identified. Information was available on key program features, such as setting, genes tested, and target populations. Data on costs, outcomes, or long-term sustainability plans were not always available. Most programs offered testing at no or significantly reduced cost due to generous pilot funding, although the sustainability of these programs remains unknown. Gene testing lists were diverse, ranging from 11 genes (CDC tier 1 genes) to 59 genes (ACMG secondary findings list v.2) to broad exome and genome sequencing. This diversity presents challenges for harmonized data collection and assessment of program outcomes. Conclusions: Early programs are exploring the logistics and utility of population genomic screening in various settings. Coordinated efforts are needed to take advantage of data collected about uptake, infrastructure, and intervention outcomes to inform future research, evaluation, and program development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9145687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91456872022-05-29 The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation Foss, Kimberly S. O’Daniel, Julianne M. Berg, Jonathan S. Powell, Sabrina N. Cadigan, Rosemary Jean Kuczynski, Kristine J. Milko, Laura V. Saylor, Katherine W. Roberts, Megan Weck, Karen Henderson, Gail E. J Pers Med Article Purpose: Advances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can be difficult to find information on current implementation efforts and best practices, particularly in light of critical questions about equity, cost, and benefit. Methods: In 2020, we searched publicly available information on the Internet and the scientific literature to identify programs and collect information, including: setting, program funding, targeted population, test offered, and patient cost. Program representatives were contacted throughout 2020 and 2021 to clarify, update, and supplement the publicly available information. Results: Twelve programs were identified. Information was available on key program features, such as setting, genes tested, and target populations. Data on costs, outcomes, or long-term sustainability plans were not always available. Most programs offered testing at no or significantly reduced cost due to generous pilot funding, although the sustainability of these programs remains unknown. Gene testing lists were diverse, ranging from 11 genes (CDC tier 1 genes) to 59 genes (ACMG secondary findings list v.2) to broad exome and genome sequencing. This diversity presents challenges for harmonized data collection and assessment of program outcomes. Conclusions: Early programs are exploring the logistics and utility of population genomic screening in various settings. Coordinated efforts are needed to take advantage of data collected about uptake, infrastructure, and intervention outcomes to inform future research, evaluation, and program development. MDPI 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9145687/ /pubmed/35629115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050692 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Foss, Kimberly S. O’Daniel, Julianne M. Berg, Jonathan S. Powell, Sabrina N. Cadigan, Rosemary Jean Kuczynski, Kristine J. Milko, Laura V. Saylor, Katherine W. Roberts, Megan Weck, Karen Henderson, Gail E. The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation |
title | The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation |
title_full | The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation |
title_fullStr | The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation |
title_short | The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation |
title_sort | rise of population genomic screening: characteristics of current programs and the need for evidence regarding optimal implementation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050692 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fosskimberlys theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT odanieljuliannem theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT bergjonathans theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT powellsabrinan theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT cadiganrosemaryjean theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT kuczynskikristinej theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT milkolaurav theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT saylorkatherinew theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT robertsmegan theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT weckkaren theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT hendersongaile theriseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT fosskimberlys riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT odanieljuliannem riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT bergjonathans riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT powellsabrinan riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT cadiganrosemaryjean riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT kuczynskikristinej riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT milkolaurav riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT saylorkatherinew riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT robertsmegan riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT weckkaren riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation AT hendersongaile riseofpopulationgenomicscreeningcharacteristicsofcurrentprogramsandtheneedforevidenceregardingoptimalimplementation |