Cargando…
Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study
The vertical position concerning the bone in which the implants are placed has been related as one of the factors causing marginal bone loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone loss that occurs before prosthetic loading around tapered internal connection (CIC) implants placed at th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103729 |
_version_ | 1784716399365586944 |
---|---|
author | Palacios-Garzón, Natalia Mauri-Obradors, Elisabeth Ayuso-Montero, Raúl Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Anglada-Cantarell, José María López-López, José |
author_facet | Palacios-Garzón, Natalia Mauri-Obradors, Elisabeth Ayuso-Montero, Raúl Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Anglada-Cantarell, José María López-López, José |
author_sort | Palacios-Garzón, Natalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The vertical position concerning the bone in which the implants are placed has been related as one of the factors causing marginal bone loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone loss that occurs before prosthetic loading around tapered internal connection (CIC) implants placed at the crestal (C) and subcrestal (S) levels. Method: A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was carried out, with a sample size of 62 implants placed in 27 patients who underwent radiological controls on the day of placement, at one month, and at 4 months, and stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) on three occasions. Results: Bone loss in implants C and S from the time of placement (T0) and the month after (T1) was not significant (p = 0.54) (C = 0.19 mm and S = 0.15 mm). The difference between one month (T1) and four months (T2) (C = 0.17 mm and S = 0.22 mm) was not significant either (p = 0.26). The difference between the day of placement (T0) and the third and last measurement (T2) was almost null (p = 0.94) (C = 0.35 mm and S = 0.36). The overall success rate of the implants was 97.8%. The stability of the implants measured with RFA went from 70.60 (T0) to 73.16 (T1) and 74.52 (T2). Conclusions: No significant differences were found in the bone loss for implants placed at the C and S levels. The millimeters of bone loss detected in both vertical positions did not have a significant impact on the stability of the implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9145780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91457802022-05-29 Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study Palacios-Garzón, Natalia Mauri-Obradors, Elisabeth Ayuso-Montero, Raúl Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Anglada-Cantarell, José María López-López, José Materials (Basel) Article The vertical position concerning the bone in which the implants are placed has been related as one of the factors causing marginal bone loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone loss that occurs before prosthetic loading around tapered internal connection (CIC) implants placed at the crestal (C) and subcrestal (S) levels. Method: A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was carried out, with a sample size of 62 implants placed in 27 patients who underwent radiological controls on the day of placement, at one month, and at 4 months, and stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) on three occasions. Results: Bone loss in implants C and S from the time of placement (T0) and the month after (T1) was not significant (p = 0.54) (C = 0.19 mm and S = 0.15 mm). The difference between one month (T1) and four months (T2) (C = 0.17 mm and S = 0.22 mm) was not significant either (p = 0.26). The difference between the day of placement (T0) and the third and last measurement (T2) was almost null (p = 0.94) (C = 0.35 mm and S = 0.36). The overall success rate of the implants was 97.8%. The stability of the implants measured with RFA went from 70.60 (T0) to 73.16 (T1) and 74.52 (T2). Conclusions: No significant differences were found in the bone loss for implants placed at the C and S levels. The millimeters of bone loss detected in both vertical positions did not have a significant impact on the stability of the implants. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9145780/ /pubmed/35629754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103729 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Palacios-Garzón, Natalia Mauri-Obradors, Elisabeth Ayuso-Montero, Raúl Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Anglada-Cantarell, José María López-López, José Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title | Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_full | Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_fullStr | Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_short | Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_sort | marginal bone loss in internal conical connection implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal levels before prosthetic loading: a randomized clinical study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palaciosgarzonnatalia marginalbonelossininternalconicalconnectionimplantsplacedatthecrestalandsubcrestallevelsbeforeprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy AT mauriobradorselisabeth marginalbonelossininternalconicalconnectionimplantsplacedatthecrestalandsubcrestallevelsbeforeprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy AT ayusomonteroraul marginalbonelossininternalconicalconnectionimplantsplacedatthecrestalandsubcrestallevelsbeforeprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy AT velascoortegaeugenio marginalbonelossininternalconicalconnectionimplantsplacedatthecrestalandsubcrestallevelsbeforeprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy AT angladacantarelljosemaria marginalbonelossininternalconicalconnectionimplantsplacedatthecrestalandsubcrestallevelsbeforeprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy AT lopezlopezjose marginalbonelossininternalconicalconnectionimplantsplacedatthecrestalandsubcrestallevelsbeforeprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy |