Cargando…

Deep Fat Saving Elevation of the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap

Background and Objectives: Prolonged drain stay and lymphorrhea are often problems at the donor site of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap. This study aimed to introduce a novel technique of the SCIP flap elevation: Deep Fat Saving (DFS) technique. Materials and Methods:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuse, Yuma, Yoshimatsu, Hidehiko, Karakawa, Ryo, Yano, Tomoyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9145857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050670
Descripción
Sumario:Background and Objectives: Prolonged drain stay and lymphorrhea are often problems at the donor site of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap. This study aimed to introduce a novel technique of the SCIP flap elevation: Deep Fat Saving (DFS) technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients who underwent the SCIP flap transfer were divided based on the flap-elevated layer: above the deep fascia or the Camper fascia saving the deep fat. The duration of drain stay and the rates of flap survival and donor-site complications were compared between the groups. The inverse probability weighting (IPW) method was conducted to balance confounders. Results: By IPW, two balanced pseudo-populations were created: DFS = 33.9 and Conventional = 31.3. There were no significant differences in the rate of flap survival (DFS: 100% verses Conventional: 95.8%, p = 0.32) and donor site complications (DFS: 2.4% versus Conventional: 1.3%, p = 0.68, respectively). The duration of drain stay was shorter in the DFS group (weighted median: 6 versus 8 days; weighted difference: −1.6 days (95% confidence interval: −2.8 to −0.4), p = 0.01). Conclusions: An SCIP flap can be reliably harvested using the Deep Fat Saving technique.