Cargando…
Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature
Critical appraisal of the available literature for the treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is lacking. This critical review aimed to evaluate the current literature and provide treatment recommendations and possible suggestions for future canine OMM research. PubMed, Web of Science and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050196 |
_version_ | 1784716704052412416 |
---|---|
author | Pazzi, Paolo Steenkamp, Gerhard Rixon, Anouska J. |
author_facet | Pazzi, Paolo Steenkamp, Gerhard Rixon, Anouska J. |
author_sort | Pazzi, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Critical appraisal of the available literature for the treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is lacking. This critical review aimed to evaluate the current literature and provide treatment recommendations and possible suggestions for future canine OMM research. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched in June 2021, for terms relevant to treatment of OMM. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and information on clinical response and outcome extracted. Eighty-one studies were included. The overall level of evidence supporting the various canine OMM treatment options was low. The majority of studies included confounding treatment modalities and lacked randomization, control groups and consistency in reporting clinical response and outcomes. Within these limitations, surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. Adjunctive radiotherapy provided good local control and improved median survival times (MST), chemotherapy did not offer survival benefit beyond that of surgery, while electrochemotherapy may offer a potential alternative to radiotherapy. Immunotherapy holds the most promise in extending MST in the surgical adjunctive setting, in particular the combination of gene therapy and autologous vaccination. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trials, with a lack of confounding factors and reporting based on established guidelines would allow comparison and recommendations for the treatment of canine OMM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9147014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91470142022-05-29 Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature Pazzi, Paolo Steenkamp, Gerhard Rixon, Anouska J. Vet Sci Review Critical appraisal of the available literature for the treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is lacking. This critical review aimed to evaluate the current literature and provide treatment recommendations and possible suggestions for future canine OMM research. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched in June 2021, for terms relevant to treatment of OMM. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and information on clinical response and outcome extracted. Eighty-one studies were included. The overall level of evidence supporting the various canine OMM treatment options was low. The majority of studies included confounding treatment modalities and lacked randomization, control groups and consistency in reporting clinical response and outcomes. Within these limitations, surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. Adjunctive radiotherapy provided good local control and improved median survival times (MST), chemotherapy did not offer survival benefit beyond that of surgery, while electrochemotherapy may offer a potential alternative to radiotherapy. Immunotherapy holds the most promise in extending MST in the surgical adjunctive setting, in particular the combination of gene therapy and autologous vaccination. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trials, with a lack of confounding factors and reporting based on established guidelines would allow comparison and recommendations for the treatment of canine OMM. MDPI 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9147014/ /pubmed/35622724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050196 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Pazzi, Paolo Steenkamp, Gerhard Rixon, Anouska J. Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature |
title | Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature |
title_full | Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature |
title_short | Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature |
title_sort | treatment of canine oral melanomas: a critical review of the literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pazzipaolo treatmentofcanineoralmelanomasacriticalreviewoftheliterature AT steenkampgerhard treatmentofcanineoralmelanomasacriticalreviewoftheliterature AT rixonanouskaj treatmentofcanineoralmelanomasacriticalreviewoftheliterature |