Cargando…

Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature

Critical appraisal of the available literature for the treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is lacking. This critical review aimed to evaluate the current literature and provide treatment recommendations and possible suggestions for future canine OMM research. PubMed, Web of Science and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pazzi, Paolo, Steenkamp, Gerhard, Rixon, Anouska J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050196
_version_ 1784716704052412416
author Pazzi, Paolo
Steenkamp, Gerhard
Rixon, Anouska J.
author_facet Pazzi, Paolo
Steenkamp, Gerhard
Rixon, Anouska J.
author_sort Pazzi, Paolo
collection PubMed
description Critical appraisal of the available literature for the treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is lacking. This critical review aimed to evaluate the current literature and provide treatment recommendations and possible suggestions for future canine OMM research. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched in June 2021, for terms relevant to treatment of OMM. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and information on clinical response and outcome extracted. Eighty-one studies were included. The overall level of evidence supporting the various canine OMM treatment options was low. The majority of studies included confounding treatment modalities and lacked randomization, control groups and consistency in reporting clinical response and outcomes. Within these limitations, surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. Adjunctive radiotherapy provided good local control and improved median survival times (MST), chemotherapy did not offer survival benefit beyond that of surgery, while electrochemotherapy may offer a potential alternative to radiotherapy. Immunotherapy holds the most promise in extending MST in the surgical adjunctive setting, in particular the combination of gene therapy and autologous vaccination. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trials, with a lack of confounding factors and reporting based on established guidelines would allow comparison and recommendations for the treatment of canine OMM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9147014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91470142022-05-29 Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature Pazzi, Paolo Steenkamp, Gerhard Rixon, Anouska J. Vet Sci Review Critical appraisal of the available literature for the treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is lacking. This critical review aimed to evaluate the current literature and provide treatment recommendations and possible suggestions for future canine OMM research. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched in June 2021, for terms relevant to treatment of OMM. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and information on clinical response and outcome extracted. Eighty-one studies were included. The overall level of evidence supporting the various canine OMM treatment options was low. The majority of studies included confounding treatment modalities and lacked randomization, control groups and consistency in reporting clinical response and outcomes. Within these limitations, surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. Adjunctive radiotherapy provided good local control and improved median survival times (MST), chemotherapy did not offer survival benefit beyond that of surgery, while electrochemotherapy may offer a potential alternative to radiotherapy. Immunotherapy holds the most promise in extending MST in the surgical adjunctive setting, in particular the combination of gene therapy and autologous vaccination. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trials, with a lack of confounding factors and reporting based on established guidelines would allow comparison and recommendations for the treatment of canine OMM. MDPI 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9147014/ /pubmed/35622724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050196 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pazzi, Paolo
Steenkamp, Gerhard
Rixon, Anouska J.
Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature
title Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_full Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_short Treatment of Canine Oral Melanomas: A Critical Review of the Literature
title_sort treatment of canine oral melanomas: a critical review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050196
work_keys_str_mv AT pazzipaolo treatmentofcanineoralmelanomasacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT steenkampgerhard treatmentofcanineoralmelanomasacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT rixonanouskaj treatmentofcanineoralmelanomasacriticalreviewoftheliterature