Cargando…
Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
Osseodensification is a new method of bone instrumentation for dental implant placement that preserves bulk bone and increases primary implant stability, and may accelerate the implant rehabilitation treatment period and provide higher success and survival rates than conventional methods. The aim of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103539 |
_version_ | 1784716720542318592 |
---|---|
author | de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Moraschini, Vittorio Shibli, Jamil Awad Neiva, Rodrigo |
author_facet | de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Moraschini, Vittorio Shibli, Jamil Awad Neiva, Rodrigo |
author_sort | de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Osseodensification is a new method of bone instrumentation for dental implant placement that preserves bulk bone and increases primary implant stability, and may accelerate the implant rehabilitation treatment period and provide higher success and survival rates than conventional methods. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and discuss results obtained on immediate implant placement with immediate and delayed loading protocols under Osseodensification bone instrumentation. This study included private practice patients that required dental implant rehabilitation, between February 2017 and October 2019. All implants were placed under Osseodensification and had to be in function for at least 12 months to be included on the study. A total of 211 implants were included in the study, with a 98.1% total survival rate (97.9% in the maxilla and 98.5% in the mandible). For immediate implants with immediate load, 99.2% survival rate was achieved, and 100% survival rate for immediate implant placement without immediate load cases. A total of four implants were lost during this period, and all of them were lost within two months after placement. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Osseodensification bone instrumentation provided similar or better results on survival rates than conventional bone instrumentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9147081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91470812022-05-29 Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Moraschini, Vittorio Shibli, Jamil Awad Neiva, Rodrigo Materials (Basel) Article Osseodensification is a new method of bone instrumentation for dental implant placement that preserves bulk bone and increases primary implant stability, and may accelerate the implant rehabilitation treatment period and provide higher success and survival rates than conventional methods. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and discuss results obtained on immediate implant placement with immediate and delayed loading protocols under Osseodensification bone instrumentation. This study included private practice patients that required dental implant rehabilitation, between February 2017 and October 2019. All implants were placed under Osseodensification and had to be in function for at least 12 months to be included on the study. A total of 211 implants were included in the study, with a 98.1% total survival rate (97.9% in the maxilla and 98.5% in the mandible). For immediate implants with immediate load, 99.2% survival rate was achieved, and 100% survival rate for immediate implant placement without immediate load cases. A total of four implants were lost during this period, and all of them were lost within two months after placement. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Osseodensification bone instrumentation provided similar or better results on survival rates than conventional bone instrumentation. MDPI 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9147081/ /pubmed/35629566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103539 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Moraschini, Vittorio Shibli, Jamil Awad Neiva, Rodrigo Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants |
title | Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants |
title_full | Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants |
title_fullStr | Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants |
title_short | Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants |
title_sort | effects of osseodensification on immediate implant placement: retrospective analysis of 211 implants |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decarvalhoformigamarcio effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants AT grzechlesniakkinga effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants AT moraschinivittorio effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants AT shiblijamilawad effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants AT neivarodrigo effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants |