Cargando…

Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants

Osseodensification is a new method of bone instrumentation for dental implant placement that preserves bulk bone and increases primary implant stability, and may accelerate the implant rehabilitation treatment period and provide higher success and survival rates than conventional methods. The aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio, Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga, Moraschini, Vittorio, Shibli, Jamil Awad, Neiva, Rodrigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103539
_version_ 1784716720542318592
author de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio
Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga
Moraschini, Vittorio
Shibli, Jamil Awad
Neiva, Rodrigo
author_facet de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio
Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga
Moraschini, Vittorio
Shibli, Jamil Awad
Neiva, Rodrigo
author_sort de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio
collection PubMed
description Osseodensification is a new method of bone instrumentation for dental implant placement that preserves bulk bone and increases primary implant stability, and may accelerate the implant rehabilitation treatment period and provide higher success and survival rates than conventional methods. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and discuss results obtained on immediate implant placement with immediate and delayed loading protocols under Osseodensification bone instrumentation. This study included private practice patients that required dental implant rehabilitation, between February 2017 and October 2019. All implants were placed under Osseodensification and had to be in function for at least 12 months to be included on the study. A total of 211 implants were included in the study, with a 98.1% total survival rate (97.9% in the maxilla and 98.5% in the mandible). For immediate implants with immediate load, 99.2% survival rate was achieved, and 100% survival rate for immediate implant placement without immediate load cases. A total of four implants were lost during this period, and all of them were lost within two months after placement. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Osseodensification bone instrumentation provided similar or better results on survival rates than conventional bone instrumentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9147081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91470812022-05-29 Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Moraschini, Vittorio Shibli, Jamil Awad Neiva, Rodrigo Materials (Basel) Article Osseodensification is a new method of bone instrumentation for dental implant placement that preserves bulk bone and increases primary implant stability, and may accelerate the implant rehabilitation treatment period and provide higher success and survival rates than conventional methods. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and discuss results obtained on immediate implant placement with immediate and delayed loading protocols under Osseodensification bone instrumentation. This study included private practice patients that required dental implant rehabilitation, between February 2017 and October 2019. All implants were placed under Osseodensification and had to be in function for at least 12 months to be included on the study. A total of 211 implants were included in the study, with a 98.1% total survival rate (97.9% in the maxilla and 98.5% in the mandible). For immediate implants with immediate load, 99.2% survival rate was achieved, and 100% survival rate for immediate implant placement without immediate load cases. A total of four implants were lost during this period, and all of them were lost within two months after placement. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Osseodensification bone instrumentation provided similar or better results on survival rates than conventional bone instrumentation. MDPI 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9147081/ /pubmed/35629566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103539 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Carvalho Formiga, Márcio
Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga
Moraschini, Vittorio
Shibli, Jamil Awad
Neiva, Rodrigo
Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
title Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
title_full Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
title_fullStr Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
title_short Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants
title_sort effects of osseodensification on immediate implant placement: retrospective analysis of 211 implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103539
work_keys_str_mv AT decarvalhoformigamarcio effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants
AT grzechlesniakkinga effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants
AT moraschinivittorio effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants
AT shiblijamilawad effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants
AT neivarodrigo effectsofosseodensificationonimmediateimplantplacementretrospectiveanalysisof211implants