Cargando…

The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour

Solution mixing, which is one of the standard methods of producing Graphene−based Nanocomposites (GPC) may not be as efficient as it is expected due to the presence of residual solvent in the cured product. Therefore, the influence of including acetone in the preparation of Graphene Oxide−based epox...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Othman, Nurul Husna, Mustapha, Mazli, Sallih, Nabihah, Ahmad, Azlan, Mustapha, Faizal, Ismail, Mokhtar Che
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103445
_version_ 1784716770951561216
author Othman, Nurul Husna
Mustapha, Mazli
Sallih, Nabihah
Ahmad, Azlan
Mustapha, Faizal
Ismail, Mokhtar Che
author_facet Othman, Nurul Husna
Mustapha, Mazli
Sallih, Nabihah
Ahmad, Azlan
Mustapha, Faizal
Ismail, Mokhtar Che
author_sort Othman, Nurul Husna
collection PubMed
description Solution mixing, which is one of the standard methods of producing Graphene−based Nanocomposites (GPC) may not be as efficient as it is expected due to the presence of residual solvent in the cured product. Therefore, the influence of including acetone in the preparation of Graphene Oxide−based epoxy coating (GO−EP) on the curing behaviour, mechanical and corrosive behaviour was studied. FTIR and TGA analysis confirmed that the GO−EP prepared by ultrasonication (GO−EP U) indicated the presence of more low−molecular−weight/low crosslinked (LMW/LC) sites than GO−EP prepared by stirring (GO−EP MS). Meanwhile, the tensile strength and hardness of GO−EP MS was 20% and 10% better than GO−EP U which confirmed that the presence of a lower number of LMW/LC could prevail over the agglomeration of GO sheets in the GO−EP MS. Pull−off adhesion tests also confirms that the presence of remaining acetone would cause the poor bonding between metal and coating in GO−EP U. This is reflected on the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results, where the GO−EP U failed to provide substantial barrier protection for carbon steel after 140 days of immersion in 3.5 wt% NaCl. Therefore, it is essential to consider the solvent effect when solvent is used in the preparation of a coating to prevent the premature failure of high−performance polymer coatings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9147290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91472902022-05-29 The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour Othman, Nurul Husna Mustapha, Mazli Sallih, Nabihah Ahmad, Azlan Mustapha, Faizal Ismail, Mokhtar Che Materials (Basel) Article Solution mixing, which is one of the standard methods of producing Graphene−based Nanocomposites (GPC) may not be as efficient as it is expected due to the presence of residual solvent in the cured product. Therefore, the influence of including acetone in the preparation of Graphene Oxide−based epoxy coating (GO−EP) on the curing behaviour, mechanical and corrosive behaviour was studied. FTIR and TGA analysis confirmed that the GO−EP prepared by ultrasonication (GO−EP U) indicated the presence of more low−molecular−weight/low crosslinked (LMW/LC) sites than GO−EP prepared by stirring (GO−EP MS). Meanwhile, the tensile strength and hardness of GO−EP MS was 20% and 10% better than GO−EP U which confirmed that the presence of a lower number of LMW/LC could prevail over the agglomeration of GO sheets in the GO−EP MS. Pull−off adhesion tests also confirms that the presence of remaining acetone would cause the poor bonding between metal and coating in GO−EP U. This is reflected on the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results, where the GO−EP U failed to provide substantial barrier protection for carbon steel after 140 days of immersion in 3.5 wt% NaCl. Therefore, it is essential to consider the solvent effect when solvent is used in the preparation of a coating to prevent the premature failure of high−performance polymer coatings. MDPI 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9147290/ /pubmed/35629473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103445 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Othman, Nurul Husna
Mustapha, Mazli
Sallih, Nabihah
Ahmad, Azlan
Mustapha, Faizal
Ismail, Mokhtar Che
The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour
title The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour
title_full The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour
title_fullStr The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour
title_short The Effect of Residual Solvent in Carbon−Based Filler Reinforced Polymer Coating on the Curing Properties, Mechanical and Corrosive Behaviour
title_sort effect of residual solvent in carbon−based filler reinforced polymer coating on the curing properties, mechanical and corrosive behaviour
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103445
work_keys_str_mv AT othmannurulhusna theeffectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT mustaphamazli theeffectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT sallihnabihah theeffectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT ahmadazlan theeffectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT mustaphafaizal theeffectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT ismailmokhtarche theeffectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT othmannurulhusna effectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT mustaphamazli effectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT sallihnabihah effectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT ahmadazlan effectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT mustaphafaizal effectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour
AT ismailmokhtarche effectofresidualsolventincarbonbasedfillerreinforcedpolymercoatingonthecuringpropertiesmechanicalandcorrosivebehaviour