Cargando…

Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete

Numerous tests are used to determine the performance of concrete, but compressive strength (CS) is usually regarded as the most important. The recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) exhibits lower CS compared to natural aggregate concrete. Several variables, such as the water-cement ratio, the strength o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Kaffayatullah, Ahmad, Waqas, Amin, Muhammad Nasir, Aslam, Fahid, Ahmad, Ayaz, Al-Faiad, Majdi Adel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103430
_version_ 1784716794667204608
author Khan, Kaffayatullah
Ahmad, Waqas
Amin, Muhammad Nasir
Aslam, Fahid
Ahmad, Ayaz
Al-Faiad, Majdi Adel
author_facet Khan, Kaffayatullah
Ahmad, Waqas
Amin, Muhammad Nasir
Aslam, Fahid
Ahmad, Ayaz
Al-Faiad, Majdi Adel
author_sort Khan, Kaffayatullah
collection PubMed
description Numerous tests are used to determine the performance of concrete, but compressive strength (CS) is usually regarded as the most important. The recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) exhibits lower CS compared to natural aggregate concrete. Several variables, such as the water-cement ratio, the strength of the parent concrete, recycled aggregate replacement ratio, density, and water absorption of recycled aggregate, all impact the RAC’s CS. Many studies have been carried out to ascertain the influence of each of these elements separately. However, it is difficult to investigate their combined effect on the CS of RAC experimentally. Experimental investigations entail casting, curing, and testing samples, which require considerable work, expense, and time. It is vital to adopt novel methods to the stated aim in order to conduct research quickly and efficiently. The CS of RAC was predicted in this research utilizing machine learning techniques like decision tree, gradient boosting, and bagging regressor. The data set included eight input variables, and their effect on the CS of RAC was evaluated. Coefficient correlation (R(2)), the variance between predicted and experimental outcomes, statistical checks, and k-fold evaluations, were carried out to validate and compare the models. With an R(2) of 0.92, the bagging regressor technique surpassed the decision tree and gradient boosting in predicting the strength of RAC. The statistical assessments also validated the superior accuracy of the bagging regressor model, yielding lower error values like mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). MAE and RMSE values for the bagging model were 4.258 and 5.693, respectively, which were lower than the other techniques employed, i.e., gradient boosting (MAE = 4.956 and RMSE = 7.046) and decision tree (MAE = 6.389 and RMSE = 8.952). Hence, the bagging regressor is the best suitable technique to predict the CS of RAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9147385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91473852022-05-29 Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Khan, Kaffayatullah Ahmad, Waqas Amin, Muhammad Nasir Aslam, Fahid Ahmad, Ayaz Al-Faiad, Majdi Adel Materials (Basel) Article Numerous tests are used to determine the performance of concrete, but compressive strength (CS) is usually regarded as the most important. The recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) exhibits lower CS compared to natural aggregate concrete. Several variables, such as the water-cement ratio, the strength of the parent concrete, recycled aggregate replacement ratio, density, and water absorption of recycled aggregate, all impact the RAC’s CS. Many studies have been carried out to ascertain the influence of each of these elements separately. However, it is difficult to investigate their combined effect on the CS of RAC experimentally. Experimental investigations entail casting, curing, and testing samples, which require considerable work, expense, and time. It is vital to adopt novel methods to the stated aim in order to conduct research quickly and efficiently. The CS of RAC was predicted in this research utilizing machine learning techniques like decision tree, gradient boosting, and bagging regressor. The data set included eight input variables, and their effect on the CS of RAC was evaluated. Coefficient correlation (R(2)), the variance between predicted and experimental outcomes, statistical checks, and k-fold evaluations, were carried out to validate and compare the models. With an R(2) of 0.92, the bagging regressor technique surpassed the decision tree and gradient boosting in predicting the strength of RAC. The statistical assessments also validated the superior accuracy of the bagging regressor model, yielding lower error values like mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). MAE and RMSE values for the bagging model were 4.258 and 5.693, respectively, which were lower than the other techniques employed, i.e., gradient boosting (MAE = 4.956 and RMSE = 7.046) and decision tree (MAE = 6.389 and RMSE = 8.952). Hence, the bagging regressor is the best suitable technique to predict the CS of RAC. MDPI 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9147385/ /pubmed/35629456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103430 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Khan, Kaffayatullah
Ahmad, Waqas
Amin, Muhammad Nasir
Aslam, Fahid
Ahmad, Ayaz
Al-Faiad, Majdi Adel
Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete
title Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete
title_full Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete
title_fullStr Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete
title_short Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete
title_sort comparison of prediction models based on machine learning for the compressive strength estimation of recycled aggregate concrete
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15103430
work_keys_str_mv AT khankaffayatullah comparisonofpredictionmodelsbasedonmachinelearningforthecompressivestrengthestimationofrecycledaggregateconcrete
AT ahmadwaqas comparisonofpredictionmodelsbasedonmachinelearningforthecompressivestrengthestimationofrecycledaggregateconcrete
AT aminmuhammadnasir comparisonofpredictionmodelsbasedonmachinelearningforthecompressivestrengthestimationofrecycledaggregateconcrete
AT aslamfahid comparisonofpredictionmodelsbasedonmachinelearningforthecompressivestrengthestimationofrecycledaggregateconcrete
AT ahmadayaz comparisonofpredictionmodelsbasedonmachinelearningforthecompressivestrengthestimationofrecycledaggregateconcrete
AT alfaiadmajdiadel comparisonofpredictionmodelsbasedonmachinelearningforthecompressivestrengthestimationofrecycledaggregateconcrete