Cargando…
Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation
Antimicrobial resistance belongs to the most demanding medical challenges, and antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI) is considered a promising alternative to classical antibiotics. However, the pharmacologic characterization of novel compounds suitable for aPDI is a tedious and time-consumi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050950 |
_version_ | 1784716796791619584 |
---|---|
author | Lehnig, Moritz Glass, Sarah Lippmann, Norman Ziganshyna, Svitlana Eulenburg, Volker Werdehausen, Robert |
author_facet | Lehnig, Moritz Glass, Sarah Lippmann, Norman Ziganshyna, Svitlana Eulenburg, Volker Werdehausen, Robert |
author_sort | Lehnig, Moritz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial resistance belongs to the most demanding medical challenges, and antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI) is considered a promising alternative to classical antibiotics. However, the pharmacologic characterization of novel compounds suitable for aPDI is a tedious and time-consuming task that usually requires preparation of bacterial cultures and counting of bacterial colonies. In this study, we established and utilized a luminescence-based microbial cell viability assay to analyze the aPDI effects of two porphyrin-based photosensitizers (TMPyP and THPTS) on several bacterial strains with antimicrobial resistance. We demonstrate that after adaptation of the protocol and initial calibration to every specific bacterial strain and photosensitizer, the luminometric method can be used to reliably quantify aPDI effects in most of the analyzed bacterial strains. The interference of photosensitizers with the luminometric readout and the bioluminescence of some bacterial strains were identified as possible confounders. Using this method, we could confirm the susceptibility of several bacterial strains to photodynamic treatment, including extensively drug-resistant pathogens (XDR). In contrast to the conventional culture-based determination of bacterial density, the luminometric assay allowed for a much more time-effective analysis of various treatment conditions. We recommend this luminometric method for high-throughput tasks requiring measurements of bacterial viability in the context of photodynamic treatment approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9147394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91473942022-05-29 Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation Lehnig, Moritz Glass, Sarah Lippmann, Norman Ziganshyna, Svitlana Eulenburg, Volker Werdehausen, Robert Microorganisms Article Antimicrobial resistance belongs to the most demanding medical challenges, and antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI) is considered a promising alternative to classical antibiotics. However, the pharmacologic characterization of novel compounds suitable for aPDI is a tedious and time-consuming task that usually requires preparation of bacterial cultures and counting of bacterial colonies. In this study, we established and utilized a luminescence-based microbial cell viability assay to analyze the aPDI effects of two porphyrin-based photosensitizers (TMPyP and THPTS) on several bacterial strains with antimicrobial resistance. We demonstrate that after adaptation of the protocol and initial calibration to every specific bacterial strain and photosensitizer, the luminometric method can be used to reliably quantify aPDI effects in most of the analyzed bacterial strains. The interference of photosensitizers with the luminometric readout and the bioluminescence of some bacterial strains were identified as possible confounders. Using this method, we could confirm the susceptibility of several bacterial strains to photodynamic treatment, including extensively drug-resistant pathogens (XDR). In contrast to the conventional culture-based determination of bacterial density, the luminometric assay allowed for a much more time-effective analysis of various treatment conditions. We recommend this luminometric method for high-throughput tasks requiring measurements of bacterial viability in the context of photodynamic treatment approaches. MDPI 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9147394/ /pubmed/35630394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050950 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lehnig, Moritz Glass, Sarah Lippmann, Norman Ziganshyna, Svitlana Eulenburg, Volker Werdehausen, Robert Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation |
title | Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation |
title_full | Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation |
title_short | Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation |
title_sort | evaluation of a luminometric cell counting system in context of antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050950 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lehnigmoritz evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation AT glasssarah evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation AT lippmannnorman evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation AT ziganshynasvitlana evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation AT eulenburgvolker evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation AT werdehausenrobert evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation |