Cargando…

Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation

Antimicrobial resistance belongs to the most demanding medical challenges, and antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI) is considered a promising alternative to classical antibiotics. However, the pharmacologic characterization of novel compounds suitable for aPDI is a tedious and time-consumi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehnig, Moritz, Glass, Sarah, Lippmann, Norman, Ziganshyna, Svitlana, Eulenburg, Volker, Werdehausen, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050950
_version_ 1784716796791619584
author Lehnig, Moritz
Glass, Sarah
Lippmann, Norman
Ziganshyna, Svitlana
Eulenburg, Volker
Werdehausen, Robert
author_facet Lehnig, Moritz
Glass, Sarah
Lippmann, Norman
Ziganshyna, Svitlana
Eulenburg, Volker
Werdehausen, Robert
author_sort Lehnig, Moritz
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial resistance belongs to the most demanding medical challenges, and antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI) is considered a promising alternative to classical antibiotics. However, the pharmacologic characterization of novel compounds suitable for aPDI is a tedious and time-consuming task that usually requires preparation of bacterial cultures and counting of bacterial colonies. In this study, we established and utilized a luminescence-based microbial cell viability assay to analyze the aPDI effects of two porphyrin-based photosensitizers (TMPyP and THPTS) on several bacterial strains with antimicrobial resistance. We demonstrate that after adaptation of the protocol and initial calibration to every specific bacterial strain and photosensitizer, the luminometric method can be used to reliably quantify aPDI effects in most of the analyzed bacterial strains. The interference of photosensitizers with the luminometric readout and the bioluminescence of some bacterial strains were identified as possible confounders. Using this method, we could confirm the susceptibility of several bacterial strains to photodynamic treatment, including extensively drug-resistant pathogens (XDR). In contrast to the conventional culture-based determination of bacterial density, the luminometric assay allowed for a much more time-effective analysis of various treatment conditions. We recommend this luminometric method for high-throughput tasks requiring measurements of bacterial viability in the context of photodynamic treatment approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9147394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91473942022-05-29 Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation Lehnig, Moritz Glass, Sarah Lippmann, Norman Ziganshyna, Svitlana Eulenburg, Volker Werdehausen, Robert Microorganisms Article Antimicrobial resistance belongs to the most demanding medical challenges, and antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI) is considered a promising alternative to classical antibiotics. However, the pharmacologic characterization of novel compounds suitable for aPDI is a tedious and time-consuming task that usually requires preparation of bacterial cultures and counting of bacterial colonies. In this study, we established and utilized a luminescence-based microbial cell viability assay to analyze the aPDI effects of two porphyrin-based photosensitizers (TMPyP and THPTS) on several bacterial strains with antimicrobial resistance. We demonstrate that after adaptation of the protocol and initial calibration to every specific bacterial strain and photosensitizer, the luminometric method can be used to reliably quantify aPDI effects in most of the analyzed bacterial strains. The interference of photosensitizers with the luminometric readout and the bioluminescence of some bacterial strains were identified as possible confounders. Using this method, we could confirm the susceptibility of several bacterial strains to photodynamic treatment, including extensively drug-resistant pathogens (XDR). In contrast to the conventional culture-based determination of bacterial density, the luminometric assay allowed for a much more time-effective analysis of various treatment conditions. We recommend this luminometric method for high-throughput tasks requiring measurements of bacterial viability in the context of photodynamic treatment approaches. MDPI 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9147394/ /pubmed/35630394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050950 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lehnig, Moritz
Glass, Sarah
Lippmann, Norman
Ziganshyna, Svitlana
Eulenburg, Volker
Werdehausen, Robert
Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation
title Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation
title_full Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation
title_short Evaluation of a Luminometric Cell Counting System in Context of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation
title_sort evaluation of a luminometric cell counting system in context of antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050950
work_keys_str_mv AT lehnigmoritz evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation
AT glasssarah evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation
AT lippmannnorman evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation
AT ziganshynasvitlana evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation
AT eulenburgvolker evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation
AT werdehausenrobert evaluationofaluminometriccellcountingsystemincontextofantimicrobialphotodynamicinactivation