Cargando…

Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review

Nowadays, wearables are a must-have tool for athletes and coaches. Wearables can provide real-time feedback to athletes on their athletic performance and other training details as training load, for example. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that assessed the accuracy of wea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morais, Jorge E., Oliveira, João P., Sampaio, Tatiana, Barbosa, Tiago M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632086
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22103677
_version_ 1784716876643827712
author Morais, Jorge E.
Oliveira, João P.
Sampaio, Tatiana
Barbosa, Tiago M.
author_facet Morais, Jorge E.
Oliveira, João P.
Sampaio, Tatiana
Barbosa, Tiago M.
author_sort Morais, Jorge E.
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, wearables are a must-have tool for athletes and coaches. Wearables can provide real-time feedback to athletes on their athletic performance and other training details as training load, for example. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that assessed the accuracy of wearables providing real-time feedback in swimming. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were selected to identify relevant studies. After screening, 283 articles were analyzed and 18 related to the assessment of the accuracy of wearables providing real-time feedback in swimming were retained for qualitative synthesis. The quality index was 12.44 ± 2.71 in a range from 0 (lowest quality) to 16 (highest quality). Most articles assessed in-house built (n = 15; 83.3%) wearables in front-crawl stroke (n = 8; 44.4%), eleven articles (61.1%) analyzed the accuracy of measuring swimming kinematics, eight (44.4%) were placed on the lower back, and seven were placed on the head (38.9%). A limited number of studies analyzed wearables that are commercially available (n = 3, 16.7%). Eleven articles (61.1%) reported on the accuracy, measurement error, or consistency. From those eleven, nine (81.8%) noted that wearables are accurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9147718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91477182022-05-29 Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review Morais, Jorge E. Oliveira, João P. Sampaio, Tatiana Barbosa, Tiago M. Sensors (Basel) Review Nowadays, wearables are a must-have tool for athletes and coaches. Wearables can provide real-time feedback to athletes on their athletic performance and other training details as training load, for example. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that assessed the accuracy of wearables providing real-time feedback in swimming. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were selected to identify relevant studies. After screening, 283 articles were analyzed and 18 related to the assessment of the accuracy of wearables providing real-time feedback in swimming were retained for qualitative synthesis. The quality index was 12.44 ± 2.71 in a range from 0 (lowest quality) to 16 (highest quality). Most articles assessed in-house built (n = 15; 83.3%) wearables in front-crawl stroke (n = 8; 44.4%), eleven articles (61.1%) analyzed the accuracy of measuring swimming kinematics, eight (44.4%) were placed on the lower back, and seven were placed on the head (38.9%). A limited number of studies analyzed wearables that are commercially available (n = 3, 16.7%). Eleven articles (61.1%) reported on the accuracy, measurement error, or consistency. From those eleven, nine (81.8%) noted that wearables are accurate. MDPI 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9147718/ /pubmed/35632086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22103677 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Morais, Jorge E.
Oliveira, João P.
Sampaio, Tatiana
Barbosa, Tiago M.
Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review
title Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review
title_full Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review
title_short Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review
title_sort wearables in swimming for real-time feedback: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632086
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22103677
work_keys_str_mv AT moraisjorgee wearablesinswimmingforrealtimefeedbackasystematicreview
AT oliveirajoaop wearablesinswimmingforrealtimefeedbackasystematicreview
AT sampaiotatiana wearablesinswimmingforrealtimefeedbackasystematicreview
AT barbosatiagom wearablesinswimmingforrealtimefeedbackasystematicreview