Cargando…
An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry
Sex determination in forensic dentistry is a major step towards postmortem profiling. The most widely recognized method is DNA, yet its application in the dental field of forensic sciences is still impractical. Depending on the conditions of the remains, teeth are often the only surviving organ. Som...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050787 |
_version_ | 1784716918514515968 |
---|---|
author | Albernaz Neves, João Antunes-Ferreira, Nathalie Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Quintas, Alexandre Sintra Delgado, Ana Mendes, José João |
author_facet | Albernaz Neves, João Antunes-Ferreira, Nathalie Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Quintas, Alexandre Sintra Delgado, Ana Mendes, José João |
author_sort | Albernaz Neves, João |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sex determination in forensic dentistry is a major step towards postmortem profiling. The most widely recognized method is DNA, yet its application in the dental field of forensic sciences is still impractical. Depending on the conditions of the remains, teeth are often the only surviving organ. Some systematic reviews (SRs) have been recently produced; hence this umbrella review critically assesses their level of evidence and provides an overall comprehensive view. An electronic database search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and LILACS) and three grey search engines up to December 2021, focusing on SRs of sex determination through forensic dentistry procedures. The methodological quality of the SRs was analyzed using the measurement tool to assess SRs criteria (AMSTAR2). Five SRs were included, two of critically low quality and three of low quality. The SRs posited that canines are the most dimorphic teeth; oral tissue remnants are a rich source for sex determination by DNA tracing; and artificial intelligence tools demonstrate high potential in forensic dentistry. The quality of evidence on sex determination using dental approaches was rated as low. Well-designed clinical trials and high standard systematic reviews are essential to corroborate the accuracy of the different procedures of sex determination in forensic dentistry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9147890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91478902022-05-29 An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry Albernaz Neves, João Antunes-Ferreira, Nathalie Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Quintas, Alexandre Sintra Delgado, Ana Mendes, José João J Pers Med Review Sex determination in forensic dentistry is a major step towards postmortem profiling. The most widely recognized method is DNA, yet its application in the dental field of forensic sciences is still impractical. Depending on the conditions of the remains, teeth are often the only surviving organ. Some systematic reviews (SRs) have been recently produced; hence this umbrella review critically assesses their level of evidence and provides an overall comprehensive view. An electronic database search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and LILACS) and three grey search engines up to December 2021, focusing on SRs of sex determination through forensic dentistry procedures. The methodological quality of the SRs was analyzed using the measurement tool to assess SRs criteria (AMSTAR2). Five SRs were included, two of critically low quality and three of low quality. The SRs posited that canines are the most dimorphic teeth; oral tissue remnants are a rich source for sex determination by DNA tracing; and artificial intelligence tools demonstrate high potential in forensic dentistry. The quality of evidence on sex determination using dental approaches was rated as low. Well-designed clinical trials and high standard systematic reviews are essential to corroborate the accuracy of the different procedures of sex determination in forensic dentistry. MDPI 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9147890/ /pubmed/35629209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050787 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Albernaz Neves, João Antunes-Ferreira, Nathalie Machado, Vanessa Botelho, João Proença, Luís Quintas, Alexandre Sintra Delgado, Ana Mendes, José João An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry |
title | An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry |
title_full | An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry |
title_fullStr | An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry |
title_full_unstemmed | An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry |
title_short | An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry |
title_sort | umbrella review of the evidence of sex determination procedures in forensic dentistry |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9147890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35629209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050787 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albernaznevesjoao anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT antunesferreiranathalie anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT machadovanessa anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT botelhojoao anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT proencaluis anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT quintasalexandre anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT sintradelgadoana anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT mendesjosejoao anumbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT albernaznevesjoao umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT antunesferreiranathalie umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT machadovanessa umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT botelhojoao umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT proencaluis umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT quintasalexandre umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT sintradelgadoana umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry AT mendesjosejoao umbrellareviewoftheevidenceofsexdeterminationproceduresinforensicdentistry |