Cargando…

A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective

Scholars have been suffering from scams involving counterfeit academic journals for a long time, and there has been a relatively clear analysis of the causes of counterfeiting and the governance path for it in existing studies. However, the authors reexamined the counterfeiting and found the problem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Ai, Qian, Chuhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3054668
_version_ 1784717007543861248
author Lei, Ai
Qian, Chuhan
author_facet Lei, Ai
Qian, Chuhan
author_sort Lei, Ai
collection PubMed
description Scholars have been suffering from scams involving counterfeit academic journals for a long time, and there has been a relatively clear analysis of the causes of counterfeiting and the governance path for it in existing studies. However, the authors reexamined the counterfeiting and found the problem still prevails. Through the analysis of the multiple players involved in counterfeiting, the author points out that the current personnel evaluation mechanism and journal evaluation system are the root causes of counterfeiting and thus offer corresponding suggestions for further improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9148261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91482612022-05-29 A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective Lei, Ai Qian, Chuhan Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Scholars have been suffering from scams involving counterfeit academic journals for a long time, and there has been a relatively clear analysis of the causes of counterfeiting and the governance path for it in existing studies. However, the authors reexamined the counterfeiting and found the problem still prevails. Through the analysis of the multiple players involved in counterfeiting, the author points out that the current personnel evaluation mechanism and journal evaluation system are the root causes of counterfeiting and thus offer corresponding suggestions for further improvement. Hindawi 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9148261/ /pubmed/35637725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3054668 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ai Lei and Chuhan Qian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lei, Ai
Qian, Chuhan
A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective
title A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective
title_full A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective
title_fullStr A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective
title_full_unstemmed A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective
title_short A Probe into the Counterfeiting of Academic Journals from Multiple Player Perspective
title_sort probe into the counterfeiting of academic journals from multiple player perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3054668
work_keys_str_mv AT leiai aprobeintothecounterfeitingofacademicjournalsfrommultipleplayerperspective
AT qianchuhan aprobeintothecounterfeitingofacademicjournalsfrommultipleplayerperspective
AT leiai probeintothecounterfeitingofacademicjournalsfrommultipleplayerperspective
AT qianchuhan probeintothecounterfeitingofacademicjournalsfrommultipleplayerperspective