Cargando…

Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?

Although the administration of fluid is the first treatment considered in almost all cases of circulatory failure, this therapeutic option poses two essential problems: the increase in cardiac output induced by a bolus of fluid is inconstant, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload are now cle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monnet, Xavier, Shi, Rui, Teboul, Jean-Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8
_version_ 1784717020271476736
author Monnet, Xavier
Shi, Rui
Teboul, Jean-Louis
author_facet Monnet, Xavier
Shi, Rui
Teboul, Jean-Louis
author_sort Monnet, Xavier
collection PubMed
description Although the administration of fluid is the first treatment considered in almost all cases of circulatory failure, this therapeutic option poses two essential problems: the increase in cardiac output induced by a bolus of fluid is inconstant, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload are now clearly demonstrated. This is why many tests and indices have been developed to detect preload dependence and predict fluid responsiveness. In this review, we take stock of the data published in the field over the past three years. Regarding the passive leg raising test, we detail the different stroke volume surrogates that have recently been described to measure its effects using minimally invasive and easily accessible methods. We review the limits of the test, especially in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Regarding the end-expiratory occlusion test, we also present recent investigations that have sought to measure its effects without an invasive measurement of cardiac output. Although the limits of interpretation of the respiratory variation of pulse pressure and of the diameter of the vena cava during mechanical ventilation are now well known, several recent studies have shown how changes in pulse pressure variation itself during other tests reflect simultaneous changes in cardiac output, allowing these tests to be carried out without its direct measurement. This is particularly the case during the tidal volume challenge, a relatively recent test whose reliability is increasingly well established. The mini-fluid challenge has the advantage of being easy to perform, but it requires direct measurement of cardiac output, like the classic fluid challenge. Initially described with echocardiography, recent studies have investigated other means of judging its effects. We highlight the problem of their precision, which is necessary to evidence small changes in cardiac output. Finally, we point out other tests that have appeared more recently, such as the Trendelenburg manoeuvre, a potentially interesting alternative for patients in the prone position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9148319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91483192022-05-30 Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new? Monnet, Xavier Shi, Rui Teboul, Jean-Louis Ann Intensive Care Review Although the administration of fluid is the first treatment considered in almost all cases of circulatory failure, this therapeutic option poses two essential problems: the increase in cardiac output induced by a bolus of fluid is inconstant, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload are now clearly demonstrated. This is why many tests and indices have been developed to detect preload dependence and predict fluid responsiveness. In this review, we take stock of the data published in the field over the past three years. Regarding the passive leg raising test, we detail the different stroke volume surrogates that have recently been described to measure its effects using minimally invasive and easily accessible methods. We review the limits of the test, especially in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Regarding the end-expiratory occlusion test, we also present recent investigations that have sought to measure its effects without an invasive measurement of cardiac output. Although the limits of interpretation of the respiratory variation of pulse pressure and of the diameter of the vena cava during mechanical ventilation are now well known, several recent studies have shown how changes in pulse pressure variation itself during other tests reflect simultaneous changes in cardiac output, allowing these tests to be carried out without its direct measurement. This is particularly the case during the tidal volume challenge, a relatively recent test whose reliability is increasingly well established. The mini-fluid challenge has the advantage of being easy to perform, but it requires direct measurement of cardiac output, like the classic fluid challenge. Initially described with echocardiography, recent studies have investigated other means of judging its effects. We highlight the problem of their precision, which is necessary to evidence small changes in cardiac output. Finally, we point out other tests that have appeared more recently, such as the Trendelenburg manoeuvre, a potentially interesting alternative for patients in the prone position. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9148319/ /pubmed/35633423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Monnet, Xavier
Shi, Rui
Teboul, Jean-Louis
Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?
title Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?
title_full Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?
title_fullStr Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?
title_short Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?
title_sort prediction of fluid responsiveness. what’s new?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8
work_keys_str_mv AT monnetxavier predictionoffluidresponsivenesswhatsnew
AT shirui predictionoffluidresponsivenesswhatsnew
AT tebouljeanlouis predictionoffluidresponsivenesswhatsnew