Cargando…
A convolutional neural network for total tumor segmentation in [(64)Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms
BACKGROUND: Segmentation of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in [(64)Cu]Cu-DOTATATE positron emission tomography makes it possible to extract quantitative measures useable for prognostication of patients. However, manual tumor segmentation is cumbersome and time-consuming. Therefore, we aimed to impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00901-2 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Segmentation of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in [(64)Cu]Cu-DOTATATE positron emission tomography makes it possible to extract quantitative measures useable for prognostication of patients. However, manual tumor segmentation is cumbersome and time-consuming. Therefore, we aimed to implement and test an artificial intelligence (AI) network for tumor segmentation. Patients with gastroenteropancreatic or lung NEN with [(64)Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT performed were included in our training (n = 117) and test cohort (n = 41). Further, 10 patients with no signs of NEN were included as negative controls. Ground truth segmentations were obtained by a standardized semiautomatic method for tumor segmentation by a physician. The nnU-Net framework was used to set up a deep learning U-net architecture. Dice score, sensitivity and precision were used for selection of the final model. AI segmentations were implemented in a clinical imaging viewer where a physician evaluated performance and performed manual adjustments. RESULTS: Cross-validation training was used to generate models and an ensemble model. The ensemble model performed best overall with a lesion-wise dice of 0.850 and pixel-wise dice, precision and sensitivity of 0.801, 0.786 and 0.872, respectively. Performance of the ensemble model was acceptable with some degree of manual adjustment in 35/41 (85%) patients. Final tumor segmentation could be obtained from the AI model with manual adjustments in 5 min versus 17 min for ground truth method, p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: We implemented and validated an AI model that achieved a high similarity with ground truth segmentation and resulted in faster tumor segmentation. With AI, total tumor segmentation may become feasible in the clinical routine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-022-00901-2. |
---|