Cargando…

Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has developed into a worldwide pandemic, which presents several challenges for frontline health-care workers (HCWs). HCWs are highly prone to various skin diseases due to prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The most frequently used ty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ning, Ye, Min, Zhu, Qinya, Chen, Dingchao, Xu, Mingmin, He, Jia, Li, Qian, Li, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642175
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S365390
_version_ 1784717063840858112
author Liu, Ning
Ye, Min
Zhu, Qinya
Chen, Dingchao
Xu, Mingmin
He, Jia
Li, Qian
Li, Jie
author_facet Liu, Ning
Ye, Min
Zhu, Qinya
Chen, Dingchao
Xu, Mingmin
He, Jia
Li, Qian
Li, Jie
author_sort Liu, Ning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has developed into a worldwide pandemic, which presents several challenges for frontline health-care workers (HCWs). HCWs are highly prone to various skin diseases due to prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The most frequently used type of PPE is facemasks. To effectively control adverse skin reactions, there is an urgent need for a range of preventive practices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Zhejiang province, China. HCWs were invited to participate in the web survey. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a predesigned data collection form and analyzed with SPSS 20.0. RESULTS: A total of 1147 questionnaires were collected, and of these, 1090 (95.03%) were valid and returned. The incidence of chest tightness and shortness of breath and face eczema was significantly higher in HCWs wearing N95 facemasks (41.91%; 31.62%) than in the HCWs wearing medical facemasks (38.05%, P = 0.010; 21.91%, P = 0.012). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing hang-facemasks (83.81%) than in HCWs wearing strains-facemasks (61.19%, P < 0.001). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing undiscriminating size code facemasks (79.88%) than in the HCWs wearing discriminating size code facemasks (67.86%, P = 0.031). There was a significant reduction (P  <  0.001) in the incidence of HCWs without adverse reactions (ADRs) with increasing time wearing facemasks. CONCLUSION: Incidence of ADRs does not significantly increase with the durations of mask wear where wearing mask time exceeded 4 hours per day. The medical staff generally wore masks for more than 4 hours per day; therefore, we recommend taking 15 min of rest after 2 hours of mask-wearing. Results in this study support the conclusion that the type of strain-facemasks and discriminating size code facemasks has a lower incidence of ADRs than other type of medical facemasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9148581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91485812022-05-30 Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey Liu, Ning Ye, Min Zhu, Qinya Chen, Dingchao Xu, Mingmin He, Jia Li, Qian Li, Jie Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has developed into a worldwide pandemic, which presents several challenges for frontline health-care workers (HCWs). HCWs are highly prone to various skin diseases due to prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The most frequently used type of PPE is facemasks. To effectively control adverse skin reactions, there is an urgent need for a range of preventive practices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Zhejiang province, China. HCWs were invited to participate in the web survey. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a predesigned data collection form and analyzed with SPSS 20.0. RESULTS: A total of 1147 questionnaires were collected, and of these, 1090 (95.03%) were valid and returned. The incidence of chest tightness and shortness of breath and face eczema was significantly higher in HCWs wearing N95 facemasks (41.91%; 31.62%) than in the HCWs wearing medical facemasks (38.05%, P = 0.010; 21.91%, P = 0.012). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing hang-facemasks (83.81%) than in HCWs wearing strains-facemasks (61.19%, P < 0.001). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing undiscriminating size code facemasks (79.88%) than in the HCWs wearing discriminating size code facemasks (67.86%, P = 0.031). There was a significant reduction (P  <  0.001) in the incidence of HCWs without adverse reactions (ADRs) with increasing time wearing facemasks. CONCLUSION: Incidence of ADRs does not significantly increase with the durations of mask wear where wearing mask time exceeded 4 hours per day. The medical staff generally wore masks for more than 4 hours per day; therefore, we recommend taking 15 min of rest after 2 hours of mask-wearing. Results in this study support the conclusion that the type of strain-facemasks and discriminating size code facemasks has a lower incidence of ADRs than other type of medical facemasks. Dove 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9148581/ /pubmed/35642175 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S365390 Text en © 2022 Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Liu, Ning
Ye, Min
Zhu, Qinya
Chen, Dingchao
Xu, Mingmin
He, Jia
Li, Qian
Li, Jie
Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_fullStr Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full_unstemmed Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_short Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_sort adverse reactions to facemasks in health-care workers: a cross-sectional survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642175
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S365390
work_keys_str_mv AT liuning adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey
AT yemin adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey
AT zhuqinya adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey
AT chendingchao adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey
AT xumingmin adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey
AT hejia adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey
AT liqian adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey
AT lijie adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey