Cargando…
Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has developed into a worldwide pandemic, which presents several challenges for frontline health-care workers (HCWs). HCWs are highly prone to various skin diseases due to prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The most frequently used ty...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642175 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S365390 |
_version_ | 1784717063840858112 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Ning Ye, Min Zhu, Qinya Chen, Dingchao Xu, Mingmin He, Jia Li, Qian Li, Jie |
author_facet | Liu, Ning Ye, Min Zhu, Qinya Chen, Dingchao Xu, Mingmin He, Jia Li, Qian Li, Jie |
author_sort | Liu, Ning |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has developed into a worldwide pandemic, which presents several challenges for frontline health-care workers (HCWs). HCWs are highly prone to various skin diseases due to prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The most frequently used type of PPE is facemasks. To effectively control adverse skin reactions, there is an urgent need for a range of preventive practices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Zhejiang province, China. HCWs were invited to participate in the web survey. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a predesigned data collection form and analyzed with SPSS 20.0. RESULTS: A total of 1147 questionnaires were collected, and of these, 1090 (95.03%) were valid and returned. The incidence of chest tightness and shortness of breath and face eczema was significantly higher in HCWs wearing N95 facemasks (41.91%; 31.62%) than in the HCWs wearing medical facemasks (38.05%, P = 0.010; 21.91%, P = 0.012). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing hang-facemasks (83.81%) than in HCWs wearing strains-facemasks (61.19%, P < 0.001). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing undiscriminating size code facemasks (79.88%) than in the HCWs wearing discriminating size code facemasks (67.86%, P = 0.031). There was a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the incidence of HCWs without adverse reactions (ADRs) with increasing time wearing facemasks. CONCLUSION: Incidence of ADRs does not significantly increase with the durations of mask wear where wearing mask time exceeded 4 hours per day. The medical staff generally wore masks for more than 4 hours per day; therefore, we recommend taking 15 min of rest after 2 hours of mask-wearing. Results in this study support the conclusion that the type of strain-facemasks and discriminating size code facemasks has a lower incidence of ADRs than other type of medical facemasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9148581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91485812022-05-30 Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey Liu, Ning Ye, Min Zhu, Qinya Chen, Dingchao Xu, Mingmin He, Jia Li, Qian Li, Jie Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has developed into a worldwide pandemic, which presents several challenges for frontline health-care workers (HCWs). HCWs are highly prone to various skin diseases due to prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The most frequently used type of PPE is facemasks. To effectively control adverse skin reactions, there is an urgent need for a range of preventive practices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Zhejiang province, China. HCWs were invited to participate in the web survey. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a predesigned data collection form and analyzed with SPSS 20.0. RESULTS: A total of 1147 questionnaires were collected, and of these, 1090 (95.03%) were valid and returned. The incidence of chest tightness and shortness of breath and face eczema was significantly higher in HCWs wearing N95 facemasks (41.91%; 31.62%) than in the HCWs wearing medical facemasks (38.05%, P = 0.010; 21.91%, P = 0.012). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing hang-facemasks (83.81%) than in HCWs wearing strains-facemasks (61.19%, P < 0.001). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing undiscriminating size code facemasks (79.88%) than in the HCWs wearing discriminating size code facemasks (67.86%, P = 0.031). There was a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the incidence of HCWs without adverse reactions (ADRs) with increasing time wearing facemasks. CONCLUSION: Incidence of ADRs does not significantly increase with the durations of mask wear where wearing mask time exceeded 4 hours per day. The medical staff generally wore masks for more than 4 hours per day; therefore, we recommend taking 15 min of rest after 2 hours of mask-wearing. Results in this study support the conclusion that the type of strain-facemasks and discriminating size code facemasks has a lower incidence of ADRs than other type of medical facemasks. Dove 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9148581/ /pubmed/35642175 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S365390 Text en © 2022 Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Liu, Ning Ye, Min Zhu, Qinya Chen, Dingchao Xu, Mingmin He, Jia Li, Qian Li, Jie Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title | Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full | Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_fullStr | Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_short | Adverse Reactions to Facemasks in Health-Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_sort | adverse reactions to facemasks in health-care workers: a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642175 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S365390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuning adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey AT yemin adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey AT zhuqinya adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey AT chendingchao adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey AT xumingmin adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey AT hejia adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey AT liqian adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey AT lijie adversereactionstofacemasksinhealthcareworkersacrosssectionalsurvey |