Cargando…

Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience

The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs; also called biosimilars) were adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. In 2019, the ECBS considered that a more tailored and potentially reduced clinical da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurki, Pekka, Kang, Hye-Na, Ekman, Niklas, Knezevic, Ivana, Weise, Martina, Wolff-Holz, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-022-00533-x
_version_ 1784717099894046720
author Kurki, Pekka
Kang, Hye-Na
Ekman, Niklas
Knezevic, Ivana
Weise, Martina
Wolff-Holz, Elena
author_facet Kurki, Pekka
Kang, Hye-Na
Ekman, Niklas
Knezevic, Ivana
Weise, Martina
Wolff-Holz, Elena
author_sort Kurki, Pekka
collection PubMed
description The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs; also called biosimilars) were adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. In 2019, the ECBS considered that a more tailored and potentially reduced clinical data package may be acceptable in cases where this was clearly supported by the available scientific evidence. The goal of this publication is to review the current clinical experience and scientific evidence and to provide an expert perspective for updating the WHO guidelines to provide more flexibility and clarity. As the first step, the relevant guidelines by other regulatory bodies were reviewed in order to identify issues that might help with updating the WHO guidelines. Next, a literature search was conducted for information on the long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars to identify possible long-term problems. Finally, a search for articles concerning the role of clinical studies in the benefit–risk evaluation of biosimilars was conducted. The analysis of other guidelines suggested that the WHO guidelines may need more emphasis on the importance of the state-of-the-art physicochemical and structural comparability exercise and in vitro functional testing. The use of “foreign” reference product will also need clarifications. The value of in vivo toxicological tests in the development of biosimilars is questionable, and the non-clinical part needs revisions accordingly. The concepts of “totality of evidence,” “stepwise development,” and “residual uncertainty” were applied in the evaluation of the clinical sections of the guideline. The review of long-term safety and efficacy demonstrated the robustness of the current biosimilar development concept. The analysis of the roles of different development phases suggested that the large efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity studies are, in most cases, redundant. The residual uncertainty of safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of biosimilars that has shaped the current regulatory guidelines is now substantially reduced. This will allow the re-evaluation of the non-clinical and clinical requirements of the current WHO main guideline. The shift of the relative impact of the development phases towards physico-chemical and in vitro functional testing will provide a relief to the manufacturers and new challenges to the regulators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9148871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91488712022-05-31 Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience Kurki, Pekka Kang, Hye-Na Ekman, Niklas Knezevic, Ivana Weise, Martina Wolff-Holz, Elena BioDrugs Review Article The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs; also called biosimilars) were adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. In 2019, the ECBS considered that a more tailored and potentially reduced clinical data package may be acceptable in cases where this was clearly supported by the available scientific evidence. The goal of this publication is to review the current clinical experience and scientific evidence and to provide an expert perspective for updating the WHO guidelines to provide more flexibility and clarity. As the first step, the relevant guidelines by other regulatory bodies were reviewed in order to identify issues that might help with updating the WHO guidelines. Next, a literature search was conducted for information on the long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars to identify possible long-term problems. Finally, a search for articles concerning the role of clinical studies in the benefit–risk evaluation of biosimilars was conducted. The analysis of other guidelines suggested that the WHO guidelines may need more emphasis on the importance of the state-of-the-art physicochemical and structural comparability exercise and in vitro functional testing. The use of “foreign” reference product will also need clarifications. The value of in vivo toxicological tests in the development of biosimilars is questionable, and the non-clinical part needs revisions accordingly. The concepts of “totality of evidence,” “stepwise development,” and “residual uncertainty” were applied in the evaluation of the clinical sections of the guideline. The review of long-term safety and efficacy demonstrated the robustness of the current biosimilar development concept. The analysis of the roles of different development phases suggested that the large efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity studies are, in most cases, redundant. The residual uncertainty of safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of biosimilars that has shaped the current regulatory guidelines is now substantially reduced. This will allow the re-evaluation of the non-clinical and clinical requirements of the current WHO main guideline. The shift of the relative impact of the development phases towards physico-chemical and in vitro functional testing will provide a relief to the manufacturers and new challenges to the regulators. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9148871/ /pubmed/35596890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-022-00533-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Kurki, Pekka
Kang, Hye-Na
Ekman, Niklas
Knezevic, Ivana
Weise, Martina
Wolff-Holz, Elena
Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience
title Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience
title_full Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience
title_fullStr Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience
title_short Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience
title_sort regulatory evaluation of biosimilars: refinement of principles based on the scientific evidence and clinical experience
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-022-00533-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kurkipekka regulatoryevaluationofbiosimilarsrefinementofprinciplesbasedonthescientificevidenceandclinicalexperience
AT kanghyena regulatoryevaluationofbiosimilarsrefinementofprinciplesbasedonthescientificevidenceandclinicalexperience
AT ekmanniklas regulatoryevaluationofbiosimilarsrefinementofprinciplesbasedonthescientificevidenceandclinicalexperience
AT knezevicivana regulatoryevaluationofbiosimilarsrefinementofprinciplesbasedonthescientificevidenceandclinicalexperience
AT weisemartina regulatoryevaluationofbiosimilarsrefinementofprinciplesbasedonthescientificevidenceandclinicalexperience
AT wolffholzelena regulatoryevaluationofbiosimilarsrefinementofprinciplesbasedonthescientificevidenceandclinicalexperience