Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: The outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in more than 200 million infections and 4 million deaths. The blood derivative therapy represented by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and convalescent plasma (CP) therapy may be the promising therapeutics for COVID-19. METHODS: A systematic article...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000524125 |
_version_ | 1784717104137633792 |
---|---|
author | Fei, Zhangcheng Chen, Zhongsheng Du, Xi Cao, Haijun Li, Changqing |
author_facet | Fei, Zhangcheng Chen, Zhongsheng Du, Xi Cao, Haijun Li, Changqing |
author_sort | Fei, Zhangcheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in more than 200 million infections and 4 million deaths. The blood derivative therapy represented by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and convalescent plasma (CP) therapy may be the promising therapeutics for COVID-19. METHODS: A systematic article search was performed for eligible studies published up to August 3, 2021, through the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library. The included articles were screened by using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 5 IVIG therapy and 13 CP therapy randomized controlled trials were included with a sample size of 13,696 subjects diagnosed with COVID-19. IVIG could reduce the mortality compared with the control group (RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46–0.93, p = 0.02). The use of CP did not effectively reduce the mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91–1.03, p = 0.38), the length of hospital stay (MD −0.47, 95% CI: −4.13 to 3.20, p = 0.80), and the mechanical ventilation use (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89–1.07, p = 0.62) of the patients with COVID-19. Treatment with IVIG or CP was not significantly associated with an increase in reported adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94–1.22, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IVIG could be effective and safe to improve survival for patients with COVID-19. But the benefit of CP in the treatment of COVID-19 is limited. The certainty of the evidence was moderate for all outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9148901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91489012022-05-31 Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Fei, Zhangcheng Chen, Zhongsheng Du, Xi Cao, Haijun Li, Changqing Transfus Med Hemother Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in more than 200 million infections and 4 million deaths. The blood derivative therapy represented by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and convalescent plasma (CP) therapy may be the promising therapeutics for COVID-19. METHODS: A systematic article search was performed for eligible studies published up to August 3, 2021, through the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library. The included articles were screened by using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 5 IVIG therapy and 13 CP therapy randomized controlled trials were included with a sample size of 13,696 subjects diagnosed with COVID-19. IVIG could reduce the mortality compared with the control group (RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46–0.93, p = 0.02). The use of CP did not effectively reduce the mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91–1.03, p = 0.38), the length of hospital stay (MD −0.47, 95% CI: −4.13 to 3.20, p = 0.80), and the mechanical ventilation use (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89–1.07, p = 0.62) of the patients with COVID-19. Treatment with IVIG or CP was not significantly associated with an increase in reported adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94–1.22, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IVIG could be effective and safe to improve survival for patients with COVID-19. But the benefit of CP in the treatment of COVID-19 is limited. The certainty of the evidence was moderate for all outcomes. S. Karger AG 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9148901/ /pubmed/35665313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000524125 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Fei, Zhangcheng Chen, Zhongsheng Du, Xi Cao, Haijun Li, Changqing Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Blood Derivative Therapy for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of blood derivative therapy for patients with covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000524125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feizhangcheng efficacyandsafetyofbloodderivativetherapyforpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenzhongsheng efficacyandsafetyofbloodderivativetherapyforpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duxi efficacyandsafetyofbloodderivativetherapyforpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caohaijun efficacyandsafetyofbloodderivativetherapyforpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lichangqing efficacyandsafetyofbloodderivativetherapyforpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |