Cargando…
Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update
Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a frequent repercussion of a cerebrovascular accident, typically a stroke. USN patients fail to orient their attention to the contralesional side to detect auditory, visual, and somatosensory stimuli, as well as to collect and purposely use this information. Tradi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00648-0 |
_version_ | 1784717112667799552 |
---|---|
author | Cavedoni, S. Cipresso, P. Mancuso, V. Bruni, F. Pedroli, E. |
author_facet | Cavedoni, S. Cipresso, P. Mancuso, V. Bruni, F. Pedroli, E. |
author_sort | Cavedoni, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a frequent repercussion of a cerebrovascular accident, typically a stroke. USN patients fail to orient their attention to the contralesional side to detect auditory, visual, and somatosensory stimuli, as well as to collect and purposely use this information. Traditional methods for USN assessment and rehabilitation include paper-and-pencil procedures, which address cognitive functions as isolated from other aspects of patients’ functioning within a real-life context. This might compromise the ecological validity of these procedures and limit their generalizability; moreover, USN evaluation and treatment currently lacks a gold standard. The field of technology has provided several promising tools that have been integrated within the clinical practice; over the years, a “first wave” has promoted computerized methods, which cannot provide an ecological and realistic environment and tasks. Thus, a “second wave” has fostered the implementation of virtual reality (VR) devices that, with different degrees of immersiveness, induce a sense of presence and allow patients to actively interact within the life-like setting. The present paper provides an updated, comprehensive picture of VR devices in the assessment and rehabilitation of USN, building on the review of Pedroli et al. (2015). The present paper analyzes the methodological and technological aspects of the studies selected, considering the issue of usability and ecological validity of virtual environments and tasks. Despite the technological advancement, the studies in this field lack methodological rigor as well as a proper evaluation of VR usability and should improve the ecological validity of VR-based assessment and rehabilitation of USN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9148943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91489432022-06-02 Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update Cavedoni, S. Cipresso, P. Mancuso, V. Bruni, F. Pedroli, E. Virtual Real Original Article Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a frequent repercussion of a cerebrovascular accident, typically a stroke. USN patients fail to orient their attention to the contralesional side to detect auditory, visual, and somatosensory stimuli, as well as to collect and purposely use this information. Traditional methods for USN assessment and rehabilitation include paper-and-pencil procedures, which address cognitive functions as isolated from other aspects of patients’ functioning within a real-life context. This might compromise the ecological validity of these procedures and limit their generalizability; moreover, USN evaluation and treatment currently lacks a gold standard. The field of technology has provided several promising tools that have been integrated within the clinical practice; over the years, a “first wave” has promoted computerized methods, which cannot provide an ecological and realistic environment and tasks. Thus, a “second wave” has fostered the implementation of virtual reality (VR) devices that, with different degrees of immersiveness, induce a sense of presence and allow patients to actively interact within the life-like setting. The present paper provides an updated, comprehensive picture of VR devices in the assessment and rehabilitation of USN, building on the review of Pedroli et al. (2015). The present paper analyzes the methodological and technological aspects of the studies selected, considering the issue of usability and ecological validity of virtual environments and tasks. Despite the technological advancement, the studies in this field lack methodological rigor as well as a proper evaluation of VR usability and should improve the ecological validity of VR-based assessment and rehabilitation of USN. Springer London 2022-05-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9148943/ /pubmed/35669614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00648-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cavedoni, S. Cipresso, P. Mancuso, V. Bruni, F. Pedroli, E. Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update |
title | Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update |
title_full | Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update |
title_fullStr | Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update |
title_short | Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update |
title_sort | virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? a 6-year review update |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00648-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cavedonis virtualrealityfortheassessmentandrehabilitationofneglectwherearewenowa6yearreviewupdate AT cipressop virtualrealityfortheassessmentandrehabilitationofneglectwherearewenowa6yearreviewupdate AT mancusov virtualrealityfortheassessmentandrehabilitationofneglectwherearewenowa6yearreviewupdate AT brunif virtualrealityfortheassessmentandrehabilitationofneglectwherearewenowa6yearreviewupdate AT pedrolie virtualrealityfortheassessmentandrehabilitationofneglectwherearewenowa6yearreviewupdate |