Cargando…

Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves

OBJECTIVE: Recently published studies have described slow spontaneous cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oscillations measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential drivers of brain glymphatic flow, with a similar frequency as intracranial B-waves. Aiming to establish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newell, David W., Nedergaard, Maiken, Aaslid, Rune
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.872701
_version_ 1784717158528319488
author Newell, David W.
Nedergaard, Maiken
Aaslid, Rune
author_facet Newell, David W.
Nedergaard, Maiken
Aaslid, Rune
author_sort Newell, David W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Recently published studies have described slow spontaneous cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oscillations measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential drivers of brain glymphatic flow, with a similar frequency as intracranial B-waves. Aiming to establish the relationship between these waveforms, we performed additional analysis of frequency and waveform parameters, of our previously published transcranial Doppler (TCD) and intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings of intracranial B waves, to compare to published MRI frequency measurements of CBF and CSF slow oscillations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed digital recordings of B waves in 29 patients with head injury, including middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow velocity (FV), ICP, end tidal CO(2), and arterial blood pressure (ABP). A subset of these recordings demonstrated high B wave activity and was further analyzed for parameters including frequency, interaction, and waveform distribution curve features. These measures were compared to published similar measurements of spontaneous CBF and CSF fluctuations evaluated using MRI. RESULTS: In patients with at least 10% amplitude B wave activity, the MCA blood flow velocity oscillations comprising the B waves, had a maximum amplitude at 0.0245 Hz, and time derivative a maximum amplitude at 0.035 Hz. The frequency range of the B waves was between 0.6–2.3 cycles per min (0.011-0.038 Hz), which is in the same range as MRI measured CBF slow oscillations, reported in human volunteers. Waveform asymmetry in MCA velocity and ICP cycles during B waves, was also similar to published MRI measured CBF slow oscillations. Cross-correlation analysis showed equivalent time derivatives of FV vs. ICP in B waves, compared to MRI measured CBF slow oscillations vs. CSF flow fluctuations. CONCLUSIONS: The TCD and ICP recordings of intracranial B waves show a similar frequency range as CBF and CSF flow oscillations measured using MRI, and share other unique morphological wave features. These findings strongly suggest a common physiological mechanism underlying the two classes of phenomena. The slow blood flow and volume oscillations causing intracranial B waves appear to be part of a cascade that may provide a significant driving force for compartmentalized CSF movement and facilitate glymphatic flow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9149212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91492122022-05-31 Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves Newell, David W. Nedergaard, Maiken Aaslid, Rune Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: Recently published studies have described slow spontaneous cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oscillations measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential drivers of brain glymphatic flow, with a similar frequency as intracranial B-waves. Aiming to establish the relationship between these waveforms, we performed additional analysis of frequency and waveform parameters, of our previously published transcranial Doppler (TCD) and intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings of intracranial B waves, to compare to published MRI frequency measurements of CBF and CSF slow oscillations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed digital recordings of B waves in 29 patients with head injury, including middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow velocity (FV), ICP, end tidal CO(2), and arterial blood pressure (ABP). A subset of these recordings demonstrated high B wave activity and was further analyzed for parameters including frequency, interaction, and waveform distribution curve features. These measures were compared to published similar measurements of spontaneous CBF and CSF fluctuations evaluated using MRI. RESULTS: In patients with at least 10% amplitude B wave activity, the MCA blood flow velocity oscillations comprising the B waves, had a maximum amplitude at 0.0245 Hz, and time derivative a maximum amplitude at 0.035 Hz. The frequency range of the B waves was between 0.6–2.3 cycles per min (0.011-0.038 Hz), which is in the same range as MRI measured CBF slow oscillations, reported in human volunteers. Waveform asymmetry in MCA velocity and ICP cycles during B waves, was also similar to published MRI measured CBF slow oscillations. Cross-correlation analysis showed equivalent time derivatives of FV vs. ICP in B waves, compared to MRI measured CBF slow oscillations vs. CSF flow fluctuations. CONCLUSIONS: The TCD and ICP recordings of intracranial B waves show a similar frequency range as CBF and CSF flow oscillations measured using MRI, and share other unique morphological wave features. These findings strongly suggest a common physiological mechanism underlying the two classes of phenomena. The slow blood flow and volume oscillations causing intracranial B waves appear to be part of a cascade that may provide a significant driving force for compartmentalized CSF movement and facilitate glymphatic flow. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9149212/ /pubmed/35651339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.872701 Text en Copyright © 2022 Newell, Nedergaard and Aaslid. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Newell, David W.
Nedergaard, Maiken
Aaslid, Rune
Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
title Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
title_full Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
title_fullStr Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
title_full_unstemmed Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
title_short Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
title_sort physiological mechanisms and significance of intracranial b waves
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.872701
work_keys_str_mv AT newelldavidw physiologicalmechanismsandsignificanceofintracranialbwaves
AT nedergaardmaiken physiologicalmechanismsandsignificanceofintracranialbwaves
AT aaslidrune physiologicalmechanismsandsignificanceofintracranialbwaves