Cargando…
Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts
Background: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the patient comfort during CT examinations with a modern CT scanner (Photon-Counting CT (PCCT)) and to compare the perceived patient comfort with a standard CT scanner. Methods: A total of 157 patients participated in this study and complet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030113 |
_version_ | 1784717308692791296 |
---|---|
author | Niehoff, Julius Henning Heuser, Andreas Michael, Arwed Elias Lennartz, Simon Borggrefe, Jan Kroeger, Jan Robert |
author_facet | Niehoff, Julius Henning Heuser, Andreas Michael, Arwed Elias Lennartz, Simon Borggrefe, Jan Kroeger, Jan Robert |
author_sort | Niehoff, Julius Henning |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the patient comfort during CT examinations with a modern CT scanner (Photon-Counting CT (PCCT)) and to compare the perceived patient comfort with a standard CT scanner. Methods: A total of 157 patients participated in this study and completed a questionnaire on their subjective perceptions after their CT examination. The following aspects of comfort were rated on a 5-point Likert scale: (1) claustrophobia in general and during the examination, (2) the effort to lie down and to get up from the CT table, (3) the speed and comfort of the CT table, (4) the difficulty of holding the breath during the CT scan, and (5) the communication during the examination. Results: Patients rated the modern CT scanner significantly better in terms of speed and comfort of the CT table and in terms of difficulty of holding their breath during the CT scan. The answers regarding the other aspects of comfort did not reveal significant differences. When asked for a comparison, patients who did perceive a difference between both scanners rated the modern CT scanner as more comfortable in all aspects of comfort. Conclusions: The survey did not reveal any major deficits in terms of comfort on the standard CT scanner. However, patients perceived the structural changes positively and appreciated the comfort of a modern CT scanner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9149918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91499182022-05-31 Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts Niehoff, Julius Henning Heuser, Andreas Michael, Arwed Elias Lennartz, Simon Borggrefe, Jan Kroeger, Jan Robert Tomography Article Background: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the patient comfort during CT examinations with a modern CT scanner (Photon-Counting CT (PCCT)) and to compare the perceived patient comfort with a standard CT scanner. Methods: A total of 157 patients participated in this study and completed a questionnaire on their subjective perceptions after their CT examination. The following aspects of comfort were rated on a 5-point Likert scale: (1) claustrophobia in general and during the examination, (2) the effort to lie down and to get up from the CT table, (3) the speed and comfort of the CT table, (4) the difficulty of holding the breath during the CT scan, and (5) the communication during the examination. Results: Patients rated the modern CT scanner significantly better in terms of speed and comfort of the CT table and in terms of difficulty of holding their breath during the CT scan. The answers regarding the other aspects of comfort did not reveal significant differences. When asked for a comparison, patients who did perceive a difference between both scanners rated the modern CT scanner as more comfortable in all aspects of comfort. Conclusions: The survey did not reveal any major deficits in terms of comfort on the standard CT scanner. However, patients perceived the structural changes positively and appreciated the comfort of a modern CT scanner. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9149918/ /pubmed/35645399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030113 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Niehoff, Julius Henning Heuser, Andreas Michael, Arwed Elias Lennartz, Simon Borggrefe, Jan Kroeger, Jan Robert Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts |
title | Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts |
title_full | Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts |
title_fullStr | Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts |
title_short | Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts |
title_sort | patient comfort in modern computed tomography: what really counts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niehoffjuliushenning patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts AT heuserandreas patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts AT michaelarwedelias patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts AT lennartzsimon patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts AT borggrefejan patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts AT kroegerjanrobert patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts |