Cargando…

Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts

Background: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the patient comfort during CT examinations with a modern CT scanner (Photon-Counting CT (PCCT)) and to compare the perceived patient comfort with a standard CT scanner. Methods: A total of 157 patients participated in this study and complet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niehoff, Julius Henning, Heuser, Andreas, Michael, Arwed Elias, Lennartz, Simon, Borggrefe, Jan, Kroeger, Jan Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030113
_version_ 1784717308692791296
author Niehoff, Julius Henning
Heuser, Andreas
Michael, Arwed Elias
Lennartz, Simon
Borggrefe, Jan
Kroeger, Jan Robert
author_facet Niehoff, Julius Henning
Heuser, Andreas
Michael, Arwed Elias
Lennartz, Simon
Borggrefe, Jan
Kroeger, Jan Robert
author_sort Niehoff, Julius Henning
collection PubMed
description Background: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the patient comfort during CT examinations with a modern CT scanner (Photon-Counting CT (PCCT)) and to compare the perceived patient comfort with a standard CT scanner. Methods: A total of 157 patients participated in this study and completed a questionnaire on their subjective perceptions after their CT examination. The following aspects of comfort were rated on a 5-point Likert scale: (1) claustrophobia in general and during the examination, (2) the effort to lie down and to get up from the CT table, (3) the speed and comfort of the CT table, (4) the difficulty of holding the breath during the CT scan, and (5) the communication during the examination. Results: Patients rated the modern CT scanner significantly better in terms of speed and comfort of the CT table and in terms of difficulty of holding their breath during the CT scan. The answers regarding the other aspects of comfort did not reveal significant differences. When asked for a comparison, patients who did perceive a difference between both scanners rated the modern CT scanner as more comfortable in all aspects of comfort. Conclusions: The survey did not reveal any major deficits in terms of comfort on the standard CT scanner. However, patients perceived the structural changes positively and appreciated the comfort of a modern CT scanner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9149918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91499182022-05-31 Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts Niehoff, Julius Henning Heuser, Andreas Michael, Arwed Elias Lennartz, Simon Borggrefe, Jan Kroeger, Jan Robert Tomography Article Background: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the patient comfort during CT examinations with a modern CT scanner (Photon-Counting CT (PCCT)) and to compare the perceived patient comfort with a standard CT scanner. Methods: A total of 157 patients participated in this study and completed a questionnaire on their subjective perceptions after their CT examination. The following aspects of comfort were rated on a 5-point Likert scale: (1) claustrophobia in general and during the examination, (2) the effort to lie down and to get up from the CT table, (3) the speed and comfort of the CT table, (4) the difficulty of holding the breath during the CT scan, and (5) the communication during the examination. Results: Patients rated the modern CT scanner significantly better in terms of speed and comfort of the CT table and in terms of difficulty of holding their breath during the CT scan. The answers regarding the other aspects of comfort did not reveal significant differences. When asked for a comparison, patients who did perceive a difference between both scanners rated the modern CT scanner as more comfortable in all aspects of comfort. Conclusions: The survey did not reveal any major deficits in terms of comfort on the standard CT scanner. However, patients perceived the structural changes positively and appreciated the comfort of a modern CT scanner. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9149918/ /pubmed/35645399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030113 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Niehoff, Julius Henning
Heuser, Andreas
Michael, Arwed Elias
Lennartz, Simon
Borggrefe, Jan
Kroeger, Jan Robert
Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts
title Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts
title_full Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts
title_fullStr Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts
title_full_unstemmed Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts
title_short Patient Comfort in Modern Computed Tomography: What Really Counts
title_sort patient comfort in modern computed tomography: what really counts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8030113
work_keys_str_mv AT niehoffjuliushenning patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts
AT heuserandreas patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts
AT michaelarwedelias patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts
AT lennartzsimon patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts
AT borggrefejan patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts
AT kroegerjanrobert patientcomfortinmoderncomputedtomographywhatreallycounts