Cargando…

Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers

(1) Background: The production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies should help minimize the severity of COVID-19 disease. Our focus was to investigate and compare different vaccination schedules, monitoring circulating S-RBD Ab (antibodies anti—Spike protein—Receptor Binding Domain) levels after administe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schipani, Maria Caterina, Tomassetti, Flaminia, Polidori, Isabella, Ricci, Paola, Frassanito, Maria Loredana, Seraceni, Silva, Morello, Maria, Nicolai, Eleonora, Aquaro, Stefano, Bernardini, Sergio, Pieri, Massimo, Calugi, Graziella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020025
_version_ 1784717323459887104
author Schipani, Maria Caterina
Tomassetti, Flaminia
Polidori, Isabella
Ricci, Paola
Frassanito, Maria Loredana
Seraceni, Silva
Morello, Maria
Nicolai, Eleonora
Aquaro, Stefano
Bernardini, Sergio
Pieri, Massimo
Calugi, Graziella
author_facet Schipani, Maria Caterina
Tomassetti, Flaminia
Polidori, Isabella
Ricci, Paola
Frassanito, Maria Loredana
Seraceni, Silva
Morello, Maria
Nicolai, Eleonora
Aquaro, Stefano
Bernardini, Sergio
Pieri, Massimo
Calugi, Graziella
author_sort Schipani, Maria Caterina
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: The production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies should help minimize the severity of COVID-19 disease. Our focus was to investigate and compare different vaccination schedules, monitoring circulating S-RBD Ab (antibodies anti—Spike protein—Receptor Binding Domain) levels after administering two doses in naïve patients. Likewise, vaccine-stimulated immunity in naïve and previously infected patients was compared. (2) Methods: We included 392 patients. Sera were evaluated by Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. Statistical analyses were conducted by MedCalc and JASP. (3) Results: In COVID-19 patients, the median value of Ab levels was 154 BAU/mL, stable up to 9 months after the infection. From the data observed in vaccinated patients, higher median values were recorded in COVID-19/Pfizer BioNTech (18913 BAU/mL) than in other groups (Pfizer BioNTech: 1841; ChadOx1 961; heterologous vaccination: 2687) BAU/mL. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, a single booster dose given to previously infected patients raised an antibody response much higher than two doses given to naïve individuals and heterologous vaccination generated a robust persistent antibody response at high levels, steady up to three months after administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9149979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91499792022-05-31 Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers Schipani, Maria Caterina Tomassetti, Flaminia Polidori, Isabella Ricci, Paola Frassanito, Maria Loredana Seraceni, Silva Morello, Maria Nicolai, Eleonora Aquaro, Stefano Bernardini, Sergio Pieri, Massimo Calugi, Graziella Diseases Article (1) Background: The production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies should help minimize the severity of COVID-19 disease. Our focus was to investigate and compare different vaccination schedules, monitoring circulating S-RBD Ab (antibodies anti—Spike protein—Receptor Binding Domain) levels after administering two doses in naïve patients. Likewise, vaccine-stimulated immunity in naïve and previously infected patients was compared. (2) Methods: We included 392 patients. Sera were evaluated by Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. Statistical analyses were conducted by MedCalc and JASP. (3) Results: In COVID-19 patients, the median value of Ab levels was 154 BAU/mL, stable up to 9 months after the infection. From the data observed in vaccinated patients, higher median values were recorded in COVID-19/Pfizer BioNTech (18913 BAU/mL) than in other groups (Pfizer BioNTech: 1841; ChadOx1 961; heterologous vaccination: 2687) BAU/mL. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, a single booster dose given to previously infected patients raised an antibody response much higher than two doses given to naïve individuals and heterologous vaccination generated a robust persistent antibody response at high levels, steady up to three months after administration. MDPI 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9149979/ /pubmed/35645246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020025 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schipani, Maria Caterina
Tomassetti, Flaminia
Polidori, Isabella
Ricci, Paola
Frassanito, Maria Loredana
Seraceni, Silva
Morello, Maria
Nicolai, Eleonora
Aquaro, Stefano
Bernardini, Sergio
Pieri, Massimo
Calugi, Graziella
Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers
title Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers
title_full Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers
title_fullStr Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers
title_short Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers
title_sort evaluation of natural and vaccine-induced anti-sars-cov-2 immunity: a comparative study between different groups of volunteers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020025
work_keys_str_mv AT schipanimariacaterina evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT tomassettiflaminia evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT polidoriisabella evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT riccipaola evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT frassanitomarialoredana evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT seracenisilva evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT morellomaria evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT nicolaieleonora evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT aquarostefano evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT bernardinisergio evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT pierimassimo evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers
AT calugigraziella evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers