Cargando…
Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers
(1) Background: The production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies should help minimize the severity of COVID-19 disease. Our focus was to investigate and compare different vaccination schedules, monitoring circulating S-RBD Ab (antibodies anti—Spike protein—Receptor Binding Domain) levels after administe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020025 |
_version_ | 1784717323459887104 |
---|---|
author | Schipani, Maria Caterina Tomassetti, Flaminia Polidori, Isabella Ricci, Paola Frassanito, Maria Loredana Seraceni, Silva Morello, Maria Nicolai, Eleonora Aquaro, Stefano Bernardini, Sergio Pieri, Massimo Calugi, Graziella |
author_facet | Schipani, Maria Caterina Tomassetti, Flaminia Polidori, Isabella Ricci, Paola Frassanito, Maria Loredana Seraceni, Silva Morello, Maria Nicolai, Eleonora Aquaro, Stefano Bernardini, Sergio Pieri, Massimo Calugi, Graziella |
author_sort | Schipani, Maria Caterina |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: The production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies should help minimize the severity of COVID-19 disease. Our focus was to investigate and compare different vaccination schedules, monitoring circulating S-RBD Ab (antibodies anti—Spike protein—Receptor Binding Domain) levels after administering two doses in naïve patients. Likewise, vaccine-stimulated immunity in naïve and previously infected patients was compared. (2) Methods: We included 392 patients. Sera were evaluated by Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. Statistical analyses were conducted by MedCalc and JASP. (3) Results: In COVID-19 patients, the median value of Ab levels was 154 BAU/mL, stable up to 9 months after the infection. From the data observed in vaccinated patients, higher median values were recorded in COVID-19/Pfizer BioNTech (18913 BAU/mL) than in other groups (Pfizer BioNTech: 1841; ChadOx1 961; heterologous vaccination: 2687) BAU/mL. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, a single booster dose given to previously infected patients raised an antibody response much higher than two doses given to naïve individuals and heterologous vaccination generated a robust persistent antibody response at high levels, steady up to three months after administration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9149979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91499792022-05-31 Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers Schipani, Maria Caterina Tomassetti, Flaminia Polidori, Isabella Ricci, Paola Frassanito, Maria Loredana Seraceni, Silva Morello, Maria Nicolai, Eleonora Aquaro, Stefano Bernardini, Sergio Pieri, Massimo Calugi, Graziella Diseases Article (1) Background: The production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies should help minimize the severity of COVID-19 disease. Our focus was to investigate and compare different vaccination schedules, monitoring circulating S-RBD Ab (antibodies anti—Spike protein—Receptor Binding Domain) levels after administering two doses in naïve patients. Likewise, vaccine-stimulated immunity in naïve and previously infected patients was compared. (2) Methods: We included 392 patients. Sera were evaluated by Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. Statistical analyses were conducted by MedCalc and JASP. (3) Results: In COVID-19 patients, the median value of Ab levels was 154 BAU/mL, stable up to 9 months after the infection. From the data observed in vaccinated patients, higher median values were recorded in COVID-19/Pfizer BioNTech (18913 BAU/mL) than in other groups (Pfizer BioNTech: 1841; ChadOx1 961; heterologous vaccination: 2687) BAU/mL. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, a single booster dose given to previously infected patients raised an antibody response much higher than two doses given to naïve individuals and heterologous vaccination generated a robust persistent antibody response at high levels, steady up to three months after administration. MDPI 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9149979/ /pubmed/35645246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020025 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schipani, Maria Caterina Tomassetti, Flaminia Polidori, Isabella Ricci, Paola Frassanito, Maria Loredana Seraceni, Silva Morello, Maria Nicolai, Eleonora Aquaro, Stefano Bernardini, Sergio Pieri, Massimo Calugi, Graziella Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers |
title | Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers |
title_full | Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers |
title_short | Evaluation of Natural and Vaccine-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunity: A Comparative Study between Different Groups of Volunteers |
title_sort | evaluation of natural and vaccine-induced anti-sars-cov-2 immunity: a comparative study between different groups of volunteers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35645246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schipanimariacaterina evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT tomassettiflaminia evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT polidoriisabella evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT riccipaola evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT frassanitomarialoredana evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT seracenisilva evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT morellomaria evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT nicolaieleonora evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT aquarostefano evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT bernardinisergio evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT pierimassimo evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers AT calugigraziella evaluationofnaturalandvaccineinducedantisarscov2immunityacomparativestudybetweendifferentgroupsofvolunteers |