Cargando…

Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins

Thermophilic proteins (TPPs) are critical for basic research and in the food industry due to their ability to maintain a thermodynamically stable fold at extremely high temperatures. Thus, the expeditious identification of novel TPPs through computational models from protein sequences is very desira...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charoenkwan, Phasit, Schaduangrat, Nalini, Hasan, Md Mehedi, Moni, Mohammad Ali, Lió, Pietro, Shoombuatong, Watshara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651661
http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2022-4723
_version_ 1784717332055064576
author Charoenkwan, Phasit
Schaduangrat, Nalini
Hasan, Md Mehedi
Moni, Mohammad Ali
Lió, Pietro
Shoombuatong, Watshara
author_facet Charoenkwan, Phasit
Schaduangrat, Nalini
Hasan, Md Mehedi
Moni, Mohammad Ali
Lió, Pietro
Shoombuatong, Watshara
author_sort Charoenkwan, Phasit
collection PubMed
description Thermophilic proteins (TPPs) are critical for basic research and in the food industry due to their ability to maintain a thermodynamically stable fold at extremely high temperatures. Thus, the expeditious identification of novel TPPs through computational models from protein sequences is very desirable. Over the last few decades, a number of computational methods, especially machine learning (ML)-based methods, for in silico prediction of TPPs have been developed. Therefore, it is desirable to revisit these methods and summarize their advantages and disadvantages in order to further develop new computational approaches to achieve more accurate and improved prediction of TPPs. With this goal in mind, we comprehensively investigate a large collection of fourteen state-of-the-art TPP predictors in terms of their dataset size, feature encoding schemes, feature selection strategies, ML algorithms, evaluation strategies and web server/software usability. To the best of our knowledge, this article represents the first comprehensive review on the development of ML-based methods for in silico prediction of TPPs. Among these TPP predictors, they can be classified into two groups according to the interpretability of ML algorithms employed (i.e., computational black-box methods and computational white-box methods). In order to perform the comparative analysis, we conducted a comparative study on several currently available TPP predictors based on two benchmark datasets. Finally, we provide future perspectives for the design and development of new computational models for TPP prediction. We hope that this comprehensive review will facilitate researchers in selecting an appropriate TPP predictor that is the most suitable one to deal with their purposes and provide useful perspectives for the development of more effective and accurate TPP predictors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9150013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91500132022-05-31 Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins Charoenkwan, Phasit Schaduangrat, Nalini Hasan, Md Mehedi Moni, Mohammad Ali Lió, Pietro Shoombuatong, Watshara EXCLI J Review Article Thermophilic proteins (TPPs) are critical for basic research and in the food industry due to their ability to maintain a thermodynamically stable fold at extremely high temperatures. Thus, the expeditious identification of novel TPPs through computational models from protein sequences is very desirable. Over the last few decades, a number of computational methods, especially machine learning (ML)-based methods, for in silico prediction of TPPs have been developed. Therefore, it is desirable to revisit these methods and summarize their advantages and disadvantages in order to further develop new computational approaches to achieve more accurate and improved prediction of TPPs. With this goal in mind, we comprehensively investigate a large collection of fourteen state-of-the-art TPP predictors in terms of their dataset size, feature encoding schemes, feature selection strategies, ML algorithms, evaluation strategies and web server/software usability. To the best of our knowledge, this article represents the first comprehensive review on the development of ML-based methods for in silico prediction of TPPs. Among these TPP predictors, they can be classified into two groups according to the interpretability of ML algorithms employed (i.e., computational black-box methods and computational white-box methods). In order to perform the comparative analysis, we conducted a comparative study on several currently available TPP predictors based on two benchmark datasets. Finally, we provide future perspectives for the design and development of new computational models for TPP prediction. We hope that this comprehensive review will facilitate researchers in selecting an appropriate TPP predictor that is the most suitable one to deal with their purposes and provide useful perspectives for the development of more effective and accurate TPP predictors. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9150013/ /pubmed/35651661 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2022-4723 Text en Copyright © 2022 Charoenkwan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Charoenkwan, Phasit
Schaduangrat, Nalini
Hasan, Md Mehedi
Moni, Mohammad Ali
Lió, Pietro
Shoombuatong, Watshara
Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins
title Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins
title_full Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins
title_fullStr Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins
title_full_unstemmed Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins
title_short Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins
title_sort empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651661
http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2022-4723
work_keys_str_mv AT charoenkwanphasit empiricalcomparisonandanalysisofmachinelearningbasedpredictorsforpredictingandanalyzingofthermophilicproteins
AT schaduangratnalini empiricalcomparisonandanalysisofmachinelearningbasedpredictorsforpredictingandanalyzingofthermophilicproteins
AT hasanmdmehedi empiricalcomparisonandanalysisofmachinelearningbasedpredictorsforpredictingandanalyzingofthermophilicproteins
AT monimohammadali empiricalcomparisonandanalysisofmachinelearningbasedpredictorsforpredictingandanalyzingofthermophilicproteins
AT liopietro empiricalcomparisonandanalysisofmachinelearningbasedpredictorsforpredictingandanalyzingofthermophilicproteins
AT shoombuatongwatshara empiricalcomparisonandanalysisofmachinelearningbasedpredictorsforpredictingandanalyzingofthermophilicproteins