Cargando…

Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)

BACKGROUND: Obtaining informed consent in people with acute stroke is complex since many, as a direct result of their stroke, lose capacity to make important decisions. Furthermore, reperfusion interventions are time dependent necessitating rapid consent. We developed four different consent approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindley, Richard I, Kane, Ingrid, Cohen, Geoff, Sandercock, Peter AG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17474930211037123
_version_ 1784717359789899776
author Lindley, Richard I
Kane, Ingrid
Cohen, Geoff
Sandercock, Peter AG
author_facet Lindley, Richard I
Kane, Ingrid
Cohen, Geoff
Sandercock, Peter AG
author_sort Lindley, Richard I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obtaining informed consent in people with acute stroke is complex since many, as a direct result of their stroke, lose capacity to make important decisions. Furthermore, reperfusion interventions are time dependent necessitating rapid consent. We developed four different consent approaches to facilitate recruitment of a broad range of patients in the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3). AIMS: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients recruited by different consent methods and the association between these methods and time from stroke onset to randomization. METHODS: IST-3 was a randomized controlled trial of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Clinicians could use one of four consent procedures: written consent, witnessed consent, assent, or a waiver of consent. We analyzed the relationship between consent procedure and baseline variables. The effect of consent procedure on delay time from onset to randomization was determined using analysis of variance to adjust for confounding effects. RESULTS: Of the 3035 patients recruited, the method of consent was known for 3034 (99.9%), and it was written in 985 subjects (32.5%), witnessed verbal consent in 280 (9.2%), assent by relative in 1727 (56.9%), and waiver of consent in 42 subjects (1.4%). Assent was required in 63.4% for those presenting 0–3 h from stroke onset (written consent in 25.3%). Patients with more severe neurological deficits (or with a non-lacunar hemispheric stroke syndrome) were less likely to give written consent. Mean delay between onset and randomization varied significantly between consent types (one-way analysis of variance: F = 15.7 on 3 df, p < 0.0001) (longest at 4.06 h for signed consent and 3.46 h for waiver of consent). CONCLUSIONS: Acute stroke trials requiring written informed consent would result in substantial selection bias. Flexible consent methods will ensure a broad range of patients are recruited, enabling trial results to be widely generalizable. Registration: This study’s registered number is ISRCTN25765518.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9150136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91501362022-05-31 Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) Lindley, Richard I Kane, Ingrid Cohen, Geoff Sandercock, Peter AG Int J Stroke Research BACKGROUND: Obtaining informed consent in people with acute stroke is complex since many, as a direct result of their stroke, lose capacity to make important decisions. Furthermore, reperfusion interventions are time dependent necessitating rapid consent. We developed four different consent approaches to facilitate recruitment of a broad range of patients in the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3). AIMS: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients recruited by different consent methods and the association between these methods and time from stroke onset to randomization. METHODS: IST-3 was a randomized controlled trial of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Clinicians could use one of four consent procedures: written consent, witnessed consent, assent, or a waiver of consent. We analyzed the relationship between consent procedure and baseline variables. The effect of consent procedure on delay time from onset to randomization was determined using analysis of variance to adjust for confounding effects. RESULTS: Of the 3035 patients recruited, the method of consent was known for 3034 (99.9%), and it was written in 985 subjects (32.5%), witnessed verbal consent in 280 (9.2%), assent by relative in 1727 (56.9%), and waiver of consent in 42 subjects (1.4%). Assent was required in 63.4% for those presenting 0–3 h from stroke onset (written consent in 25.3%). Patients with more severe neurological deficits (or with a non-lacunar hemispheric stroke syndrome) were less likely to give written consent. Mean delay between onset and randomization varied significantly between consent types (one-way analysis of variance: F = 15.7 on 3 df, p < 0.0001) (longest at 4.06 h for signed consent and 3.46 h for waiver of consent). CONCLUSIONS: Acute stroke trials requiring written informed consent would result in substantial selection bias. Flexible consent methods will ensure a broad range of patients are recruited, enabling trial results to be widely generalizable. Registration: This study’s registered number is ISRCTN25765518. SAGE Publications 2021-08-10 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9150136/ /pubmed/34292119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17474930211037123 Text en © 2021 World Stroke Organization https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research
Lindley, Richard I
Kane, Ingrid
Cohen, Geoff
Sandercock, Peter AG
Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)
title Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)
title_full Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)
title_fullStr Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)
title_short Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3)
title_sort factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: the third international stroke trial (ist-3)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17474930211037123
work_keys_str_mv AT lindleyrichardi factorsinfluencingtheuseofdifferentmethodsofconsentinarandomizedacutestroketrialthethirdinternationalstroketrialist3
AT kaneingrid factorsinfluencingtheuseofdifferentmethodsofconsentinarandomizedacutestroketrialthethirdinternationalstroketrialist3
AT cohengeoff factorsinfluencingtheuseofdifferentmethodsofconsentinarandomizedacutestroketrialthethirdinternationalstroketrialist3
AT sandercockpeterag factorsinfluencingtheuseofdifferentmethodsofconsentinarandomizedacutestroketrialthethirdinternationalstroketrialist3