Cargando…

Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems

INTRODUCTION: The current under-reporting of medical device malfunctions, difficulties with the current system and absence of continuous good-quality data has removed the possibility for constant data interrogation and trend recognition to identify evolving issues. This research used end user experi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tase, Arkeliana, Ni, Melody Z, Buckle, Peter W, Hanna, George B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001849
_version_ 1784717363638173696
author Tase, Arkeliana
Ni, Melody Z
Buckle, Peter W
Hanna, George B
author_facet Tase, Arkeliana
Ni, Melody Z
Buckle, Peter W
Hanna, George B
author_sort Tase, Arkeliana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The current under-reporting of medical device malfunctions, difficulties with the current system and absence of continuous good-quality data has removed the possibility for constant data interrogation and trend recognition to identify evolving issues. This research used end user experiences aiming to understand causes for the lack of data and knowledge on device performance and associated patient risks. This approach was used to identify existing barriers and methods for improvement. METHODS: This is a qualitative study involving semistructured interviews and surveys with clinicians (15 interviews, 39 surveys) and manufacturers (13 interview participants, 5 surveys). Multiple sources of recruiting were used. Data collected were thematically analysed. Interview results were used to design the surveys. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research was used. RESULTS: Medical device use is based on personal experience rather than evidence which is scarce. Multiple barriers to reporting were identified alongside patient safety and system related aspects. Furthermore, the acceptable level of error was variable as were effects on working practice. Many workarounds have been developed to overcome problems and have become normalised in daily work. These factors were found to have a limiting impact on improvements and learning. Greater system transparency, feedback on submitted reports, a more efficient system of reporting and better communication with manufacturers were reported as some of the required improvements. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified numerous complex issues affecting reporting of medical device performance and their subsequent effect on patient safety and clinical staff. The focus on incidents has created many limitations to learning and development. The rich experience of end users should be appropriately used to identify system weaknesses and seek improvement methods. Better communication methods should be developed between healthcare and MedTech (Medical Technologies) industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9150154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91501542022-06-16 Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems Tase, Arkeliana Ni, Melody Z Buckle, Peter W Hanna, George B BMJ Open Qual Original Research INTRODUCTION: The current under-reporting of medical device malfunctions, difficulties with the current system and absence of continuous good-quality data has removed the possibility for constant data interrogation and trend recognition to identify evolving issues. This research used end user experiences aiming to understand causes for the lack of data and knowledge on device performance and associated patient risks. This approach was used to identify existing barriers and methods for improvement. METHODS: This is a qualitative study involving semistructured interviews and surveys with clinicians (15 interviews, 39 surveys) and manufacturers (13 interview participants, 5 surveys). Multiple sources of recruiting were used. Data collected were thematically analysed. Interview results were used to design the surveys. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research was used. RESULTS: Medical device use is based on personal experience rather than evidence which is scarce. Multiple barriers to reporting were identified alongside patient safety and system related aspects. Furthermore, the acceptable level of error was variable as were effects on working practice. Many workarounds have been developed to overcome problems and have become normalised in daily work. These factors were found to have a limiting impact on improvements and learning. Greater system transparency, feedback on submitted reports, a more efficient system of reporting and better communication with manufacturers were reported as some of the required improvements. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified numerous complex issues affecting reporting of medical device performance and their subsequent effect on patient safety and clinical staff. The focus on incidents has created many limitations to learning and development. The rich experience of end users should be appropriately used to identify system weaknesses and seek improvement methods. Better communication methods should be developed between healthcare and MedTech (Medical Technologies) industry. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9150154/ /pubmed/35623652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001849 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Tase, Arkeliana
Ni, Melody Z
Buckle, Peter W
Hanna, George B
Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems
title Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems
title_full Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems
title_fullStr Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems
title_full_unstemmed Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems
title_short Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems
title_sort current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001849
work_keys_str_mv AT tasearkeliana currentstatusofmedicaldevicemalfunctionreportingusingenduserexperiencetoidentifycurrentproblems
AT nimelodyz currentstatusofmedicaldevicemalfunctionreportingusingenduserexperiencetoidentifycurrentproblems
AT bucklepeterw currentstatusofmedicaldevicemalfunctionreportingusingenduserexperiencetoidentifycurrentproblems
AT hannageorgeb currentstatusofmedicaldevicemalfunctionreportingusingenduserexperiencetoidentifycurrentproblems