Cargando…

Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most appropriate nutritional risk screening tool for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, five nutritional screening tools, including the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Scree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Bingxin, Sun, Yefei, Sun, Jian, Deng, Tingting, Jin, Baodi, Gao, Jia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057765
_version_ 1784717365334769664
author Xie, Bingxin
Sun, Yefei
Sun, Jian
Deng, Tingting
Jin, Baodi
Gao, Jia
author_facet Xie, Bingxin
Sun, Yefei
Sun, Jian
Deng, Tingting
Jin, Baodi
Gao, Jia
author_sort Xie, Bingxin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the most appropriate nutritional risk screening tool for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, five nutritional screening tools, including the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), were employed to evaluate the nutritional risk at admission and short-term clinical outcome prediction. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A comprehensive affiliated hospital of a university in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China. PARTICIPANTS: 301 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were continuously recruited to complete the study from October 2020 to May 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Within 48 hours of hospital admission, five nutritional screening tools were used to measure the nutritional risk and to determine their relationship with postoperative short-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The nutritional risk assesed by the five tools ranged from 25.2% to 46.2%. Taking the Subject Global Assessment as the diagnostic standard, MNA-SF had the best consistency (κ=0.570, p<0.001) and MST had the highest sensitivity (82.61%). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis after adjusting confounding factors showed that the NRS 2002 score ≥3 (OR 2.400, 95% CI 1.043 to 5.522) was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and was the strongest predictor of postoperative complications (area under the curve 0.621, 95% CI 0.549 to 0.692). The scores of NRS 2002 (r=0.131, p<0.001), MNA-SF (r=0.115, p<0.05) and NRI (r=0.187, p<0.05) were poorly correlated with the length of stay. There was no correlation between the five nutritional screening tools and hospitalisation costs (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the other four nutritional screening tools, we found that NRS 2002 is the most appropriate nutritional screening tool for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9150165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91501652022-06-16 Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study Xie, Bingxin Sun, Yefei Sun, Jian Deng, Tingting Jin, Baodi Gao, Jia BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism OBJECTIVES: To identify the most appropriate nutritional risk screening tool for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, five nutritional screening tools, including the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), were employed to evaluate the nutritional risk at admission and short-term clinical outcome prediction. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: A comprehensive affiliated hospital of a university in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China. PARTICIPANTS: 301 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were continuously recruited to complete the study from October 2020 to May 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Within 48 hours of hospital admission, five nutritional screening tools were used to measure the nutritional risk and to determine their relationship with postoperative short-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The nutritional risk assesed by the five tools ranged from 25.2% to 46.2%. Taking the Subject Global Assessment as the diagnostic standard, MNA-SF had the best consistency (κ=0.570, p<0.001) and MST had the highest sensitivity (82.61%). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis after adjusting confounding factors showed that the NRS 2002 score ≥3 (OR 2.400, 95% CI 1.043 to 5.522) was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and was the strongest predictor of postoperative complications (area under the curve 0.621, 95% CI 0.549 to 0.692). The scores of NRS 2002 (r=0.131, p<0.001), MNA-SF (r=0.115, p<0.05) and NRI (r=0.187, p<0.05) were poorly correlated with the length of stay. There was no correlation between the five nutritional screening tools and hospitalisation costs (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the other four nutritional screening tools, we found that NRS 2002 is the most appropriate nutritional screening tool for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9150165/ /pubmed/35623749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057765 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nutrition and Metabolism
Xie, Bingxin
Sun, Yefei
Sun, Jian
Deng, Tingting
Jin, Baodi
Gao, Jia
Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study
title Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study
title_full Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study
title_short Applicability of five nutritional screening tools in Chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study
title_sort applicability of five nutritional screening tools in chinese patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study
topic Nutrition and Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057765
work_keys_str_mv AT xiebingxin applicabilityoffivenutritionalscreeningtoolsinchinesepatientsundergoingcolorectalcancersurgeryacrosssectionalstudy
AT sunyefei applicabilityoffivenutritionalscreeningtoolsinchinesepatientsundergoingcolorectalcancersurgeryacrosssectionalstudy
AT sunjian applicabilityoffivenutritionalscreeningtoolsinchinesepatientsundergoingcolorectalcancersurgeryacrosssectionalstudy
AT dengtingting applicabilityoffivenutritionalscreeningtoolsinchinesepatientsundergoingcolorectalcancersurgeryacrosssectionalstudy
AT jinbaodi applicabilityoffivenutritionalscreeningtoolsinchinesepatientsundergoingcolorectalcancersurgeryacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaojia applicabilityoffivenutritionalscreeningtoolsinchinesepatientsundergoingcolorectalcancersurgeryacrosssectionalstudy