Cargando…

Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive Chinese patients. METHODS: Medical records of all adult pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Yuen Kwan, Ho, Ling Yin, Lee, Carolyn, To, Chi Hung, Mok, Chi Chiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221100300
_version_ 1784717376951943168
author Chung, Yuen Kwan
Ho, Ling Yin
Lee, Carolyn
To, Chi Hung
Mok, Chi Chiu
author_facet Chung, Yuen Kwan
Ho, Ling Yin
Lee, Carolyn
To, Chi Hung
Mok, Chi Chiu
author_sort Chung, Yuen Kwan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive Chinese patients. METHODS: Medical records of all adult patients who attended the rheumatology out-patient clinics between May and September 2019 were reviewed. Patients with ever ANA positive (titre ⩾1:80) were included and evaluated for the fulfilment of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and 1997 ACR criteria for SLE classification. The performance of these criteria in predicting a clinical diagnosis of SLE as judged by an independent panel of rheumatologists was studied and compared in different subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 1533 patients (88.2% women; age at first clinic attendance 45.5 ± 15.6 years) were studied and 562 patients were judged to be clinical SLE. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR (⩾10 points), SLICC and ACR criteria for a clinical diagnosis of SLE was 96.1%, 97.9% and 86.1%; and 85.8%, 86.3% and 94.3%, respectively. Applying the attribution rule to the non-SLE controls, the specificity of the three criteria increased to 95.0%, 92.5% and 98.8%, respectively. The specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria was higher in male patients (97.9%), those aged >50 years (97.0%) and disease duration of ⩽3 years (97.6%). Using a cut-off of 12 points, the specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria was further increased (96.6%) while a high sensitivity (95.0%) was maintained. CONCLUSION: In Chinese patients with a positive ANA, the EULAR/ACR criteria for clinical SLE perform equally well to the SLICC criteria. Both the EULAR/ACR and SLICC are more sensitive but less specific than the ACR criteria. The specificity of all the three criteria is enhanced by applying the attribution rule to controls. The specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria is higher in certain patient subgroups or when the cut-off score is raised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9150246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91502462022-05-31 Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients Chung, Yuen Kwan Ho, Ling Yin Lee, Carolyn To, Chi Hung Mok, Chi Chiu Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive Chinese patients. METHODS: Medical records of all adult patients who attended the rheumatology out-patient clinics between May and September 2019 were reviewed. Patients with ever ANA positive (titre ⩾1:80) were included and evaluated for the fulfilment of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and 1997 ACR criteria for SLE classification. The performance of these criteria in predicting a clinical diagnosis of SLE as judged by an independent panel of rheumatologists was studied and compared in different subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 1533 patients (88.2% women; age at first clinic attendance 45.5 ± 15.6 years) were studied and 562 patients were judged to be clinical SLE. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR (⩾10 points), SLICC and ACR criteria for a clinical diagnosis of SLE was 96.1%, 97.9% and 86.1%; and 85.8%, 86.3% and 94.3%, respectively. Applying the attribution rule to the non-SLE controls, the specificity of the three criteria increased to 95.0%, 92.5% and 98.8%, respectively. The specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria was higher in male patients (97.9%), those aged >50 years (97.0%) and disease duration of ⩽3 years (97.6%). Using a cut-off of 12 points, the specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria was further increased (96.6%) while a high sensitivity (95.0%) was maintained. CONCLUSION: In Chinese patients with a positive ANA, the EULAR/ACR criteria for clinical SLE perform equally well to the SLICC criteria. Both the EULAR/ACR and SLICC are more sensitive but less specific than the ACR criteria. The specificity of all the three criteria is enhanced by applying the attribution rule to controls. The specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria is higher in certain patient subgroups or when the cut-off score is raised. SAGE Publications 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9150246/ /pubmed/35651982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221100300 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chung, Yuen Kwan
Ho, Ling Yin
Lee, Carolyn
To, Chi Hung
Mok, Chi Chiu
Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients
title Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients
title_full Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients
title_fullStr Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients
title_short Validation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ANA-positive Chinese patients
title_sort validation of the 2019 eular/acr classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in ana-positive chinese patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221100300
work_keys_str_mv AT chungyuenkwan validationofthe2019eularacrclassificationcriteriaforsystemiclupuserythematosusinanapositivechinesepatients
AT holingyin validationofthe2019eularacrclassificationcriteriaforsystemiclupuserythematosusinanapositivechinesepatients
AT leecarolyn validationofthe2019eularacrclassificationcriteriaforsystemiclupuserythematosusinanapositivechinesepatients
AT tochihung validationofthe2019eularacrclassificationcriteriaforsystemiclupuserythematosusinanapositivechinesepatients
AT mokchichiu validationofthe2019eularacrclassificationcriteriaforsystemiclupuserythematosusinanapositivechinesepatients