Cargando…
Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
Although infection by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is relatively rare, consequences can be severe, with a high case-fatality rate in vulnerable populations. A quantitative, probabilistic risk assessment tool was developed to compare estimates of the number of invasive listeriosis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000327 |
_version_ | 1784717407614402560 |
---|---|
author | FALK, L. E. FADER, K. A. CUI, D. S. TOTTON, S. C. FAZIL, A. M. LAMMERDING, A. M. SMITH, B. A. |
author_facet | FALK, L. E. FADER, K. A. CUI, D. S. TOTTON, S. C. FAZIL, A. M. LAMMERDING, A. M. SMITH, B. A. |
author_sort | FALK, L. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although infection by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is relatively rare, consequences can be severe, with a high case-fatality rate in vulnerable populations. A quantitative, probabilistic risk assessment tool was developed to compare estimates of the number of invasive listeriosis cases in vulnerable Canadian subpopulations given consumption of contaminated ready-to-eat delicatessen meats and hot dogs, under various user-defined scenarios. The model incorporates variability and uncertainty through Monte Carlo simulation. Processes considered within the model include cross-contamination, growth, risk factor prevalence, subpopulation susceptibilities, and thermal inactivation. Hypothetical contamination events were simulated. Results demonstrated varying risk depending on the consumer risk factors and implicated product (turkey delicatessen meat without growth inhibitors ranked highest for this scenario). The majority (80%) of listeriosis cases were predicted in at-risk subpopulations comprising only 20% of the total Canadian population, with the greatest number of predicted cases in the subpopulation with dialysis and/or liver disease. This tool can be used to simulate conditions and outcomes under different scenarios, such as a contamination event and/or outbreak, to inform public health interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9150414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91504142022-06-10 Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data FALK, L. E. FADER, K. A. CUI, D. S. TOTTON, S. C. FAZIL, A. M. LAMMERDING, A. M. SMITH, B. A. Epidemiol Infect Original Papers Although infection by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is relatively rare, consequences can be severe, with a high case-fatality rate in vulnerable populations. A quantitative, probabilistic risk assessment tool was developed to compare estimates of the number of invasive listeriosis cases in vulnerable Canadian subpopulations given consumption of contaminated ready-to-eat delicatessen meats and hot dogs, under various user-defined scenarios. The model incorporates variability and uncertainty through Monte Carlo simulation. Processes considered within the model include cross-contamination, growth, risk factor prevalence, subpopulation susceptibilities, and thermal inactivation. Hypothetical contamination events were simulated. Results demonstrated varying risk depending on the consumer risk factors and implicated product (turkey delicatessen meat without growth inhibitors ranked highest for this scenario). The majority (80%) of listeriosis cases were predicted in at-risk subpopulations comprising only 20% of the total Canadian population, with the greatest number of predicted cases in the subpopulation with dialysis and/or liver disease. This tool can be used to simulate conditions and outcomes under different scenarios, such as a contamination event and/or outbreak, to inform public health interventions. Cambridge University Press 2016-10 2016-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9150414/ /pubmed/27019157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000327 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers FALK, L. E. FADER, K. A. CUI, D. S. TOTTON, S. C. FAZIL, A. M. LAMMERDING, A. M. SMITH, B. A. Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data |
title | Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data |
title_full | Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data |
title_fullStr | Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data |
title_short | Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data |
title_sort | comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT falkle comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata AT faderka comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata AT cuids comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata AT tottonsc comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata AT fazilam comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata AT lammerdingam comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata AT smithba comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata |