Cargando…

Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data

Although infection by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is relatively rare, consequences can be severe, with a high case-fatality rate in vulnerable populations. A quantitative, probabilistic risk assessment tool was developed to compare estimates of the number of invasive listeriosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: FALK, L. E., FADER, K. A., CUI, D. S., TOTTON, S. C., FAZIL, A. M., LAMMERDING, A. M., SMITH, B. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000327
_version_ 1784717407614402560
author FALK, L. E.
FADER, K. A.
CUI, D. S.
TOTTON, S. C.
FAZIL, A. M.
LAMMERDING, A. M.
SMITH, B. A.
author_facet FALK, L. E.
FADER, K. A.
CUI, D. S.
TOTTON, S. C.
FAZIL, A. M.
LAMMERDING, A. M.
SMITH, B. A.
author_sort FALK, L. E.
collection PubMed
description Although infection by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is relatively rare, consequences can be severe, with a high case-fatality rate in vulnerable populations. A quantitative, probabilistic risk assessment tool was developed to compare estimates of the number of invasive listeriosis cases in vulnerable Canadian subpopulations given consumption of contaminated ready-to-eat delicatessen meats and hot dogs, under various user-defined scenarios. The model incorporates variability and uncertainty through Monte Carlo simulation. Processes considered within the model include cross-contamination, growth, risk factor prevalence, subpopulation susceptibilities, and thermal inactivation. Hypothetical contamination events were simulated. Results demonstrated varying risk depending on the consumer risk factors and implicated product (turkey delicatessen meat without growth inhibitors ranked highest for this scenario). The majority (80%) of listeriosis cases were predicted in at-risk subpopulations comprising only 20% of the total Canadian population, with the greatest number of predicted cases in the subpopulation with dialysis and/or liver disease. This tool can be used to simulate conditions and outcomes under different scenarios, such as a contamination event and/or outbreak, to inform public health interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9150414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91504142022-06-10 Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data FALK, L. E. FADER, K. A. CUI, D. S. TOTTON, S. C. FAZIL, A. M. LAMMERDING, A. M. SMITH, B. A. Epidemiol Infect Original Papers Although infection by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is relatively rare, consequences can be severe, with a high case-fatality rate in vulnerable populations. A quantitative, probabilistic risk assessment tool was developed to compare estimates of the number of invasive listeriosis cases in vulnerable Canadian subpopulations given consumption of contaminated ready-to-eat delicatessen meats and hot dogs, under various user-defined scenarios. The model incorporates variability and uncertainty through Monte Carlo simulation. Processes considered within the model include cross-contamination, growth, risk factor prevalence, subpopulation susceptibilities, and thermal inactivation. Hypothetical contamination events were simulated. Results demonstrated varying risk depending on the consumer risk factors and implicated product (turkey delicatessen meat without growth inhibitors ranked highest for this scenario). The majority (80%) of listeriosis cases were predicted in at-risk subpopulations comprising only 20% of the total Canadian population, with the greatest number of predicted cases in the subpopulation with dialysis and/or liver disease. This tool can be used to simulate conditions and outcomes under different scenarios, such as a contamination event and/or outbreak, to inform public health interventions. Cambridge University Press 2016-10 2016-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9150414/ /pubmed/27019157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000327 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
FALK, L. E.
FADER, K. A.
CUI, D. S.
TOTTON, S. C.
FAZIL, A. M.
LAMMERDING, A. M.
SMITH, B. A.
Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
title Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
title_full Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
title_fullStr Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
title_full_unstemmed Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
title_short Comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
title_sort comparing listeriosis risks in at-risk populations using a user-friendly quantitative microbial risk assessment tool and epidemiological data
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9150414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000327
work_keys_str_mv AT falkle comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata
AT faderka comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata
AT cuids comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata
AT tottonsc comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata
AT fazilam comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata
AT lammerdingam comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata
AT smithba comparinglisteriosisrisksinatriskpopulationsusingauserfriendlyquantitativemicrobialriskassessmenttoolandepidemiologicaldata