Cargando…

Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies

Prior to registering and marketing any new pharmaceutical, (agro)chemical or food ingredient product manufacturers must, by law, generate data to ensure human safety. Safety testing requirements vary depending on sector, but generally repeat-dose testing in animals form the basis for human health ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sewell, Fiona, Corvaro, Marco, Andrus, Amanda, Burke, Jonathan, Daston, George, Delaney, Bryan, Domoradzki, Jeanne, Forlini, Carole, Green, Maia Louise, Hofmann, Thomas, Jäckel, Sven, Lee, Moung Sook, Temerowski, Michael, Whalley, Paul, Lewis, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03293-3
_version_ 1784717498319372288
author Sewell, Fiona
Corvaro, Marco
Andrus, Amanda
Burke, Jonathan
Daston, George
Delaney, Bryan
Domoradzki, Jeanne
Forlini, Carole
Green, Maia Louise
Hofmann, Thomas
Jäckel, Sven
Lee, Moung Sook
Temerowski, Michael
Whalley, Paul
Lewis, Richard
author_facet Sewell, Fiona
Corvaro, Marco
Andrus, Amanda
Burke, Jonathan
Daston, George
Delaney, Bryan
Domoradzki, Jeanne
Forlini, Carole
Green, Maia Louise
Hofmann, Thomas
Jäckel, Sven
Lee, Moung Sook
Temerowski, Michael
Whalley, Paul
Lewis, Richard
author_sort Sewell, Fiona
collection PubMed
description Prior to registering and marketing any new pharmaceutical, (agro)chemical or food ingredient product manufacturers must, by law, generate data to ensure human safety. Safety testing requirements vary depending on sector, but generally repeat-dose testing in animals form the basis for human health risk assessments. Dose level selection is an important consideration when designing such studies, to ensure that exposure levels that lead to relevant hazards are identified. Advice on dose level selection is provided in test guidelines and allied guidance documents, but it is not well harmonised, particularly for selection of the highest dose tested. This paper further builds on concepts developed in a technical report by the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) which recommends pragmatic approaches to dose selection considering regulatory requirements, animal welfare and state of the art scientific approaches. Industry sectors have differing degrees of freedom to operate regarding dose level selection, depending on the purpose of the studies and the regulatory requirements/legislation, and this is reflected in the overall recommended approaches. An understanding of systemic exposure should be utilised where possible (e.g., through toxicokinetic approaches) and used together with apical endpoints from existing toxicity studies to guide more appropriate dose level selection. The highest dose should be limited to a reasonable level, causing minimal but evident toxicity to the test animals without significantly compromising their well-being. As the science of predictive human exposure further develops and matures, this will provide exciting and novel opportunities for more human-relevant approaches to dose level selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9151511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91515112022-06-01 Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies Sewell, Fiona Corvaro, Marco Andrus, Amanda Burke, Jonathan Daston, George Delaney, Bryan Domoradzki, Jeanne Forlini, Carole Green, Maia Louise Hofmann, Thomas Jäckel, Sven Lee, Moung Sook Temerowski, Michael Whalley, Paul Lewis, Richard Arch Toxicol Review Article Prior to registering and marketing any new pharmaceutical, (agro)chemical or food ingredient product manufacturers must, by law, generate data to ensure human safety. Safety testing requirements vary depending on sector, but generally repeat-dose testing in animals form the basis for human health risk assessments. Dose level selection is an important consideration when designing such studies, to ensure that exposure levels that lead to relevant hazards are identified. Advice on dose level selection is provided in test guidelines and allied guidance documents, but it is not well harmonised, particularly for selection of the highest dose tested. This paper further builds on concepts developed in a technical report by the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) which recommends pragmatic approaches to dose selection considering regulatory requirements, animal welfare and state of the art scientific approaches. Industry sectors have differing degrees of freedom to operate regarding dose level selection, depending on the purpose of the studies and the regulatory requirements/legislation, and this is reflected in the overall recommended approaches. An understanding of systemic exposure should be utilised where possible (e.g., through toxicokinetic approaches) and used together with apical endpoints from existing toxicity studies to guide more appropriate dose level selection. The highest dose should be limited to a reasonable level, causing minimal but evident toxicity to the test animals without significantly compromising their well-being. As the science of predictive human exposure further develops and matures, this will provide exciting and novel opportunities for more human-relevant approaches to dose level selection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9151511/ /pubmed/35486138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03293-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Sewell, Fiona
Corvaro, Marco
Andrus, Amanda
Burke, Jonathan
Daston, George
Delaney, Bryan
Domoradzki, Jeanne
Forlini, Carole
Green, Maia Louise
Hofmann, Thomas
Jäckel, Sven
Lee, Moung Sook
Temerowski, Michael
Whalley, Paul
Lewis, Richard
Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies
title Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies
title_full Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies
title_fullStr Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies
title_short Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies
title_sort recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03293-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sewellfiona recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT corvaromarco recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT andrusamanda recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT burkejonathan recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT dastongeorge recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT delaneybryan recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT domoradzkijeanne recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT forlinicarole recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT greenmaialouise recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT hofmannthomas recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT jackelsven recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT leemoungsook recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT temerowskimichael recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT whalleypaul recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies
AT lewisrichard recommendationsondoselevelselectionforrepeatdosetoxicitystudies