Cargando…
Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is a feasible and safe procedure with a relatively smooth learning curve. However, single-incision LLLS requires extensive surgical experience and advanced techniques. The aim of this study is to report the standardized single-incision plus one...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02340-4 |
_version_ | 1784717512338833408 |
---|---|
author | Katagiri, Hirokatsu Nitta, Hiroyuki Takahara, Takeshi Hasegawa, Yasushi Kanno, Syoji Umemura, Akira Takeda, Daiki Makabe, Kenji Kikuchi, Koji Kimura, Taku Yanari, Shingo Sasaki, Akira |
author_facet | Katagiri, Hirokatsu Nitta, Hiroyuki Takahara, Takeshi Hasegawa, Yasushi Kanno, Syoji Umemura, Akira Takeda, Daiki Makabe, Kenji Kikuchi, Koji Kimura, Taku Yanari, Shingo Sasaki, Akira |
author_sort | Katagiri, Hirokatsu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is a feasible and safe procedure with a relatively smooth learning curve. However, single-incision LLLS requires extensive surgical experience and advanced techniques. The aim of this study is to report the standardized single-incision plus one-port LLLS (reduced port LLLS, RPLLLS) technique and evaluate its safety, feasibility, and effectiveness for junior surgeons. METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2020, the clinical records of 49 patients who underwent LLLS, divided into the conventional LLLS (n = 37) and the RPLLLS group (n = 12), were retrospectively reviewed. The patient characteristics, pathologic results, and operative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A history of previous abdominal surgery in the RPLLLS group was significantly high (56.8% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.552). Notably, junior surgeons performed 62.2% of the conventional LLLSs and 58.4% of the standardized RPLLLSs. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of median operative time (121.0 vs. 113.5, p = 0.387), median blood loss (13.0 vs. 8.5, p = 0.518), median length of hospital stays (7.0 vs. 7.0, p = 0.408), and morbidity rate (2.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.565), respectively. CONCLUSION: This standardized RPLLLS is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional LLLS and may become the ideal training procedure for both junior surgeons and surgeons aiming to learn more complex procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9151572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91515722022-06-01 Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure Katagiri, Hirokatsu Nitta, Hiroyuki Takahara, Takeshi Hasegawa, Yasushi Kanno, Syoji Umemura, Akira Takeda, Daiki Makabe, Kenji Kikuchi, Koji Kimura, Taku Yanari, Shingo Sasaki, Akira Langenbecks Arch Surg How-I-Do-It articles PURPOSE: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is a feasible and safe procedure with a relatively smooth learning curve. However, single-incision LLLS requires extensive surgical experience and advanced techniques. The aim of this study is to report the standardized single-incision plus one-port LLLS (reduced port LLLS, RPLLLS) technique and evaluate its safety, feasibility, and effectiveness for junior surgeons. METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2020, the clinical records of 49 patients who underwent LLLS, divided into the conventional LLLS (n = 37) and the RPLLLS group (n = 12), were retrospectively reviewed. The patient characteristics, pathologic results, and operative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A history of previous abdominal surgery in the RPLLLS group was significantly high (56.8% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.552). Notably, junior surgeons performed 62.2% of the conventional LLLSs and 58.4% of the standardized RPLLLSs. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of median operative time (121.0 vs. 113.5, p = 0.387), median blood loss (13.0 vs. 8.5, p = 0.518), median length of hospital stays (7.0 vs. 7.0, p = 0.408), and morbidity rate (2.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.565), respectively. CONCLUSION: This standardized RPLLLS is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional LLLS and may become the ideal training procedure for both junior surgeons and surgeons aiming to learn more complex procedures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9151572/ /pubmed/34866161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02340-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | How-I-Do-It articles Katagiri, Hirokatsu Nitta, Hiroyuki Takahara, Takeshi Hasegawa, Yasushi Kanno, Syoji Umemura, Akira Takeda, Daiki Makabe, Kenji Kikuchi, Koji Kimura, Taku Yanari, Shingo Sasaki, Akira Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure |
title | Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure |
title_full | Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure |
title_fullStr | Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure |
title_short | Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure |
title_sort | standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure |
topic | How-I-Do-It articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02340-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katagirihirokatsu standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT nittahiroyuki standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT takaharatakeshi standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT hasegawayasushi standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT kannosyoji standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT umemuraakira standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT takedadaiki standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT makabekenji standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT kikuchikoji standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT kimurataku standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT yanarishingo standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure AT sasakiakira standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure |