Cargando…

Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is a feasible and safe procedure with a relatively smooth learning curve. However, single-incision LLLS requires extensive surgical experience and advanced techniques. The aim of this study is to report the standardized single-incision plus one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katagiri, Hirokatsu, Nitta, Hiroyuki, Takahara, Takeshi, Hasegawa, Yasushi, Kanno, Syoji, Umemura, Akira, Takeda, Daiki, Makabe, Kenji, Kikuchi, Koji, Kimura, Taku, Yanari, Shingo, Sasaki, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02340-4
_version_ 1784717512338833408
author Katagiri, Hirokatsu
Nitta, Hiroyuki
Takahara, Takeshi
Hasegawa, Yasushi
Kanno, Syoji
Umemura, Akira
Takeda, Daiki
Makabe, Kenji
Kikuchi, Koji
Kimura, Taku
Yanari, Shingo
Sasaki, Akira
author_facet Katagiri, Hirokatsu
Nitta, Hiroyuki
Takahara, Takeshi
Hasegawa, Yasushi
Kanno, Syoji
Umemura, Akira
Takeda, Daiki
Makabe, Kenji
Kikuchi, Koji
Kimura, Taku
Yanari, Shingo
Sasaki, Akira
author_sort Katagiri, Hirokatsu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is a feasible and safe procedure with a relatively smooth learning curve. However, single-incision LLLS requires extensive surgical experience and advanced techniques. The aim of this study is to report the standardized single-incision plus one-port LLLS (reduced port LLLS, RPLLLS) technique and evaluate its safety, feasibility, and effectiveness for junior surgeons. METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2020, the clinical records of 49 patients who underwent LLLS, divided into the conventional LLLS (n = 37) and the RPLLLS group (n = 12), were retrospectively reviewed. The patient characteristics, pathologic results, and operative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A history of previous abdominal surgery in the RPLLLS group was significantly high (56.8% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.552). Notably, junior surgeons performed 62.2% of the conventional LLLSs and 58.4% of the standardized RPLLLSs. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of median operative time (121.0 vs. 113.5, p = 0.387), median blood loss (13.0 vs. 8.5, p = 0.518), median length of hospital stays (7.0 vs. 7.0, p = 0.408), and morbidity rate (2.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.565), respectively. CONCLUSION: This standardized RPLLLS is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional LLLS and may become the ideal training procedure for both junior surgeons and surgeons aiming to learn more complex procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9151572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91515722022-06-01 Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure Katagiri, Hirokatsu Nitta, Hiroyuki Takahara, Takeshi Hasegawa, Yasushi Kanno, Syoji Umemura, Akira Takeda, Daiki Makabe, Kenji Kikuchi, Koji Kimura, Taku Yanari, Shingo Sasaki, Akira Langenbecks Arch Surg How-I-Do-It articles PURPOSE: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) is a feasible and safe procedure with a relatively smooth learning curve. However, single-incision LLLS requires extensive surgical experience and advanced techniques. The aim of this study is to report the standardized single-incision plus one-port LLLS (reduced port LLLS, RPLLLS) technique and evaluate its safety, feasibility, and effectiveness for junior surgeons. METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2020, the clinical records of 49 patients who underwent LLLS, divided into the conventional LLLS (n = 37) and the RPLLLS group (n = 12), were retrospectively reviewed. The patient characteristics, pathologic results, and operative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A history of previous abdominal surgery in the RPLLLS group was significantly high (56.8% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.552). Notably, junior surgeons performed 62.2% of the conventional LLLSs and 58.4% of the standardized RPLLLSs. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of median operative time (121.0 vs. 113.5, p = 0.387), median blood loss (13.0 vs. 8.5, p = 0.518), median length of hospital stays (7.0 vs. 7.0, p = 0.408), and morbidity rate (2.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.565), respectively. CONCLUSION: This standardized RPLLLS is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional LLLS and may become the ideal training procedure for both junior surgeons and surgeons aiming to learn more complex procedures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9151572/ /pubmed/34866161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02340-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle How-I-Do-It articles
Katagiri, Hirokatsu
Nitta, Hiroyuki
Takahara, Takeshi
Hasegawa, Yasushi
Kanno, Syoji
Umemura, Akira
Takeda, Daiki
Makabe, Kenji
Kikuchi, Koji
Kimura, Taku
Yanari, Shingo
Sasaki, Akira
Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
title Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
title_full Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
title_fullStr Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
title_full_unstemmed Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
title_short Standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
title_sort standardized single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a safe alternative to the conventional procedure
topic How-I-Do-It articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02340-4
work_keys_str_mv AT katagirihirokatsu standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT nittahiroyuki standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT takaharatakeshi standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT hasegawayasushi standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT kannosyoji standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT umemuraakira standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT takedadaiki standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT makabekenji standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT kikuchikoji standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT kimurataku standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT yanarishingo standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure
AT sasakiakira standardizedsingleincisionplusoneportlaparoscopicleftlateralsectionectomyasafealternativetotheconventionalprocedure