Cargando…
The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study
BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function depend on cardiac loading conditions, which are altered by positive pressure ventilation. The direct effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cardiac diastolic function are unknown. METHODS: Twenty-five patients without appa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02014-1 |
_version_ | 1784717531148189696 |
---|---|
author | Berger, David Wigger, Olivier de Marchi, Stefano Grübler, Martin R. Bloch, Andreas Kurmann, Reto Stalder, Odile Bachmann, Kaspar Felix Bloechlinger, Stefan |
author_facet | Berger, David Wigger, Olivier de Marchi, Stefano Grübler, Martin R. Bloch, Andreas Kurmann, Reto Stalder, Odile Bachmann, Kaspar Felix Bloechlinger, Stefan |
author_sort | Berger, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function depend on cardiac loading conditions, which are altered by positive pressure ventilation. The direct effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cardiac diastolic function are unknown. METHODS: Twenty-five patients without apparent diastolic dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography were ventilated noninvasively at PEEPs of 0, 5, and 10 cmH(2)O (in randomized order). Echocardiographic diastolic assessment and pressure–volume-loop analysis from conductance catheters were compared. The time constant for pressure decay (τ) was modeled with exponential decay. End-diastolic and end-systolic pressure volume relationships (EDPVRs and ESPVRs, respectively) from temporary caval occlusion were analyzed with generalized linear mixed-effects and linear mixed models. Transmural pressures were calculated using esophageal balloons. RESULTS: τ values for intracavitary cardiac pressure increased with the PEEP (n = 25; no PEEP, 44 ± 5 ms; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 46 ± 6 ms; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 45 ± 6 ms; p < 0.001). This increase disappeared when corrected for transmural pressure and diastole length. The transmural EDPVR was unaffected by PEEP. The ESPVR increased slightly with PEEP. Echocardiographic mitral inflow parameters and tissue Doppler values decreased with PEEP [peak E wave (n = 25): no PEEP, 0.76 ± 0.13 m/s; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.14 m/s; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.68 ± 0.13 m/s; p = 0.016; peak A wave (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.12 m/s; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.7 ± 0.11 m/s; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.67 ± 0.15 m/s; p = 0.014; E’ septal (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.085 ± 0.016 m/s; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.08 ± 0.013 m/s; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.075 ± 0.012 m/s; p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP does not affect active diastolic relaxation or passive ventricular filling properties. Dynamic echocardiographic filling parameters may reflect changing loading conditions rather than intrinsic diastolic function. PEEP may have slight positive inotropic effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02267291, registered 17. October 2014. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02014-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9151717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91517172022-06-01 The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study Berger, David Wigger, Olivier de Marchi, Stefano Grübler, Martin R. Bloch, Andreas Kurmann, Reto Stalder, Odile Bachmann, Kaspar Felix Bloechlinger, Stefan Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function depend on cardiac loading conditions, which are altered by positive pressure ventilation. The direct effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cardiac diastolic function are unknown. METHODS: Twenty-five patients without apparent diastolic dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography were ventilated noninvasively at PEEPs of 0, 5, and 10 cmH(2)O (in randomized order). Echocardiographic diastolic assessment and pressure–volume-loop analysis from conductance catheters were compared. The time constant for pressure decay (τ) was modeled with exponential decay. End-diastolic and end-systolic pressure volume relationships (EDPVRs and ESPVRs, respectively) from temporary caval occlusion were analyzed with generalized linear mixed-effects and linear mixed models. Transmural pressures were calculated using esophageal balloons. RESULTS: τ values for intracavitary cardiac pressure increased with the PEEP (n = 25; no PEEP, 44 ± 5 ms; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 46 ± 6 ms; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 45 ± 6 ms; p < 0.001). This increase disappeared when corrected for transmural pressure and diastole length. The transmural EDPVR was unaffected by PEEP. The ESPVR increased slightly with PEEP. Echocardiographic mitral inflow parameters and tissue Doppler values decreased with PEEP [peak E wave (n = 25): no PEEP, 0.76 ± 0.13 m/s; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.14 m/s; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.68 ± 0.13 m/s; p = 0.016; peak A wave (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.74 ± 0.12 m/s; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.7 ± 0.11 m/s; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.67 ± 0.15 m/s; p = 0.014; E’ septal (n = 24): no PEEP, 0.085 ± 0.016 m/s; 5 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.08 ± 0.013 m/s; 10 cmH(2)O PEEP, 0.075 ± 0.012 m/s; p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP does not affect active diastolic relaxation or passive ventricular filling properties. Dynamic echocardiographic filling parameters may reflect changing loading conditions rather than intrinsic diastolic function. PEEP may have slight positive inotropic effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02267291, registered 17. October 2014. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02014-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9151717/ /pubmed/35381904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02014-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Berger, David Wigger, Olivier de Marchi, Stefano Grübler, Martin R. Bloch, Andreas Kurmann, Reto Stalder, Odile Bachmann, Kaspar Felix Bloechlinger, Stefan The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study |
title | The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study |
title_full | The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study |
title_fullStr | The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study |
title_short | The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study |
title_sort | effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9151717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02014-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergerdavid theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT wiggerolivier theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT demarchistefano theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT grublermartinr theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT blochandreas theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT kurmannreto theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT stalderodile theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT bachmannkasparfelix theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT bloechlingerstefan theeffectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT bergerdavid effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT wiggerolivier effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT demarchistefano effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT grublermartinr effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT blochandreas effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT kurmannreto effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT stalderodile effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT bachmannkasparfelix effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy AT bloechlingerstefan effectsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacfunctionacomparativeechocardiographyconductancecatheterstudy |