Cargando…

Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency

The coordinated relationship between urban population–land spatial patterns (UPLSPs) and ecological efficiency (EE) is conducive not only to the rational utilization of resources and environment and the sustainable development of society, but also to the provision of a living environment that benefi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Ling, Jiang, Yuehua, Liu, Cuicui, Zhang, Jing, Zhang, Guanghong, Cui, Xufeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.890175
_version_ 1784717576284143616
author Shan, Ling
Jiang, Yuehua
Liu, Cuicui
Zhang, Jing
Zhang, Guanghong
Cui, Xufeng
author_facet Shan, Ling
Jiang, Yuehua
Liu, Cuicui
Zhang, Jing
Zhang, Guanghong
Cui, Xufeng
author_sort Shan, Ling
collection PubMed
description The coordinated relationship between urban population–land spatial patterns (UPLSPs) and ecological efficiency (EE) is conducive not only to the rational utilization of resources and environment and the sustainable development of society, but also to the provision of a living environment that benefits public health. Identifying the coupling relationship of urban development and EE can provide critical information for urban planning. Previous studies have mainly focused on the coupling relationship between urban population and land, urbanization, and ecological development, while ignoring that between UPLSPs and EE. This study integrates several models to construct a novel framework for coupling UPLSPs and EE. Taking Hubei Province as the research area, we calculate the UPLSPs, EE, and their coupling coordination degree for 12 cities from 2000 to 2019. The paper offers several conclusions. (1) the urban population–land spatial matching degree increased, but the overall matching level was not high; the average value of EE showed an “N”-shaped change trajectory, and its overall level was low, with small changes and obvious regional differences. (2) The average value of the coupling coordination degree between UPLSPs and EE was a slow upward trend, with a radial distribution high in the middle and low in the periphery. There was conflict between the spatial patterns and EE, and the former restricted the development of the latter. (3) There were strong correlations between coordination degree and various indicators of UPLSPs and EE. While we should revitalize the stock of construction land and optimize the upgrading of the industrial structure, we also must coordinate human and land resources and the ecological environment, and narrow regional development differences. This study provides a new framework for urban environmental assessment and urban planning decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9152127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91521272022-06-01 Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency Shan, Ling Jiang, Yuehua Liu, Cuicui Zhang, Jing Zhang, Guanghong Cui, Xufeng Front Public Health Public Health The coordinated relationship between urban population–land spatial patterns (UPLSPs) and ecological efficiency (EE) is conducive not only to the rational utilization of resources and environment and the sustainable development of society, but also to the provision of a living environment that benefits public health. Identifying the coupling relationship of urban development and EE can provide critical information for urban planning. Previous studies have mainly focused on the coupling relationship between urban population and land, urbanization, and ecological development, while ignoring that between UPLSPs and EE. This study integrates several models to construct a novel framework for coupling UPLSPs and EE. Taking Hubei Province as the research area, we calculate the UPLSPs, EE, and their coupling coordination degree for 12 cities from 2000 to 2019. The paper offers several conclusions. (1) the urban population–land spatial matching degree increased, but the overall matching level was not high; the average value of EE showed an “N”-shaped change trajectory, and its overall level was low, with small changes and obvious regional differences. (2) The average value of the coupling coordination degree between UPLSPs and EE was a slow upward trend, with a radial distribution high in the middle and low in the periphery. There was conflict between the spatial patterns and EE, and the former restricted the development of the latter. (3) There were strong correlations between coordination degree and various indicators of UPLSPs and EE. While we should revitalize the stock of construction land and optimize the upgrading of the industrial structure, we also must coordinate human and land resources and the ecological environment, and narrow regional development differences. This study provides a new framework for urban environmental assessment and urban planning decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9152127/ /pubmed/35655461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.890175 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shan, Jiang, Liu, Zhang, Zhang and Cui. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Shan, Ling
Jiang, Yuehua
Liu, Cuicui
Zhang, Jing
Zhang, Guanghong
Cui, Xufeng
Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency
title Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency
title_full Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency
title_fullStr Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency
title_short Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population–Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency
title_sort conflict or coordination? spatiotemporal coupling of urban population–land spatial patterns and ecological efficiency
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.890175
work_keys_str_mv AT shanling conflictorcoordinationspatiotemporalcouplingofurbanpopulationlandspatialpatternsandecologicalefficiency
AT jiangyuehua conflictorcoordinationspatiotemporalcouplingofurbanpopulationlandspatialpatternsandecologicalefficiency
AT liucuicui conflictorcoordinationspatiotemporalcouplingofurbanpopulationlandspatialpatternsandecologicalefficiency
AT zhangjing conflictorcoordinationspatiotemporalcouplingofurbanpopulationlandspatialpatternsandecologicalefficiency
AT zhangguanghong conflictorcoordinationspatiotemporalcouplingofurbanpopulationlandspatialpatternsandecologicalefficiency
AT cuixufeng conflictorcoordinationspatiotemporalcouplingofurbanpopulationlandspatialpatternsandecologicalefficiency