Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is confirmed to be more effective for preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) than first-generation triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole), but its economic value has not been comprehensively evaluated in China. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Changcheng, Ye, Jian, Xie, Yaping, Dong, Rong, Jin, Weizhong, Wang, Linling, Fang, Yingying, Shan, Qiyuan, Lin, Nengming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.884846
_version_ 1784717609284927488
author Shi, Changcheng
Ye, Jian
Xie, Yaping
Dong, Rong
Jin, Weizhong
Wang, Linling
Fang, Yingying
Shan, Qiyuan
Lin, Nengming
author_facet Shi, Changcheng
Ye, Jian
Xie, Yaping
Dong, Rong
Jin, Weizhong
Wang, Linling
Fang, Yingying
Shan, Qiyuan
Lin, Nengming
author_sort Shi, Changcheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is confirmed to be more effective for preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) than first-generation triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole), but its economic value has not been comprehensively evaluated in China. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in hematological-malignancy patients at high risk for IFIs from the Chinese healthcare perspective. METHODS: A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were built using published data to estimate the total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole oral suspension and first-generation triazoles. Regimens with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) lower than the threshold of willingness to pay (WTP) were considered cost-effective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. The regional imbalance of economic development and the tablet formulation of posaconazole were considered in the scenario analyses. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, posaconazole oral suspension provided an additional 0.109 QALYs at an incremental cost of $954.7, yielding an ICER of $8,784.4/QALY, below the national WTP threshold of $31,315/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust. Scenario analyses showed that the base-case ICER was consistently below the WTP thresholds of all 31 Chinese provinces, with the likelihood of posaconazole being cost-effectiveness ranging from 78.1 to 99.0%. When the posaconazole oral suspension was replaced by the tablet formulation, the ICER increased to $29,214.1/QALY, still below the national WTP threshold and WTP thresholds of 12 provinces. CONCLUSIONS: Posaconazole oral suspension is a highly cost-effective regimen for preventing IFI in high-risk hematological-malignancy patients from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Posaconazole tablets may also be considered in some high-income regions of China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9152267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91522672022-06-01 Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China Shi, Changcheng Ye, Jian Xie, Yaping Dong, Rong Jin, Weizhong Wang, Linling Fang, Yingying Shan, Qiyuan Lin, Nengming Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is confirmed to be more effective for preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) than first-generation triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole), but its economic value has not been comprehensively evaluated in China. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in hematological-malignancy patients at high risk for IFIs from the Chinese healthcare perspective. METHODS: A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were built using published data to estimate the total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole oral suspension and first-generation triazoles. Regimens with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) lower than the threshold of willingness to pay (WTP) were considered cost-effective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. The regional imbalance of economic development and the tablet formulation of posaconazole were considered in the scenario analyses. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, posaconazole oral suspension provided an additional 0.109 QALYs at an incremental cost of $954.7, yielding an ICER of $8,784.4/QALY, below the national WTP threshold of $31,315/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust. Scenario analyses showed that the base-case ICER was consistently below the WTP thresholds of all 31 Chinese provinces, with the likelihood of posaconazole being cost-effectiveness ranging from 78.1 to 99.0%. When the posaconazole oral suspension was replaced by the tablet formulation, the ICER increased to $29,214.1/QALY, still below the national WTP threshold and WTP thresholds of 12 provinces. CONCLUSIONS: Posaconazole oral suspension is a highly cost-effective regimen for preventing IFI in high-risk hematological-malignancy patients from the Chinese healthcare perspective. Posaconazole tablets may also be considered in some high-income regions of China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9152267/ /pubmed/35655452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.884846 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shi, Ye, Xie, Dong, Jin, Wang, Fang, Shan and Lin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Shi, Changcheng
Ye, Jian
Xie, Yaping
Dong, Rong
Jin, Weizhong
Wang, Linling
Fang, Yingying
Shan, Qiyuan
Lin, Nengming
Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China
title Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness of posaconazole vs. first-generation triazoles for the prevention of invasive fungal infections among high-risk patients with hematological malignancies in china
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.884846
work_keys_str_mv AT shichangcheng costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT yejian costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT xieyaping costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT dongrong costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT jinweizhong costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT wanglinling costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT fangyingying costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT shanqiyuan costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina
AT linnengming costeffectivenessofposaconazolevsfirstgenerationtriazolesforthepreventionofinvasivefungalinfectionsamonghighriskpatientswithhematologicalmalignanciesinchina