Cargando…

Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is based on low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) is an alternative strategy, based on specific settings of the airway p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lescroart, Mickael, Pequignot, Benjamin, Bitker, Laurent, Pina, Héloïse, Tran, N'Guyen, Hébert, Jean-Louis, Richard, Jean-Christophe, Lévy, Bruno, Koszutski, Matthieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.883950
_version_ 1784717644296880128
author Lescroart, Mickael
Pequignot, Benjamin
Bitker, Laurent
Pina, Héloïse
Tran, N'Guyen
Hébert, Jean-Louis
Richard, Jean-Christophe
Lévy, Bruno
Koszutski, Matthieu
author_facet Lescroart, Mickael
Pequignot, Benjamin
Bitker, Laurent
Pina, Héloïse
Tran, N'Guyen
Hébert, Jean-Louis
Richard, Jean-Christophe
Lévy, Bruno
Koszutski, Matthieu
author_sort Lescroart, Mickael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current standard of care during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is based on low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) is an alternative strategy, based on specific settings of the airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode. Briefly, TCAV reduces lung injury, including: (1) an improvement in alveolar recruitment and homogeneity; (2) reduction in alveolar and alveolar duct micro-strain and stress-risers. TCAV can result in higher intra-thoracic pressures and thus impair hemodynamics resulting from heart-lung interactions. The objective of our study was to compare hemodynamics between TCAV and conventional protective ventilation in a porcine ARDS model. METHODS: In 10 pigs (63–73 kg), lung injury was induced by repeated bronchial saline lavages followed by 2 h of injurious ventilation. The animals were then randomized into two groups: (1) Conventional protective ventilation with a VT of 6 mL/kg and PEEP adjusted to a plateau pressure set between 28 and 30 cmH(2)O; (2) TCAV group with P-high set between 27 and 29 cmH(2)O, P-low at 0 cmH(2)O, T-low adjusted to terminate at 75% of the expiratory flow peak, and T-high at 3–4 s, with I:E > 6:1. RESULTS: Both lung elastance and PaO(2):FiO(2) were consistent with severe ARDS after 2 h of injurious mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in systemic arterial blood pressure, pulmonary blood pressure or cardiac output between Conventional protective ventilation and TCAV. Levels of total PEEP were significantly higher in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). Driving pressure and lung elastance were significantly lower in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: No hemodynamic adverse events were observed in the TCAV group compared as to the standard protective ventilation group in this swine ARDS model, and TCAV appeared to be beneficial to the respiratory system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9152423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91524232022-06-01 Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model Lescroart, Mickael Pequignot, Benjamin Bitker, Laurent Pina, Héloïse Tran, N'Guyen Hébert, Jean-Louis Richard, Jean-Christophe Lévy, Bruno Koszutski, Matthieu Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: The current standard of care during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is based on low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) is an alternative strategy, based on specific settings of the airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode. Briefly, TCAV reduces lung injury, including: (1) an improvement in alveolar recruitment and homogeneity; (2) reduction in alveolar and alveolar duct micro-strain and stress-risers. TCAV can result in higher intra-thoracic pressures and thus impair hemodynamics resulting from heart-lung interactions. The objective of our study was to compare hemodynamics between TCAV and conventional protective ventilation in a porcine ARDS model. METHODS: In 10 pigs (63–73 kg), lung injury was induced by repeated bronchial saline lavages followed by 2 h of injurious ventilation. The animals were then randomized into two groups: (1) Conventional protective ventilation with a VT of 6 mL/kg and PEEP adjusted to a plateau pressure set between 28 and 30 cmH(2)O; (2) TCAV group with P-high set between 27 and 29 cmH(2)O, P-low at 0 cmH(2)O, T-low adjusted to terminate at 75% of the expiratory flow peak, and T-high at 3–4 s, with I:E > 6:1. RESULTS: Both lung elastance and PaO(2):FiO(2) were consistent with severe ARDS after 2 h of injurious mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in systemic arterial blood pressure, pulmonary blood pressure or cardiac output between Conventional protective ventilation and TCAV. Levels of total PEEP were significantly higher in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). Driving pressure and lung elastance were significantly lower in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: No hemodynamic adverse events were observed in the TCAV group compared as to the standard protective ventilation group in this swine ARDS model, and TCAV appeared to be beneficial to the respiratory system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9152423/ /pubmed/35655856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.883950 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lescroart, Pequignot, Bitker, Pina, Tran, Hébert, Richard, Lévy and Koszutski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Lescroart, Mickael
Pequignot, Benjamin
Bitker, Laurent
Pina, Héloïse
Tran, N'Guyen
Hébert, Jean-Louis
Richard, Jean-Christophe
Lévy, Bruno
Koszutski, Matthieu
Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model
title Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model
title_full Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model
title_fullStr Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model
title_full_unstemmed Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model
title_short Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model
title_sort time-controlled adaptive ventilation does not induce hemodynamic impairment in a swine ards model
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.883950
work_keys_str_mv AT lescroartmickael timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT pequignotbenjamin timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT bitkerlaurent timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT pinaheloise timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT trannguyen timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT hebertjeanlouis timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT richardjeanchristophe timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT levybruno timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel
AT koszutskimatthieu timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel