Cargando…
Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model
BACKGROUND: The current standard of care during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is based on low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) is an alternative strategy, based on specific settings of the airway p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.883950 |
_version_ | 1784717644296880128 |
---|---|
author | Lescroart, Mickael Pequignot, Benjamin Bitker, Laurent Pina, Héloïse Tran, N'Guyen Hébert, Jean-Louis Richard, Jean-Christophe Lévy, Bruno Koszutski, Matthieu |
author_facet | Lescroart, Mickael Pequignot, Benjamin Bitker, Laurent Pina, Héloïse Tran, N'Guyen Hébert, Jean-Louis Richard, Jean-Christophe Lévy, Bruno Koszutski, Matthieu |
author_sort | Lescroart, Mickael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current standard of care during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is based on low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) is an alternative strategy, based on specific settings of the airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode. Briefly, TCAV reduces lung injury, including: (1) an improvement in alveolar recruitment and homogeneity; (2) reduction in alveolar and alveolar duct micro-strain and stress-risers. TCAV can result in higher intra-thoracic pressures and thus impair hemodynamics resulting from heart-lung interactions. The objective of our study was to compare hemodynamics between TCAV and conventional protective ventilation in a porcine ARDS model. METHODS: In 10 pigs (63–73 kg), lung injury was induced by repeated bronchial saline lavages followed by 2 h of injurious ventilation. The animals were then randomized into two groups: (1) Conventional protective ventilation with a VT of 6 mL/kg and PEEP adjusted to a plateau pressure set between 28 and 30 cmH(2)O; (2) TCAV group with P-high set between 27 and 29 cmH(2)O, P-low at 0 cmH(2)O, T-low adjusted to terminate at 75% of the expiratory flow peak, and T-high at 3–4 s, with I:E > 6:1. RESULTS: Both lung elastance and PaO(2):FiO(2) were consistent with severe ARDS after 2 h of injurious mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in systemic arterial blood pressure, pulmonary blood pressure or cardiac output between Conventional protective ventilation and TCAV. Levels of total PEEP were significantly higher in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). Driving pressure and lung elastance were significantly lower in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: No hemodynamic adverse events were observed in the TCAV group compared as to the standard protective ventilation group in this swine ARDS model, and TCAV appeared to be beneficial to the respiratory system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9152423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91524232022-06-01 Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model Lescroart, Mickael Pequignot, Benjamin Bitker, Laurent Pina, Héloïse Tran, N'Guyen Hébert, Jean-Louis Richard, Jean-Christophe Lévy, Bruno Koszutski, Matthieu Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: The current standard of care during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is based on low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) is an alternative strategy, based on specific settings of the airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode. Briefly, TCAV reduces lung injury, including: (1) an improvement in alveolar recruitment and homogeneity; (2) reduction in alveolar and alveolar duct micro-strain and stress-risers. TCAV can result in higher intra-thoracic pressures and thus impair hemodynamics resulting from heart-lung interactions. The objective of our study was to compare hemodynamics between TCAV and conventional protective ventilation in a porcine ARDS model. METHODS: In 10 pigs (63–73 kg), lung injury was induced by repeated bronchial saline lavages followed by 2 h of injurious ventilation. The animals were then randomized into two groups: (1) Conventional protective ventilation with a VT of 6 mL/kg and PEEP adjusted to a plateau pressure set between 28 and 30 cmH(2)O; (2) TCAV group with P-high set between 27 and 29 cmH(2)O, P-low at 0 cmH(2)O, T-low adjusted to terminate at 75% of the expiratory flow peak, and T-high at 3–4 s, with I:E > 6:1. RESULTS: Both lung elastance and PaO(2):FiO(2) were consistent with severe ARDS after 2 h of injurious mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in systemic arterial blood pressure, pulmonary blood pressure or cardiac output between Conventional protective ventilation and TCAV. Levels of total PEEP were significantly higher in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). Driving pressure and lung elastance were significantly lower in the TCAV group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: No hemodynamic adverse events were observed in the TCAV group compared as to the standard protective ventilation group in this swine ARDS model, and TCAV appeared to be beneficial to the respiratory system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9152423/ /pubmed/35655856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.883950 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lescroart, Pequignot, Bitker, Pina, Tran, Hébert, Richard, Lévy and Koszutski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Lescroart, Mickael Pequignot, Benjamin Bitker, Laurent Pina, Héloïse Tran, N'Guyen Hébert, Jean-Louis Richard, Jean-Christophe Lévy, Bruno Koszutski, Matthieu Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model |
title | Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model |
title_full | Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model |
title_fullStr | Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model |
title_short | Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation Does Not Induce Hemodynamic Impairment in a Swine ARDS Model |
title_sort | time-controlled adaptive ventilation does not induce hemodynamic impairment in a swine ards model |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.883950 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lescroartmickael timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT pequignotbenjamin timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT bitkerlaurent timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT pinaheloise timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT trannguyen timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT hebertjeanlouis timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT richardjeanchristophe timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT levybruno timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel AT koszutskimatthieu timecontrolledadaptiveventilationdoesnotinducehemodynamicimpairmentinaswineardsmodel |