Cargando…

Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation

OBJECTIVES: To examine the understanding and practice of shared decision-making (SDM) within the context of recovery-oriented care across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units. DESIGN: VHA inpatient mental health units were scored on the Recovery-Oriented Acute Inpat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eliacin, Johanne, Carter, Jessica, Bass, Emily, Flanagan, Mindy, Salyers, Michelle P, McGuire, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057300
_version_ 1784717747629850624
author Eliacin, Johanne
Carter, Jessica
Bass, Emily
Flanagan, Mindy
Salyers, Michelle P
McGuire, Alan
author_facet Eliacin, Johanne
Carter, Jessica
Bass, Emily
Flanagan, Mindy
Salyers, Michelle P
McGuire, Alan
author_sort Eliacin, Johanne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the understanding and practice of shared decision-making (SDM) within the context of recovery-oriented care across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units. DESIGN: VHA inpatient mental health units were scored on the Recovery-Oriented Acute Inpatient Scale (RAIN). Scores on the RAIN item for medication SDM were used to rank each site from lowest to highest. The top 7 and bottom 8 sites (n=15) were selected for additional analyses using a mixed-methods approach, involving qualitative interviews, observation notes and quantitative data. SETTING: 34 VHA inpatient mental health units located in every geographical region of the USA. PARTICIPANTS: 55 treatment team members. RESULTS: Our results identified an overarching theme of ‘power-sharing’ that describes participants’ conceptualisation and practice of medication decision-making. Three levels of power sharing emerged from both interview and observational data: (1) No power sharing: patients are excluded from treatment decisions; (2) Limited power sharing: patients are informed of treatment decisions but have limited influence on the decision-making process; and (3) Shared-power: patients and providers work collaboratively and contribute to medication decisions. Comparing interview to observational data, only observational data indicating those themes differentiate top from bottom scoring sites on the RAIN SDM item scores. All but one top scoring sites indicated shared power medication decision processes, whereas bottom sites reflected mostly no power sharing. Additionally, our findings highlight three key factors that facilitate the implementation of SDM: inclusion of veteran in treatment teams, patient education and respect for patient autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of SDM appears feasible in acute inpatient mental health units. Although most participants were well informed about SDM, that knowledge did not always translate into practice, which supports the need for ongoing implementation support for SDM. Additional contextual factors underscore the value of patients’ self-determination as a guiding principle for SDM, highlighting the role of a supporting, empowering and autonomy-generating environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9152945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91529452022-06-16 Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation Eliacin, Johanne Carter, Jessica Bass, Emily Flanagan, Mindy Salyers, Michelle P McGuire, Alan BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: To examine the understanding and practice of shared decision-making (SDM) within the context of recovery-oriented care across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units. DESIGN: VHA inpatient mental health units were scored on the Recovery-Oriented Acute Inpatient Scale (RAIN). Scores on the RAIN item for medication SDM were used to rank each site from lowest to highest. The top 7 and bottom 8 sites (n=15) were selected for additional analyses using a mixed-methods approach, involving qualitative interviews, observation notes and quantitative data. SETTING: 34 VHA inpatient mental health units located in every geographical region of the USA. PARTICIPANTS: 55 treatment team members. RESULTS: Our results identified an overarching theme of ‘power-sharing’ that describes participants’ conceptualisation and practice of medication decision-making. Three levels of power sharing emerged from both interview and observational data: (1) No power sharing: patients are excluded from treatment decisions; (2) Limited power sharing: patients are informed of treatment decisions but have limited influence on the decision-making process; and (3) Shared-power: patients and providers work collaboratively and contribute to medication decisions. Comparing interview to observational data, only observational data indicating those themes differentiate top from bottom scoring sites on the RAIN SDM item scores. All but one top scoring sites indicated shared power medication decision processes, whereas bottom sites reflected mostly no power sharing. Additionally, our findings highlight three key factors that facilitate the implementation of SDM: inclusion of veteran in treatment teams, patient education and respect for patient autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of SDM appears feasible in acute inpatient mental health units. Although most participants were well informed about SDM, that knowledge did not always translate into practice, which supports the need for ongoing implementation support for SDM. Additional contextual factors underscore the value of patients’ self-determination as a guiding principle for SDM, highlighting the role of a supporting, empowering and autonomy-generating environment. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9152945/ /pubmed/35636799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057300 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Eliacin, Johanne
Carter, Jessica
Bass, Emily
Flanagan, Mindy
Salyers, Michelle P
McGuire, Alan
Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
title Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_full Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_fullStr Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_short Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_sort implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across us veterans health administration (vha) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057300
work_keys_str_mv AT eliacinjohanne implementationandstaffunderstandingofshareddecisionmakinginthecontextofrecoveryorientedcareacrossusveteranshealthadministrationvhainpatientmentalhealthcareunitsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT carterjessica implementationandstaffunderstandingofshareddecisionmakinginthecontextofrecoveryorientedcareacrossusveteranshealthadministrationvhainpatientmentalhealthcareunitsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT bassemily implementationandstaffunderstandingofshareddecisionmakinginthecontextofrecoveryorientedcareacrossusveteranshealthadministrationvhainpatientmentalhealthcareunitsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT flanaganmindy implementationandstaffunderstandingofshareddecisionmakinginthecontextofrecoveryorientedcareacrossusveteranshealthadministrationvhainpatientmentalhealthcareunitsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT salyersmichellep implementationandstaffunderstandingofshareddecisionmakinginthecontextofrecoveryorientedcareacrossusveteranshealthadministrationvhainpatientmentalhealthcareunitsamixedmethodsevaluation
AT mcguirealan implementationandstaffunderstandingofshareddecisionmakinginthecontextofrecoveryorientedcareacrossusveteranshealthadministrationvhainpatientmentalhealthcareunitsamixedmethodsevaluation