Cargando…

Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The Japanese diabetes treatment guidelines do not specify the first choice of hypoglycemic agents, unlike those of Western countries. Furthermore, the current situation in diabetes treatment is that the choice of hypoglycemic agents is determined by each physician. Therefore, we a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uehira, Yudai, Ueno, Hiroaki, Ebihara, Emi, Uchida, Taisuke, Nabekura, Hiroki, Sakoda, Hideyuki, Yonekawa, Tadato, Yamaguchi, Hideki, Nakazato, Masamitsu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13750
_version_ 1784717921700806656
author Uehira, Yudai
Ueno, Hiroaki
Ebihara, Emi
Uchida, Taisuke
Nabekura, Hiroki
Sakoda, Hideyuki
Yonekawa, Tadato
Yamaguchi, Hideki
Nakazato, Masamitsu
author_facet Uehira, Yudai
Ueno, Hiroaki
Ebihara, Emi
Uchida, Taisuke
Nabekura, Hiroki
Sakoda, Hideyuki
Yonekawa, Tadato
Yamaguchi, Hideki
Nakazato, Masamitsu
author_sort Uehira, Yudai
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The Japanese diabetes treatment guidelines do not specify the first choice of hypoglycemic agents, unlike those of Western countries. Furthermore, the current situation in diabetes treatment is that the choice of hypoglycemic agents is determined by each physician. Therefore, we aimed to determine the current situation in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in this context. For this, we carried out a questionnaire survey among physicians twice regarding the target value of glycated hemoglobin and the choice of hypoglycemic agents in various cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered an unsigned questionnaire to physicians in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in July 2016 and March 2020. We divided responses into those of diabetologists and those of non‐diabetologists, and analyzed each response. We then compared the results between both years. RESULTS: In total, 18 diabetologists and 142 non‐diabetologists responded in 2016, and 21 diabetologists and 134 non‐diabetologists responded in 2020. Many diabetologists chose biguanide as the first‐line drug for obese type 2 diabetes patients. In addition, the rate of choice of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) among physicians almost increased in 2020. Some non‐diabetologists, and even a few diabetologists, inappropriately chose SGLT2i and biguanide for patients with severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Because SGLT2i became available in 2016 and a few years have passed, both diabetologists and non‐diabetologists seemed to refrain from prescribing SGLT2i. However, with the emergence of various lines of firm evidence regarding the use of SGLT2i, physicians started to prescribe it. However, some diabetologists and non‐diabetologists chose hypoglycemic agents inadequately; therefore, there is a need for novel and precise information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9153846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91538462022-06-05 Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 Uehira, Yudai Ueno, Hiroaki Ebihara, Emi Uchida, Taisuke Nabekura, Hiroki Sakoda, Hideyuki Yonekawa, Tadato Yamaguchi, Hideki Nakazato, Masamitsu J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The Japanese diabetes treatment guidelines do not specify the first choice of hypoglycemic agents, unlike those of Western countries. Furthermore, the current situation in diabetes treatment is that the choice of hypoglycemic agents is determined by each physician. Therefore, we aimed to determine the current situation in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in this context. For this, we carried out a questionnaire survey among physicians twice regarding the target value of glycated hemoglobin and the choice of hypoglycemic agents in various cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered an unsigned questionnaire to physicians in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in July 2016 and March 2020. We divided responses into those of diabetologists and those of non‐diabetologists, and analyzed each response. We then compared the results between both years. RESULTS: In total, 18 diabetologists and 142 non‐diabetologists responded in 2016, and 21 diabetologists and 134 non‐diabetologists responded in 2020. Many diabetologists chose biguanide as the first‐line drug for obese type 2 diabetes patients. In addition, the rate of choice of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) among physicians almost increased in 2020. Some non‐diabetologists, and even a few diabetologists, inappropriately chose SGLT2i and biguanide for patients with severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Because SGLT2i became available in 2016 and a few years have passed, both diabetologists and non‐diabetologists seemed to refrain from prescribing SGLT2i. However, with the emergence of various lines of firm evidence regarding the use of SGLT2i, physicians started to prescribe it. However, some diabetologists and non‐diabetologists chose hypoglycemic agents inadequately; therefore, there is a need for novel and precise information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-09 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9153846/ /pubmed/35044108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13750 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Uehira, Yudai
Ueno, Hiroaki
Ebihara, Emi
Uchida, Taisuke
Nabekura, Hiroki
Sakoda, Hideyuki
Yonekawa, Tadato
Yamaguchi, Hideki
Nakazato, Masamitsu
Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
title Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
title_full Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
title_fullStr Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
title_full_unstemmed Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
title_short Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
title_sort current status of diabetes treatment in miyazaki prefecture, japan: results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13750
work_keys_str_mv AT uehirayudai currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT uenohiroaki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT ebiharaemi currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT uchidataisuke currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT nabekurahiroki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT sakodahideyuki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT yonekawatadato currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT yamaguchihideki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020
AT nakazatomasamitsu currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020