Cargando…
Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The Japanese diabetes treatment guidelines do not specify the first choice of hypoglycemic agents, unlike those of Western countries. Furthermore, the current situation in diabetes treatment is that the choice of hypoglycemic agents is determined by each physician. Therefore, we a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13750 |
_version_ | 1784717921700806656 |
---|---|
author | Uehira, Yudai Ueno, Hiroaki Ebihara, Emi Uchida, Taisuke Nabekura, Hiroki Sakoda, Hideyuki Yonekawa, Tadato Yamaguchi, Hideki Nakazato, Masamitsu |
author_facet | Uehira, Yudai Ueno, Hiroaki Ebihara, Emi Uchida, Taisuke Nabekura, Hiroki Sakoda, Hideyuki Yonekawa, Tadato Yamaguchi, Hideki Nakazato, Masamitsu |
author_sort | Uehira, Yudai |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The Japanese diabetes treatment guidelines do not specify the first choice of hypoglycemic agents, unlike those of Western countries. Furthermore, the current situation in diabetes treatment is that the choice of hypoglycemic agents is determined by each physician. Therefore, we aimed to determine the current situation in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in this context. For this, we carried out a questionnaire survey among physicians twice regarding the target value of glycated hemoglobin and the choice of hypoglycemic agents in various cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered an unsigned questionnaire to physicians in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in July 2016 and March 2020. We divided responses into those of diabetologists and those of non‐diabetologists, and analyzed each response. We then compared the results between both years. RESULTS: In total, 18 diabetologists and 142 non‐diabetologists responded in 2016, and 21 diabetologists and 134 non‐diabetologists responded in 2020. Many diabetologists chose biguanide as the first‐line drug for obese type 2 diabetes patients. In addition, the rate of choice of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) among physicians almost increased in 2020. Some non‐diabetologists, and even a few diabetologists, inappropriately chose SGLT2i and biguanide for patients with severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Because SGLT2i became available in 2016 and a few years have passed, both diabetologists and non‐diabetologists seemed to refrain from prescribing SGLT2i. However, with the emergence of various lines of firm evidence regarding the use of SGLT2i, physicians started to prescribe it. However, some diabetologists and non‐diabetologists chose hypoglycemic agents inadequately; therefore, there is a need for novel and precise information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9153846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91538462022-06-05 Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 Uehira, Yudai Ueno, Hiroaki Ebihara, Emi Uchida, Taisuke Nabekura, Hiroki Sakoda, Hideyuki Yonekawa, Tadato Yamaguchi, Hideki Nakazato, Masamitsu J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The Japanese diabetes treatment guidelines do not specify the first choice of hypoglycemic agents, unlike those of Western countries. Furthermore, the current situation in diabetes treatment is that the choice of hypoglycemic agents is determined by each physician. Therefore, we aimed to determine the current situation in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in this context. For this, we carried out a questionnaire survey among physicians twice regarding the target value of glycated hemoglobin and the choice of hypoglycemic agents in various cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered an unsigned questionnaire to physicians in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in July 2016 and March 2020. We divided responses into those of diabetologists and those of non‐diabetologists, and analyzed each response. We then compared the results between both years. RESULTS: In total, 18 diabetologists and 142 non‐diabetologists responded in 2016, and 21 diabetologists and 134 non‐diabetologists responded in 2020. Many diabetologists chose biguanide as the first‐line drug for obese type 2 diabetes patients. In addition, the rate of choice of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) among physicians almost increased in 2020. Some non‐diabetologists, and even a few diabetologists, inappropriately chose SGLT2i and biguanide for patients with severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Because SGLT2i became available in 2016 and a few years have passed, both diabetologists and non‐diabetologists seemed to refrain from prescribing SGLT2i. However, with the emergence of various lines of firm evidence regarding the use of SGLT2i, physicians started to prescribe it. However, some diabetologists and non‐diabetologists chose hypoglycemic agents inadequately; therefore, there is a need for novel and precise information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-09 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9153846/ /pubmed/35044108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13750 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Uehira, Yudai Ueno, Hiroaki Ebihara, Emi Uchida, Taisuke Nabekura, Hiroki Sakoda, Hideyuki Yonekawa, Tadato Yamaguchi, Hideki Nakazato, Masamitsu Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 |
title | Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 |
title_full | Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 |
title_fullStr | Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 |
title_short | Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 |
title_sort | current status of diabetes treatment in miyazaki prefecture, japan: results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020 |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13750 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uehirayudai currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT uenohiroaki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT ebiharaemi currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT uchidataisuke currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT nabekurahiroki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT sakodahideyuki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT yonekawatadato currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT yamaguchihideki currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 AT nakazatomasamitsu currentstatusofdiabetestreatmentinmiyazakiprefecturejapanresultsofaquestionnairesurveyconductedin2016and2020 |