Cargando…

OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults

PURPOSE: To provide additional normative data for the OculoMotor Assessment Tool (OMAT) for horizontal and vertical saccades and vergence jumps and to compare the results of children to adults. METHODS: Participants with visual acuity of logMAR ≥0.0 (6/6) and Randot stereopsis of at least 250 sec of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eichler, Rachel, Mivtachi, Gila, Hershkovitz-Azoulay, Dina, Scheiman, Mitchell, Ben-Eli, Hadas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655756
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S364516
_version_ 1784717947624751104
author Eichler, Rachel
Mivtachi, Gila
Hershkovitz-Azoulay, Dina
Scheiman, Mitchell
Ben-Eli, Hadas
author_facet Eichler, Rachel
Mivtachi, Gila
Hershkovitz-Azoulay, Dina
Scheiman, Mitchell
Ben-Eli, Hadas
author_sort Eichler, Rachel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To provide additional normative data for the OculoMotor Assessment Tool (OMAT) for horizontal and vertical saccades and vergence jumps and to compare the results of children to adults. METHODS: Participants with visual acuity of logMAR ≥0.0 (6/6) and Randot stereopsis of at least 250 sec of arc without binocular disorders were recruited. Horizontal and vertical saccades, near point of convergence (NPC), accommodation and vergence jumps were evaluated using the OMAT. Means and standard deviations were reported for all parameters in children and adults. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants (ages 9–34, mean age 17.5 ± 7.2 years) participated in this study. Statistically significant differences were found for horizontal and vertical saccades with lower mean results in children, aged 9–18 (111.5 ± 20.9 and 112.5 ± 22.7, respectively) compared to adults, aged 19–34 (131.6 ± 23.9 and 126.2 ± 24.2, respectively) (P = 0.002 and 0.04, respectively). The mean of the last 30 seconds of both horizontal and vertical saccades were statistically significantly lower in the children’s group (52.5 ± 10.6 and 52.1 ± 11.3, respectively) compared to the adults (63.2 ± 10.2 and 59.3 ± 13.4, respectively) (P = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). The normative values for horizontal and vertical saccades were 119.6 ± 23.9 and 118.1 ± 24.1 saccades per minute, respectively. NPC break and recovery were 2.3 ± 2.3cm and 3.0 ± 3.3cm, respectively. The vergence jumps assessment was 79.3 ± 21.19 movements per minute. CONCLUSION: Normative values for the OMAT test were found in this study for children and adults. Assessment of endurance found children norms significantly lower for horizontal and vertical saccades compared to adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9153992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91539922022-06-01 OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults Eichler, Rachel Mivtachi, Gila Hershkovitz-Azoulay, Dina Scheiman, Mitchell Ben-Eli, Hadas Clin Optom (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: To provide additional normative data for the OculoMotor Assessment Tool (OMAT) for horizontal and vertical saccades and vergence jumps and to compare the results of children to adults. METHODS: Participants with visual acuity of logMAR ≥0.0 (6/6) and Randot stereopsis of at least 250 sec of arc without binocular disorders were recruited. Horizontal and vertical saccades, near point of convergence (NPC), accommodation and vergence jumps were evaluated using the OMAT. Means and standard deviations were reported for all parameters in children and adults. RESULTS: A total of 52 participants (ages 9–34, mean age 17.5 ± 7.2 years) participated in this study. Statistically significant differences were found for horizontal and vertical saccades with lower mean results in children, aged 9–18 (111.5 ± 20.9 and 112.5 ± 22.7, respectively) compared to adults, aged 19–34 (131.6 ± 23.9 and 126.2 ± 24.2, respectively) (P = 0.002 and 0.04, respectively). The mean of the last 30 seconds of both horizontal and vertical saccades were statistically significantly lower in the children’s group (52.5 ± 10.6 and 52.1 ± 11.3, respectively) compared to the adults (63.2 ± 10.2 and 59.3 ± 13.4, respectively) (P = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). The normative values for horizontal and vertical saccades were 119.6 ± 23.9 and 118.1 ± 24.1 saccades per minute, respectively. NPC break and recovery were 2.3 ± 2.3cm and 3.0 ± 3.3cm, respectively. The vergence jumps assessment was 79.3 ± 21.19 movements per minute. CONCLUSION: Normative values for the OMAT test were found in this study for children and adults. Assessment of endurance found children norms significantly lower for horizontal and vertical saccades compared to adults. Dove 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9153992/ /pubmed/35655756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S364516 Text en © 2022 Eichler et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Eichler, Rachel
Mivtachi, Gila
Hershkovitz-Azoulay, Dina
Scheiman, Mitchell
Ben-Eli, Hadas
OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults
title OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults
title_full OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults
title_fullStr OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults
title_full_unstemmed OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults
title_short OculoMotor Assessment Tool: Children Compared with Adults
title_sort oculomotor assessment tool: children compared with adults
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655756
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S364516
work_keys_str_mv AT eichlerrachel oculomotorassessmenttoolchildrencomparedwithadults
AT mivtachigila oculomotorassessmenttoolchildrencomparedwithadults
AT hershkovitzazoulaydina oculomotorassessmenttoolchildrencomparedwithadults
AT scheimanmitchell oculomotorassessmenttoolchildrencomparedwithadults
AT benelihadas oculomotorassessmenttoolchildrencomparedwithadults