Cargando…

Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), correcting applanation tonometer surface (CATS) and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) of Corvis ST tonometer (CVS); and to determine the effects of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ang, Robert Edward T, Bargas, Neiman Vincent R, Martinez, Gladness Henna A, Sosuan, George Michael N, Nabor-Umali, Maria Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S362344
_version_ 1784717947869069312
author Ang, Robert Edward T
Bargas, Neiman Vincent R
Martinez, Gladness Henna A
Sosuan, George Michael N
Nabor-Umali, Maria Isabel
author_facet Ang, Robert Edward T
Bargas, Neiman Vincent R
Martinez, Gladness Henna A
Sosuan, George Michael N
Nabor-Umali, Maria Isabel
author_sort Ang, Robert Edward T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), correcting applanation tonometer surface (CATS) and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) of Corvis ST tonometer (CVS); and to determine the effects of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT) and mean corneal curvature (Km) on the IOP measurements of corneal refractive patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 120 eyes of 64 patients from May 1, 2020 to June 1, 2021 who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The level of agreement between the three tonometers was evaluated, and correlation between parameters was calculated using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Mean preoperative to postoperative IOP in LASIK and PRK was 15.1 ± 3 to 11.3 ± 2.1 and 14.4 ± 2.6 to 12.1 ± 3 using GAT, 16.4 ± 2.8 to 13.1 ± 2.3 and 15.9 ± 2.6 to 13.7 ± 3 using CATS and 14.8 ± 2.4 to 12.9 ± 1.5 and 14.2 ± 2.4 to 12.6 ± 1.9 using CVS-bIOP. Preoperative IOP correlation between each tonometer pair showed that the lowest mean difference was between GAT and CVS-bIOP (0.32 in LASIK, 0.15 in PRK). Preoperative to postoperative IOP correlation of each tonometer resulted in a difference of 3.77, 2.30 in GAT; 3.32, 2.28 in CATS and 1.88, 1.62 in CVS-bIOP in the LASIK and PRK groups, respectively. Percentage change in CCT and Km was not correlated while change in MRSE had a weak relationship with percentage change in CVS-bIOP. CONCLUSION: Preoperatively, GAT and CVS-bIOP had the best agreement in IOP measurements. CATS recorded the highest IOP preoperatively and postoperatively. IOP decreased in the three tonometers after LASIK and PRK with GAT having the largest decrease. CVS-bIOP had the lowest change between preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements. Only percentage change in MRSE was correlated with percentage change in CVS-bIOP in the LASIK group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9153993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91539932022-06-01 Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy Ang, Robert Edward T Bargas, Neiman Vincent R Martinez, Gladness Henna A Sosuan, George Michael N Nabor-Umali, Maria Isabel Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), correcting applanation tonometer surface (CATS) and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) of Corvis ST tonometer (CVS); and to determine the effects of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT) and mean corneal curvature (Km) on the IOP measurements of corneal refractive patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 120 eyes of 64 patients from May 1, 2020 to June 1, 2021 who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The level of agreement between the three tonometers was evaluated, and correlation between parameters was calculated using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Mean preoperative to postoperative IOP in LASIK and PRK was 15.1 ± 3 to 11.3 ± 2.1 and 14.4 ± 2.6 to 12.1 ± 3 using GAT, 16.4 ± 2.8 to 13.1 ± 2.3 and 15.9 ± 2.6 to 13.7 ± 3 using CATS and 14.8 ± 2.4 to 12.9 ± 1.5 and 14.2 ± 2.4 to 12.6 ± 1.9 using CVS-bIOP. Preoperative IOP correlation between each tonometer pair showed that the lowest mean difference was between GAT and CVS-bIOP (0.32 in LASIK, 0.15 in PRK). Preoperative to postoperative IOP correlation of each tonometer resulted in a difference of 3.77, 2.30 in GAT; 3.32, 2.28 in CATS and 1.88, 1.62 in CVS-bIOP in the LASIK and PRK groups, respectively. Percentage change in CCT and Km was not correlated while change in MRSE had a weak relationship with percentage change in CVS-bIOP. CONCLUSION: Preoperatively, GAT and CVS-bIOP had the best agreement in IOP measurements. CATS recorded the highest IOP preoperatively and postoperatively. IOP decreased in the three tonometers after LASIK and PRK with GAT having the largest decrease. CVS-bIOP had the lowest change between preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements. Only percentage change in MRSE was correlated with percentage change in CVS-bIOP in the LASIK group. Dove 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9153993/ /pubmed/35656390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S362344 Text en © 2022 Ang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ang, Robert Edward T
Bargas, Neiman Vincent R
Martinez, Gladness Henna A
Sosuan, George Michael N
Nabor-Umali, Maria Isabel
Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy
title Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_short Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_sort comparison of three tonometers in measuring intraocular pressure in eyes that underwent myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9153993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S362344
work_keys_str_mv AT angrobertedwardt comparisonofthreetonometersinmeasuringintraocularpressureineyesthatunderwentmyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusisandphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT bargasneimanvincentr comparisonofthreetonometersinmeasuringintraocularpressureineyesthatunderwentmyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusisandphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT martinezgladnesshennaa comparisonofthreetonometersinmeasuringintraocularpressureineyesthatunderwentmyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusisandphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT sosuangeorgemichaeln comparisonofthreetonometersinmeasuringintraocularpressureineyesthatunderwentmyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusisandphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT naborumalimariaisabel comparisonofthreetonometersinmeasuringintraocularpressureineyesthatunderwentmyopiclaserinsitukeratomileusisandphotorefractivekeratectomy