Cargando…

Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus self-testing (HCVST) is an additional approach that may expand access to HCV testing. We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study to assess the usability and acceptability of HCVST among people who inject drugs (PWID), men who have sex with men (MSM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fajardo, Emmanuel, Watson, Victoria, Kumwenda, Moses, Usharidze, Dali, Gogochashvili, Sophiko, Kakhaberi, David, Giguashvili, Ana, Johnson, Cheryl C., Jamil, Muhammad S., Dacombe, Russell, Stvilia, Ketevan, Easterbrook, Philippa, Ivanova Reipold, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07484-2
_version_ 1784717954941714432
author Fajardo, Emmanuel
Watson, Victoria
Kumwenda, Moses
Usharidze, Dali
Gogochashvili, Sophiko
Kakhaberi, David
Giguashvili, Ana
Johnson, Cheryl C.
Jamil, Muhammad S.
Dacombe, Russell
Stvilia, Ketevan
Easterbrook, Philippa
Ivanova Reipold, Elena
author_facet Fajardo, Emmanuel
Watson, Victoria
Kumwenda, Moses
Usharidze, Dali
Gogochashvili, Sophiko
Kakhaberi, David
Giguashvili, Ana
Johnson, Cheryl C.
Jamil, Muhammad S.
Dacombe, Russell
Stvilia, Ketevan
Easterbrook, Philippa
Ivanova Reipold, Elena
author_sort Fajardo, Emmanuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus self-testing (HCVST) is an additional approach that may expand access to HCV testing. We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study to assess the usability and acceptability of HCVST among people who inject drugs (PWID), men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender (TG) people in Tbilisi, Georgia. METHODS: The study was conducted from December 2019 to June 2020 among PWID at one harm reduction site and among MSM/TG at one community-based organization. We used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Usability was assessed by observing errors made and difficulties faced by participants. Acceptability was assessed using an interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire. A subset of participants participated in cognitive and in-depth interviews. RESULTS: A total of 90 PWID, 84 MSM and 6 TG were observed performing HCVST. PWID were older (median age 35 vs 24) and had a lower level of education compared to MSM/TG (27% vs 59%). The proportion of participants who completed all steps successfully without assistance was 60% among PWID and 80% among MSM/TG. The most common error was in sample collection and this was observed more often among PWID than MSM/TG (21% vs 6%; p = 0.002). More PWID requested assistance during HCVST compared to MSM/TG (22% vs 8%; p = 0.011). Acceptability was high in both groups (98% vs 96%; p = 0.407). Inter-reader agreement was 97% among PWID and 99% among MSM/TG. Qualitative data from cognitive (n = 20) and in-depth interviews (n = 20) was consistent with the quantitative data confirming a high usability and acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: HCVST was highly acceptable among key populations in Georgia of relatively high educational level, and most participants performed HCVST correctly. A significant difference in usability was observed among PWID compared to MSM/TG, indicating that PWID may benefit from improved messaging and education as well as options to receive direct assistance when self-testing for HCV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07484-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9154030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91540302022-06-02 Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia Fajardo, Emmanuel Watson, Victoria Kumwenda, Moses Usharidze, Dali Gogochashvili, Sophiko Kakhaberi, David Giguashvili, Ana Johnson, Cheryl C. Jamil, Muhammad S. Dacombe, Russell Stvilia, Ketevan Easterbrook, Philippa Ivanova Reipold, Elena BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus self-testing (HCVST) is an additional approach that may expand access to HCV testing. We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study to assess the usability and acceptability of HCVST among people who inject drugs (PWID), men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender (TG) people in Tbilisi, Georgia. METHODS: The study was conducted from December 2019 to June 2020 among PWID at one harm reduction site and among MSM/TG at one community-based organization. We used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Usability was assessed by observing errors made and difficulties faced by participants. Acceptability was assessed using an interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire. A subset of participants participated in cognitive and in-depth interviews. RESULTS: A total of 90 PWID, 84 MSM and 6 TG were observed performing HCVST. PWID were older (median age 35 vs 24) and had a lower level of education compared to MSM/TG (27% vs 59%). The proportion of participants who completed all steps successfully without assistance was 60% among PWID and 80% among MSM/TG. The most common error was in sample collection and this was observed more often among PWID than MSM/TG (21% vs 6%; p = 0.002). More PWID requested assistance during HCVST compared to MSM/TG (22% vs 8%; p = 0.011). Acceptability was high in both groups (98% vs 96%; p = 0.407). Inter-reader agreement was 97% among PWID and 99% among MSM/TG. Qualitative data from cognitive (n = 20) and in-depth interviews (n = 20) was consistent with the quantitative data confirming a high usability and acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: HCVST was highly acceptable among key populations in Georgia of relatively high educational level, and most participants performed HCVST correctly. A significant difference in usability was observed among PWID compared to MSM/TG, indicating that PWID may benefit from improved messaging and education as well as options to receive direct assistance when self-testing for HCV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07484-2. BioMed Central 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9154030/ /pubmed/35641908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07484-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fajardo, Emmanuel
Watson, Victoria
Kumwenda, Moses
Usharidze, Dali
Gogochashvili, Sophiko
Kakhaberi, David
Giguashvili, Ana
Johnson, Cheryl C.
Jamil, Muhammad S.
Dacombe, Russell
Stvilia, Ketevan
Easterbrook, Philippa
Ivanova Reipold, Elena
Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
title Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
title_full Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
title_fullStr Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
title_short Usability and acceptability of oral-based HCV self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in Tbilisi, Georgia
title_sort usability and acceptability of oral-based hcv self-testing among key populations: a mixed-methods evaluation in tbilisi, georgia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07484-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fajardoemmanuel usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT watsonvictoria usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT kumwendamoses usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT usharidzedali usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT gogochashvilisophiko usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT kakhaberidavid usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT giguashviliana usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT johnsoncherylc usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT jamilmuhammads usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT dacomberussell usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT stviliaketevan usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT easterbrookphilippa usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia
AT ivanovareipoldelena usabilityandacceptabilityoforalbasedhcvselftestingamongkeypopulationsamixedmethodsevaluationintbilisigeorgia