Cargando…
Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the omission of tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy reduces postoperative pain without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. METHOD: This was an open-label, randomized clin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac070 |
_version_ | 1784718011841642496 |
---|---|
author | Langenbach, Mike Ralf Florescu, Razvan-Valentin Köhler, Andreas Barkus, Jörg Ritz, Jörg-Peter Quemalli, Eduart Siegel, Robert Zirngibl, Hubert Lefering, Rolf Bönicke, Lars |
author_facet | Langenbach, Mike Ralf Florescu, Razvan-Valentin Köhler, Andreas Barkus, Jörg Ritz, Jörg-Peter Quemalli, Eduart Siegel, Robert Zirngibl, Hubert Lefering, Rolf Bönicke, Lars |
author_sort | Langenbach, Mike Ralf |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Symptomatic haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the omission of tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy reduces postoperative pain without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. METHOD: This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 German hospitals. All patients with third- or fourth-degree haemorrhoids undergoing haemorrhoidectomy were considered eligible for selection in the intervention (no dressing) or control group (tamponade applied). Two co-primary outcomes were analysed by testing hierarchically ordered hypotheses. First, maximum pain intensity within 48 h after surgery was compared between the groups (superiority). This was followed by an analysis of severe bleeding complications, defined as any bleeding requiring surgical re-intervention within 7 days (non-inferiority). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, haemoglobin levels, and adverse events. RESULTS: Out of 950 patients screened, 754 were randomized and 725 received intervention (366 patients in the intervention and 359 patients in the control group). In the group with tamponade dressings, median pain intensity on the 0 to 10 scale was 6 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 4–7). Patients without tamponade dressings reported significantly less pain (median 5 (i.q.r. 3–7), P < 0.001). In each group, five patients (1.4 per cent) experienced severe bleeding. The absolute difference for the severe bleeding rate was −0.03 per cent with the 90 per cent confidence interval ranging from −1.47 per cent to +1.41 per cent, in line with the non-inferiority aim. No significant between-group difference was found for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of inserting tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy correlates with increased postoperative pain and does not provide benefits in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011590 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9154318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91543182022-06-04 Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial Langenbach, Mike Ralf Florescu, Razvan-Valentin Köhler, Andreas Barkus, Jörg Ritz, Jörg-Peter Quemalli, Eduart Siegel, Robert Zirngibl, Hubert Lefering, Rolf Bönicke, Lars BJS Open Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Symptomatic haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the omission of tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy reduces postoperative pain without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. METHOD: This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 German hospitals. All patients with third- or fourth-degree haemorrhoids undergoing haemorrhoidectomy were considered eligible for selection in the intervention (no dressing) or control group (tamponade applied). Two co-primary outcomes were analysed by testing hierarchically ordered hypotheses. First, maximum pain intensity within 48 h after surgery was compared between the groups (superiority). This was followed by an analysis of severe bleeding complications, defined as any bleeding requiring surgical re-intervention within 7 days (non-inferiority). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, haemoglobin levels, and adverse events. RESULTS: Out of 950 patients screened, 754 were randomized and 725 received intervention (366 patients in the intervention and 359 patients in the control group). In the group with tamponade dressings, median pain intensity on the 0 to 10 scale was 6 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 4–7). Patients without tamponade dressings reported significantly less pain (median 5 (i.q.r. 3–7), P < 0.001). In each group, five patients (1.4 per cent) experienced severe bleeding. The absolute difference for the severe bleeding rate was −0.03 per cent with the 90 per cent confidence interval ranging from −1.47 per cent to +1.41 per cent, in line with the non-inferiority aim. No significant between-group difference was found for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of inserting tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy correlates with increased postoperative pain and does not provide benefits in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011590 Oxford University Press 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9154318/ /pubmed/35639947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac070 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Randomized Clinical Trial Langenbach, Mike Ralf Florescu, Razvan-Valentin Köhler, Andreas Barkus, Jörg Ritz, Jörg-Peter Quemalli, Eduart Siegel, Robert Zirngibl, Hubert Lefering, Rolf Bönicke, Lars Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial |
title | Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial |
topic | Randomized Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langenbachmikeralf tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT florescurazvanvalentin tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT kohlerandreas tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT barkusjorg tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT ritzjorgpeter tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT quemallieduart tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT siegelrobert tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT zirngiblhubert tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT leferingrolf tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial AT bonickelars tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial |