Cargando…

Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the omission of tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy reduces postoperative pain without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. METHOD: This was an open-label, randomized clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langenbach, Mike Ralf, Florescu, Razvan-Valentin, Köhler, Andreas, Barkus, Jörg, Ritz, Jörg-Peter, Quemalli, Eduart, Siegel, Robert, Zirngibl, Hubert, Lefering, Rolf, Bönicke, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac070
_version_ 1784718011841642496
author Langenbach, Mike Ralf
Florescu, Razvan-Valentin
Köhler, Andreas
Barkus, Jörg
Ritz, Jörg-Peter
Quemalli, Eduart
Siegel, Robert
Zirngibl, Hubert
Lefering, Rolf
Bönicke, Lars
author_facet Langenbach, Mike Ralf
Florescu, Razvan-Valentin
Köhler, Andreas
Barkus, Jörg
Ritz, Jörg-Peter
Quemalli, Eduart
Siegel, Robert
Zirngibl, Hubert
Lefering, Rolf
Bönicke, Lars
author_sort Langenbach, Mike Ralf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Symptomatic haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the omission of tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy reduces postoperative pain without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. METHOD: This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 German hospitals. All patients with third- or fourth-degree haemorrhoids undergoing haemorrhoidectomy were considered eligible for selection in the intervention (no dressing) or control group (tamponade applied). Two co-primary outcomes were analysed by testing hierarchically ordered hypotheses. First, maximum pain intensity within 48 h after surgery was compared between the groups (superiority). This was followed by an analysis of severe bleeding complications, defined as any bleeding requiring surgical re-intervention within 7 days (non-inferiority). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, haemoglobin levels, and adverse events. RESULTS: Out of 950 patients screened, 754 were randomized and 725 received intervention (366 patients in the intervention and 359 patients in the control group). In the group with tamponade dressings, median pain intensity on the 0 to 10 scale was 6 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 4–7). Patients without tamponade dressings reported significantly less pain (median 5 (i.q.r. 3–7), P < 0.001). In each group, five patients (1.4 per cent) experienced severe bleeding. The absolute difference for the severe bleeding rate was −0.03 per cent with the 90 per cent confidence interval ranging from −1.47 per cent to +1.41 per cent, in line with the non-inferiority aim. No significant between-group difference was found for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of inserting tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy correlates with increased postoperative pain and does not provide benefits in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011590
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9154318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91543182022-06-04 Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial Langenbach, Mike Ralf Florescu, Razvan-Valentin Köhler, Andreas Barkus, Jörg Ritz, Jörg-Peter Quemalli, Eduart Siegel, Robert Zirngibl, Hubert Lefering, Rolf Bönicke, Lars BJS Open Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Symptomatic haemorrhoids are a common anorectal disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the omission of tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy reduces postoperative pain without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. METHOD: This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 German hospitals. All patients with third- or fourth-degree haemorrhoids undergoing haemorrhoidectomy were considered eligible for selection in the intervention (no dressing) or control group (tamponade applied). Two co-primary outcomes were analysed by testing hierarchically ordered hypotheses. First, maximum pain intensity within 48 h after surgery was compared between the groups (superiority). This was followed by an analysis of severe bleeding complications, defined as any bleeding requiring surgical re-intervention within 7 days (non-inferiority). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, haemoglobin levels, and adverse events. RESULTS: Out of 950 patients screened, 754 were randomized and 725 received intervention (366 patients in the intervention and 359 patients in the control group). In the group with tamponade dressings, median pain intensity on the 0 to 10 scale was 6 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 4–7). Patients without tamponade dressings reported significantly less pain (median 5 (i.q.r. 3–7), P < 0.001). In each group, five patients (1.4 per cent) experienced severe bleeding. The absolute difference for the severe bleeding rate was −0.03 per cent with the 90 per cent confidence interval ranging from −1.47 per cent to +1.41 per cent, in line with the non-inferiority aim. No significant between-group difference was found for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of inserting tamponade dressings after haemorrhoidectomy correlates with increased postoperative pain and does not provide benefits in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011590 Oxford University Press 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9154318/ /pubmed/35639947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac070 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Randomized Clinical Trial
Langenbach, Mike Ralf
Florescu, Razvan-Valentin
Köhler, Andreas
Barkus, Jörg
Ritz, Jörg-Peter
Quemalli, Eduart
Siegel, Robert
Zirngibl, Hubert
Lefering, Rolf
Bönicke, Lars
Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
title Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
title_full Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
title_short Tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
title_sort tamponade dressing versus no dressing after haemorrhoidectomy: multicentre, randomized clinical trial
topic Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac070
work_keys_str_mv AT langenbachmikeralf tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT florescurazvanvalentin tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kohlerandreas tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT barkusjorg tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ritzjorgpeter tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT quemallieduart tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT siegelrobert tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zirngiblhubert tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT leferingrolf tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bonickelars tamponadedressingversusnodressingafterhaemorrhoidectomymulticentrerandomizedclinicaltrial